Effects of management treatments on the carbon cycle of a cool-temperate broad-leaved deciduous forest and its potential as a bioenergy source

Kayo Matsushita, Mitsutoshi Tomotsune, Yoshiaki Sakamaki, Hiroshi Koizumi

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The ecological effects of management treatments on the carbon cycles of secondary forests remain poorly understood. Here, we compared carbon cycles at three sites, a managed understory harvesting site (UH), a managed understory harvesting and litter raking site (LR), and an unmanaged site that served as a control (Um). We considered the harvests of understory and litter biomass as bioenergy sources, and made compartment models for the carbon cycle in units of carbon. Management increased the net primary production from 6.7 tC ha−1 year−1 for the Um site to 7.2 tC ha−1 year−1 for the UH site and 7.8 tC ha−1 year−1 for the LR site. Concurrently, management reduced the decomposition rate from 5.1 tC ha−1 year−1 for the Um site to 3.7 tC ha−1 year−1 for the UH site and 3.8 tC ha−1 year−1 for the LR site. Management also reduced fossil fuel use by 0.7 tC ha−1 year−1 for the UH site and 3.5 tC ha−1 year−1 for the LR site. These values suggest that harvesting had positive effects on net ecosystem production (NEP). In contrast, bioenergy use released 1.3 tC ha−1 year−1 into the atmosphere (in the form of carbon dioxide) for the UH site and 6.9 tC ha−1 year−1 for the LR site. These values suggest that harvesting had negative effects on NEP. We conclude that understory harvesting without litter raking (UH) maximized NEP at 2.9 tC ha−1 year−1. Our findings underscore the importance of a balanced ecological approach to forest management.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)293-302
    Number of pages10
    JournalEcological Research
    Volume30
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    broad-leaved forest
    bioenergy
    deciduous forests
    deciduous forest
    carbon cycle
    understory
    litter
    net ecosystem production
    effect
    ecological approach
    net primary production
    fossil fuels
    secondary forest
    secondary forests
    fossil fuel
    forest management
    primary productivity
    carbon dioxide
    decomposition

    Keywords

    • Bioenergy
    • Compartment model
    • Net ecosystem production
    • SATOYAMA
    • Soil respiration

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

    Cite this

    Effects of management treatments on the carbon cycle of a cool-temperate broad-leaved deciduous forest and its potential as a bioenergy source. / Matsushita, Kayo; Tomotsune, Mitsutoshi; Sakamaki, Yoshiaki; Koizumi, Hiroshi.

    In: Ecological Research, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2015, p. 293-302.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{f31b07bb92bd4125b865883bf7d39666,
    title = "Effects of management treatments on the carbon cycle of a cool-temperate broad-leaved deciduous forest and its potential as a bioenergy source",
    abstract = "The ecological effects of management treatments on the carbon cycles of secondary forests remain poorly understood. Here, we compared carbon cycles at three sites, a managed understory harvesting site (UH), a managed understory harvesting and litter raking site (LR), and an unmanaged site that served as a control (Um). We considered the harvests of understory and litter biomass as bioenergy sources, and made compartment models for the carbon cycle in units of carbon. Management increased the net primary production from 6.7 tC ha−1 year−1 for the Um site to 7.2 tC ha−1 year−1 for the UH site and 7.8 tC ha−1 year−1 for the LR site. Concurrently, management reduced the decomposition rate from 5.1 tC ha−1 year−1 for the Um site to 3.7 tC ha−1 year−1 for the UH site and 3.8 tC ha−1 year−1 for the LR site. Management also reduced fossil fuel use by 0.7 tC ha−1 year−1 for the UH site and 3.5 tC ha−1 year−1 for the LR site. These values suggest that harvesting had positive effects on net ecosystem production (NEP). In contrast, bioenergy use released 1.3 tC ha−1 year−1 into the atmosphere (in the form of carbon dioxide) for the UH site and 6.9 tC ha−1 year−1 for the LR site. These values suggest that harvesting had negative effects on NEP. We conclude that understory harvesting without litter raking (UH) maximized NEP at 2.9 tC ha−1 year−1. Our findings underscore the importance of a balanced ecological approach to forest management.",
    keywords = "Bioenergy, Compartment model, Net ecosystem production, SATOYAMA, Soil respiration",
    author = "Kayo Matsushita and Mitsutoshi Tomotsune and Yoshiaki Sakamaki and Hiroshi Koizumi",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1007/s11284-014-1234-2",
    language = "English",
    volume = "30",
    pages = "293--302",
    journal = "Ecological Research",
    issn = "0912-3814",
    publisher = "Springer Japan",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Effects of management treatments on the carbon cycle of a cool-temperate broad-leaved deciduous forest and its potential as a bioenergy source

    AU - Matsushita, Kayo

    AU - Tomotsune, Mitsutoshi

    AU - Sakamaki, Yoshiaki

    AU - Koizumi, Hiroshi

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - The ecological effects of management treatments on the carbon cycles of secondary forests remain poorly understood. Here, we compared carbon cycles at three sites, a managed understory harvesting site (UH), a managed understory harvesting and litter raking site (LR), and an unmanaged site that served as a control (Um). We considered the harvests of understory and litter biomass as bioenergy sources, and made compartment models for the carbon cycle in units of carbon. Management increased the net primary production from 6.7 tC ha−1 year−1 for the Um site to 7.2 tC ha−1 year−1 for the UH site and 7.8 tC ha−1 year−1 for the LR site. Concurrently, management reduced the decomposition rate from 5.1 tC ha−1 year−1 for the Um site to 3.7 tC ha−1 year−1 for the UH site and 3.8 tC ha−1 year−1 for the LR site. Management also reduced fossil fuel use by 0.7 tC ha−1 year−1 for the UH site and 3.5 tC ha−1 year−1 for the LR site. These values suggest that harvesting had positive effects on net ecosystem production (NEP). In contrast, bioenergy use released 1.3 tC ha−1 year−1 into the atmosphere (in the form of carbon dioxide) for the UH site and 6.9 tC ha−1 year−1 for the LR site. These values suggest that harvesting had negative effects on NEP. We conclude that understory harvesting without litter raking (UH) maximized NEP at 2.9 tC ha−1 year−1. Our findings underscore the importance of a balanced ecological approach to forest management.

    AB - The ecological effects of management treatments on the carbon cycles of secondary forests remain poorly understood. Here, we compared carbon cycles at three sites, a managed understory harvesting site (UH), a managed understory harvesting and litter raking site (LR), and an unmanaged site that served as a control (Um). We considered the harvests of understory and litter biomass as bioenergy sources, and made compartment models for the carbon cycle in units of carbon. Management increased the net primary production from 6.7 tC ha−1 year−1 for the Um site to 7.2 tC ha−1 year−1 for the UH site and 7.8 tC ha−1 year−1 for the LR site. Concurrently, management reduced the decomposition rate from 5.1 tC ha−1 year−1 for the Um site to 3.7 tC ha−1 year−1 for the UH site and 3.8 tC ha−1 year−1 for the LR site. Management also reduced fossil fuel use by 0.7 tC ha−1 year−1 for the UH site and 3.5 tC ha−1 year−1 for the LR site. These values suggest that harvesting had positive effects on net ecosystem production (NEP). In contrast, bioenergy use released 1.3 tC ha−1 year−1 into the atmosphere (in the form of carbon dioxide) for the UH site and 6.9 tC ha−1 year−1 for the LR site. These values suggest that harvesting had negative effects on NEP. We conclude that understory harvesting without litter raking (UH) maximized NEP at 2.9 tC ha−1 year−1. Our findings underscore the importance of a balanced ecological approach to forest management.

    KW - Bioenergy

    KW - Compartment model

    KW - Net ecosystem production

    KW - SATOYAMA

    KW - Soil respiration

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925535630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925535630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s11284-014-1234-2

    DO - 10.1007/s11284-014-1234-2

    M3 - Article

    VL - 30

    SP - 293

    EP - 302

    JO - Ecological Research

    JF - Ecological Research

    SN - 0912-3814

    IS - 2

    ER -