Effects of substantiation of the results of mental operations on understanding the ratio of the areas of two similar figures

Toshihiko Shindo, Keiichi Magara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior research demonstrated that students, even at the university undergraduate level, thought that when the length of the sides of a rectangle was enlarged k times, the rectangle's area was also enlarged k times. It was hypothesized that this "illusion of linearity" was the result of inappropriate mental operation of the formula for the area of a rectangle. The aim of Experiment 1 was to increase learners' understanding of the following rule: "If length×k, then area × k 2". Participants (159 undergraduates) were divided into 3 groups. As a demonstration of incorrect linearity, materials were prepared to substantiate the participants' incorrect mental operation. Group A was presented with 2 rectangular photos of a face, one of which was the original photograph, the other, the same photograph enlarged 3 times by enlarging only the width of the original, so that the enlarged version was an oblong version of the original. Group B was presented with 2 rectangles that were the same shape as the photographs used in Group A. Group C was presented no such materials. The performance of the students in Group A was best on the post-test. Experiments 2 (233 undergraduates) and 3 (109 undergraduates) demonstrated that the oblong was effective in changing the students' understanding only when it gave them a sense of incongruity in contrast to actual objects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)320-329
Number of pages10
JournalJapanese Journal of Educational Psychology
Volume59
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Students
Group
student
experiment
Research
university
performance
time

Keywords

  • Illusion of linearity
  • Substantiating the results of mental operations
  • Undergraduates

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

Effects of substantiation of the results of mental operations on understanding the ratio of the areas of two similar figures. / Shindo, Toshihiko; Magara, Keiichi.

In: Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 59, No. 3, 2011, p. 320-329.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{df037320f48a4c7cb3b63d7b5316610c,
title = "Effects of substantiation of the results of mental operations on understanding the ratio of the areas of two similar figures",
abstract = "Prior research demonstrated that students, even at the university undergraduate level, thought that when the length of the sides of a rectangle was enlarged k times, the rectangle's area was also enlarged k times. It was hypothesized that this {"}illusion of linearity{"} was the result of inappropriate mental operation of the formula for the area of a rectangle. The aim of Experiment 1 was to increase learners' understanding of the following rule: {"}If length×k, then area × k 2{"}. Participants (159 undergraduates) were divided into 3 groups. As a demonstration of incorrect linearity, materials were prepared to substantiate the participants' incorrect mental operation. Group A was presented with 2 rectangular photos of a face, one of which was the original photograph, the other, the same photograph enlarged 3 times by enlarging only the width of the original, so that the enlarged version was an oblong version of the original. Group B was presented with 2 rectangles that were the same shape as the photographs used in Group A. Group C was presented no such materials. The performance of the students in Group A was best on the post-test. Experiments 2 (233 undergraduates) and 3 (109 undergraduates) demonstrated that the oblong was effective in changing the students' understanding only when it gave them a sense of incongruity in contrast to actual objects.",
keywords = "Illusion of linearity, Substantiating the results of mental operations, Undergraduates",
author = "Toshihiko Shindo and Keiichi Magara",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.5926/jjep.59.320",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "320--329",
journal = "Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology",
issn = "0021-5015",
publisher = "Japanese Association of Educational Psychology",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of substantiation of the results of mental operations on understanding the ratio of the areas of two similar figures

AU - Shindo, Toshihiko

AU - Magara, Keiichi

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Prior research demonstrated that students, even at the university undergraduate level, thought that when the length of the sides of a rectangle was enlarged k times, the rectangle's area was also enlarged k times. It was hypothesized that this "illusion of linearity" was the result of inappropriate mental operation of the formula for the area of a rectangle. The aim of Experiment 1 was to increase learners' understanding of the following rule: "If length×k, then area × k 2". Participants (159 undergraduates) were divided into 3 groups. As a demonstration of incorrect linearity, materials were prepared to substantiate the participants' incorrect mental operation. Group A was presented with 2 rectangular photos of a face, one of which was the original photograph, the other, the same photograph enlarged 3 times by enlarging only the width of the original, so that the enlarged version was an oblong version of the original. Group B was presented with 2 rectangles that were the same shape as the photographs used in Group A. Group C was presented no such materials. The performance of the students in Group A was best on the post-test. Experiments 2 (233 undergraduates) and 3 (109 undergraduates) demonstrated that the oblong was effective in changing the students' understanding only when it gave them a sense of incongruity in contrast to actual objects.

AB - Prior research demonstrated that students, even at the university undergraduate level, thought that when the length of the sides of a rectangle was enlarged k times, the rectangle's area was also enlarged k times. It was hypothesized that this "illusion of linearity" was the result of inappropriate mental operation of the formula for the area of a rectangle. The aim of Experiment 1 was to increase learners' understanding of the following rule: "If length×k, then area × k 2". Participants (159 undergraduates) were divided into 3 groups. As a demonstration of incorrect linearity, materials were prepared to substantiate the participants' incorrect mental operation. Group A was presented with 2 rectangular photos of a face, one of which was the original photograph, the other, the same photograph enlarged 3 times by enlarging only the width of the original, so that the enlarged version was an oblong version of the original. Group B was presented with 2 rectangles that were the same shape as the photographs used in Group A. Group C was presented no such materials. The performance of the students in Group A was best on the post-test. Experiments 2 (233 undergraduates) and 3 (109 undergraduates) demonstrated that the oblong was effective in changing the students' understanding only when it gave them a sense of incongruity in contrast to actual objects.

KW - Illusion of linearity

KW - Substantiating the results of mental operations

KW - Undergraduates

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860426411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860426411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5926/jjep.59.320

DO - 10.5926/jjep.59.320

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84860426411

VL - 59

SP - 320

EP - 329

JO - Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology

JF - Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology

SN - 0021-5015

IS - 3

ER -