Effect sizes, statistical power and sample sizes in "The Japanese Journal of Psychology"

Yumi Suzukawa, Hideki Toyoda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study analyzed the statistical power of research studies published in the "Japanese Journal of Psychology" in 2008 and 2009. Sample effect sizes and sample statistical powers were calculated for each statistical test and analyzed with respect to the analytical methods and the fields of the studies. The results show that in the fields like perception, cognition or learning, the effect sizes were relatively large, although the sample sizes were small. At the same time, because of the small sample sizes, some meaningful effects could not be detected. In the other fields, because of the large sample sizes, meaningless effects could be detected. This implies that researchers who could not get large enough effect sizes would use larger samples to obtain significant results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-63
Number of pages13
JournalShinrigaku Kenkyu
Volume83
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Apr

Fingerprint

Sample Size
Psychology
Cognition
Research Personnel
Learning
Research

Keywords

  • Effect size
  • Power analysis
  • Sample size

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Effect sizes, statistical power and sample sizes in "The Japanese Journal of Psychology". / Suzukawa, Yumi; Toyoda, Hideki.

In: Shinrigaku Kenkyu, Vol. 83, No. 1, 04.2012, p. 51-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{955c23a5de5247a29dfba9f626c58bcd,
title = "Effect sizes, statistical power and sample sizes in {"}The Japanese Journal of Psychology{"}",
abstract = "This study analyzed the statistical power of research studies published in the {"}Japanese Journal of Psychology{"} in 2008 and 2009. Sample effect sizes and sample statistical powers were calculated for each statistical test and analyzed with respect to the analytical methods and the fields of the studies. The results show that in the fields like perception, cognition or learning, the effect sizes were relatively large, although the sample sizes were small. At the same time, because of the small sample sizes, some meaningful effects could not be detected. In the other fields, because of the large sample sizes, meaningless effects could be detected. This implies that researchers who could not get large enough effect sizes would use larger samples to obtain significant results.",
keywords = "Effect size, Power analysis, Sample size",
author = "Yumi Suzukawa and Hideki Toyoda",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "51--63",
journal = "Shinrigaku Kenkyu",
issn = "0021-5236",
publisher = "Japanese Psychological Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect sizes, statistical power and sample sizes in "The Japanese Journal of Psychology"

AU - Suzukawa, Yumi

AU - Toyoda, Hideki

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - This study analyzed the statistical power of research studies published in the "Japanese Journal of Psychology" in 2008 and 2009. Sample effect sizes and sample statistical powers were calculated for each statistical test and analyzed with respect to the analytical methods and the fields of the studies. The results show that in the fields like perception, cognition or learning, the effect sizes were relatively large, although the sample sizes were small. At the same time, because of the small sample sizes, some meaningful effects could not be detected. In the other fields, because of the large sample sizes, meaningless effects could be detected. This implies that researchers who could not get large enough effect sizes would use larger samples to obtain significant results.

AB - This study analyzed the statistical power of research studies published in the "Japanese Journal of Psychology" in 2008 and 2009. Sample effect sizes and sample statistical powers were calculated for each statistical test and analyzed with respect to the analytical methods and the fields of the studies. The results show that in the fields like perception, cognition or learning, the effect sizes were relatively large, although the sample sizes were small. At the same time, because of the small sample sizes, some meaningful effects could not be detected. In the other fields, because of the large sample sizes, meaningless effects could be detected. This implies that researchers who could not get large enough effect sizes would use larger samples to obtain significant results.

KW - Effect size

KW - Power analysis

KW - Sample size

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863693133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863693133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 22715539

AN - SCOPUS:84863693133

VL - 83

SP - 51

EP - 63

JO - Shinrigaku Kenkyu

JF - Shinrigaku Kenkyu

SN - 0021-5236

IS - 1

ER -