Empirical verification of Meaning-Game-based generalization of centering theory with large Japanese corpus

Shun Shiramatsu, Kazunori Komatani, Takashi Miyata, Kôiti Hasida, Hiroshi G. Okuno

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Centering theory (Grosz et al., 1995) tries to explain relations among attention, anaphora, and cohesion. It has two theoretical limitations. The first is the lack of a principle behind these discourse phenomena. The second is that the salience of discourse entities has not been quantitatively defined, although it plays a critical role in this theory. Hasida et al. (1995, 1996) propose the meaning game as a more principled model of intentional communication based on game theory, and claim that it can derive centering theory. This claim, however, has not yet been verified on the basis of substantial linguistic data. In this paper, we formulate salience as a measurable quantity in terms of a reference probability. We also formulate preferences subsuming centering theory under this quantitative formulation of salience. The preferences are derived from the meaning game and entail more general predictions than those of conventional centering theory. These formulations overcome the above limitations of centering theory. By following them, we empirically verify our generalization with a large Japanese corpus. The experimental results show that there is positive correlation between the salience (reference probability) of an entity and the simplicity (utility) of a noun phrase which refers to the entity. They also indicate correspondence between the values of expected utility and the ranking of the transition states. These results indicate that our generalization is appropriate.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPACLIC 19 - Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes
Event19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, PACLIC 19 - Taipei
Duration: 2005 Dec 12005 Dec 3

Other

Other19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, PACLIC 19
CityTaipei
Period05/12/105/12/3

Fingerprint

Game theory
Linguistics
Communication
Centering Theory
Entity
Discourse
Game Theory
Ranking
Anaphora
Intentional Communication
Expected Utility
Conventional
Noun Phrase
Cohesion
Prediction
Simplicity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Computer Science (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Shiramatsu, S., Komatani, K., Miyata, T., Hasida, K., & Okuno, H. G. (2005). Empirical verification of Meaning-Game-based generalization of centering theory with large Japanese corpus. In PACLIC 19 - Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation

Empirical verification of Meaning-Game-based generalization of centering theory with large Japanese corpus. / Shiramatsu, Shun; Komatani, Kazunori; Miyata, Takashi; Hasida, Kôiti; Okuno, Hiroshi G.

PACLIC 19 - Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation. 2005.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Shiramatsu, S, Komatani, K, Miyata, T, Hasida, K & Okuno, HG 2005, Empirical verification of Meaning-Game-based generalization of centering theory with large Japanese corpus. in PACLIC 19 - Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation. 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, PACLIC 19, Taipei, 05/12/1.
Shiramatsu S, Komatani K, Miyata T, Hasida K, Okuno HG. Empirical verification of Meaning-Game-based generalization of centering theory with large Japanese corpus. In PACLIC 19 - Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation. 2005
Shiramatsu, Shun ; Komatani, Kazunori ; Miyata, Takashi ; Hasida, Kôiti ; Okuno, Hiroshi G. / Empirical verification of Meaning-Game-based generalization of centering theory with large Japanese corpus. PACLIC 19 - Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation. 2005.
@inproceedings{eefac5939c164a7dbea3697d0c190588,
title = "Empirical verification of Meaning-Game-based generalization of centering theory with large Japanese corpus",
abstract = "Centering theory (Grosz et al., 1995) tries to explain relations among attention, anaphora, and cohesion. It has two theoretical limitations. The first is the lack of a principle behind these discourse phenomena. The second is that the salience of discourse entities has not been quantitatively defined, although it plays a critical role in this theory. Hasida et al. (1995, 1996) propose the meaning game as a more principled model of intentional communication based on game theory, and claim that it can derive centering theory. This claim, however, has not yet been verified on the basis of substantial linguistic data. In this paper, we formulate salience as a measurable quantity in terms of a reference probability. We also formulate preferences subsuming centering theory under this quantitative formulation of salience. The preferences are derived from the meaning game and entail more general predictions than those of conventional centering theory. These formulations overcome the above limitations of centering theory. By following them, we empirically verify our generalization with a large Japanese corpus. The experimental results show that there is positive correlation between the salience (reference probability) of an entity and the simplicity (utility) of a noun phrase which refers to the entity. They also indicate correspondence between the values of expected utility and the ranking of the transition states. These results indicate that our generalization is appropriate.",
author = "Shun Shiramatsu and Kazunori Komatani and Takashi Miyata and K{\^o}iti Hasida and Okuno, {Hiroshi G.}",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
booktitle = "PACLIC 19 - Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Empirical verification of Meaning-Game-based generalization of centering theory with large Japanese corpus

AU - Shiramatsu, Shun

AU - Komatani, Kazunori

AU - Miyata, Takashi

AU - Hasida, Kôiti

AU - Okuno, Hiroshi G.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Centering theory (Grosz et al., 1995) tries to explain relations among attention, anaphora, and cohesion. It has two theoretical limitations. The first is the lack of a principle behind these discourse phenomena. The second is that the salience of discourse entities has not been quantitatively defined, although it plays a critical role in this theory. Hasida et al. (1995, 1996) propose the meaning game as a more principled model of intentional communication based on game theory, and claim that it can derive centering theory. This claim, however, has not yet been verified on the basis of substantial linguistic data. In this paper, we formulate salience as a measurable quantity in terms of a reference probability. We also formulate preferences subsuming centering theory under this quantitative formulation of salience. The preferences are derived from the meaning game and entail more general predictions than those of conventional centering theory. These formulations overcome the above limitations of centering theory. By following them, we empirically verify our generalization with a large Japanese corpus. The experimental results show that there is positive correlation between the salience (reference probability) of an entity and the simplicity (utility) of a noun phrase which refers to the entity. They also indicate correspondence between the values of expected utility and the ranking of the transition states. These results indicate that our generalization is appropriate.

AB - Centering theory (Grosz et al., 1995) tries to explain relations among attention, anaphora, and cohesion. It has two theoretical limitations. The first is the lack of a principle behind these discourse phenomena. The second is that the salience of discourse entities has not been quantitatively defined, although it plays a critical role in this theory. Hasida et al. (1995, 1996) propose the meaning game as a more principled model of intentional communication based on game theory, and claim that it can derive centering theory. This claim, however, has not yet been verified on the basis of substantial linguistic data. In this paper, we formulate salience as a measurable quantity in terms of a reference probability. We also formulate preferences subsuming centering theory under this quantitative formulation of salience. The preferences are derived from the meaning game and entail more general predictions than those of conventional centering theory. These formulations overcome the above limitations of centering theory. By following them, we empirically verify our generalization with a large Japanese corpus. The experimental results show that there is positive correlation between the salience (reference probability) of an entity and the simplicity (utility) of a noun phrase which refers to the entity. They also indicate correspondence between the values of expected utility and the ranking of the transition states. These results indicate that our generalization is appropriate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864303923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864303923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - PACLIC 19 - Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation

ER -