Effort, success, and nonuse determine arm choice

Nicolas Schweighofer, Yupeng Xiao, Sujin Kim, Toshinori Yoshioka, James Gordon, Rieko Osu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How do humans choose one arm or the other to reach single targets in front of the body? Current theories of reward-driven decisionmaking predict that choice results from a comparison of “action values,” which are the expected rewards for possible actions in a given state. In addition, current theories of motor control predict that in planning arm movements, humans minimize an expected motor cost that balances motor effort and endpoint accuracy. Here, we test the hypotheses that arm choice is determined by comparison of action values comprising expected effort and expected task success for each arm, as well as a handedness bias. Right-handed subjects, in either a large or small target condition, were first instructed to use each hand in turn to shoot through an array of targets and then to choose either hand to shoot through the same targets. Effort was estimated via inverse kinematics and dynamics. A mixed-effects logistic-regression analysis showed that, as predicted, both expected effort and expected success predicted choice, as did arm use in the preceding trial. Finally, individual parameter estimation showed that the handedness bias correlated with mean difference between right-and left-arm success, leading to overall lower use of the left arm. We discuss our results in light of arm nonuse in individuals’ poststroke.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberA36
Pages (from-to)551-559
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Neurophysiology
Volume114
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jul 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Arm
Functional Laterality
Reward
Hand
Biomechanical Phenomena
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Decisionmaking
  • Motor control
  • Motor cost
  • Motor effort
  • Reaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Physiology

Cite this

Schweighofer, N., Xiao, Y., Kim, S., Yoshioka, T., Gordon, J., & Osu, R. (2015). Effort, success, and nonuse determine arm choice. Journal of Neurophysiology, 114(1), 551-559. [A36]. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00593.2014

Effort, success, and nonuse determine arm choice. / Schweighofer, Nicolas; Xiao, Yupeng; Kim, Sujin; Yoshioka, Toshinori; Gordon, James; Osu, Rieko.

In: Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 114, No. 1, A36, 01.07.2015, p. 551-559.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schweighofer, N, Xiao, Y, Kim, S, Yoshioka, T, Gordon, J & Osu, R 2015, 'Effort, success, and nonuse determine arm choice', Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 114, no. 1, A36, pp. 551-559. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00593.2014
Schweighofer N, Xiao Y, Kim S, Yoshioka T, Gordon J, Osu R. Effort, success, and nonuse determine arm choice. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2015 Jul 1;114(1):551-559. A36. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00593.2014
Schweighofer, Nicolas ; Xiao, Yupeng ; Kim, Sujin ; Yoshioka, Toshinori ; Gordon, James ; Osu, Rieko. / Effort, success, and nonuse determine arm choice. In: Journal of Neurophysiology. 2015 ; Vol. 114, No. 1. pp. 551-559.
@article{792bfa28321a4132850d85fd8bb6784d,
title = "Effort, success, and nonuse determine arm choice",
abstract = "How do humans choose one arm or the other to reach single targets in front of the body? Current theories of reward-driven decisionmaking predict that choice results from a comparison of “action values,” which are the expected rewards for possible actions in a given state. In addition, current theories of motor control predict that in planning arm movements, humans minimize an expected motor cost that balances motor effort and endpoint accuracy. Here, we test the hypotheses that arm choice is determined by comparison of action values comprising expected effort and expected task success for each arm, as well as a handedness bias. Right-handed subjects, in either a large or small target condition, were first instructed to use each hand in turn to shoot through an array of targets and then to choose either hand to shoot through the same targets. Effort was estimated via inverse kinematics and dynamics. A mixed-effects logistic-regression analysis showed that, as predicted, both expected effort and expected success predicted choice, as did arm use in the preceding trial. Finally, individual parameter estimation showed that the handedness bias correlated with mean difference between right-and left-arm success, leading to overall lower use of the left arm. We discuss our results in light of arm nonuse in individuals’ poststroke.",
keywords = "Decisionmaking, Motor control, Motor cost, Motor effort, Reaching",
author = "Nicolas Schweighofer and Yupeng Xiao and Sujin Kim and Toshinori Yoshioka and James Gordon and Rieko Osu",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1152/jn.00593.2014",
language = "English",
volume = "114",
pages = "551--559",
journal = "Journal of Neurophysiology",
issn = "0022-3077",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effort, success, and nonuse determine arm choice

AU - Schweighofer, Nicolas

AU - Xiao, Yupeng

AU - Kim, Sujin

AU - Yoshioka, Toshinori

AU - Gordon, James

AU - Osu, Rieko

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - How do humans choose one arm or the other to reach single targets in front of the body? Current theories of reward-driven decisionmaking predict that choice results from a comparison of “action values,” which are the expected rewards for possible actions in a given state. In addition, current theories of motor control predict that in planning arm movements, humans minimize an expected motor cost that balances motor effort and endpoint accuracy. Here, we test the hypotheses that arm choice is determined by comparison of action values comprising expected effort and expected task success for each arm, as well as a handedness bias. Right-handed subjects, in either a large or small target condition, were first instructed to use each hand in turn to shoot through an array of targets and then to choose either hand to shoot through the same targets. Effort was estimated via inverse kinematics and dynamics. A mixed-effects logistic-regression analysis showed that, as predicted, both expected effort and expected success predicted choice, as did arm use in the preceding trial. Finally, individual parameter estimation showed that the handedness bias correlated with mean difference between right-and left-arm success, leading to overall lower use of the left arm. We discuss our results in light of arm nonuse in individuals’ poststroke.

AB - How do humans choose one arm or the other to reach single targets in front of the body? Current theories of reward-driven decisionmaking predict that choice results from a comparison of “action values,” which are the expected rewards for possible actions in a given state. In addition, current theories of motor control predict that in planning arm movements, humans minimize an expected motor cost that balances motor effort and endpoint accuracy. Here, we test the hypotheses that arm choice is determined by comparison of action values comprising expected effort and expected task success for each arm, as well as a handedness bias. Right-handed subjects, in either a large or small target condition, were first instructed to use each hand in turn to shoot through an array of targets and then to choose either hand to shoot through the same targets. Effort was estimated via inverse kinematics and dynamics. A mixed-effects logistic-regression analysis showed that, as predicted, both expected effort and expected success predicted choice, as did arm use in the preceding trial. Finally, individual parameter estimation showed that the handedness bias correlated with mean difference between right-and left-arm success, leading to overall lower use of the left arm. We discuss our results in light of arm nonuse in individuals’ poststroke.

KW - Decisionmaking

KW - Motor control

KW - Motor cost

KW - Motor effort

KW - Reaching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937437180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937437180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/jn.00593.2014

DO - 10.1152/jn.00593.2014

M3 - Article

C2 - 25948869

AN - SCOPUS:84937437180

VL - 114

SP - 551

EP - 559

JO - Journal of Neurophysiology

JF - Journal of Neurophysiology

SN - 0022-3077

IS - 1

M1 - A36

ER -