Abstract
It was found that numerical calculations involving the Bogoliubovde Gennes (BdG) modes with l = 2 and 4 were incorrect in the original paper. The results of the calculations affected are in Figs. 2 3 58 and in Table I. We revise them with the correct figures and table. The parameter sets A and B are updated according to the parameter fitting in Figs. 2 and 5: the parameter sets A ( O = 1.80 V r = 422 MeV ) and B ( O = 2.42 V r = 399 MeV ) . The qualitative discussion presented in the original paper remains essentially intact because the numerical results have only slightly changed. (Figure Presented).
Original language  English 

Article number  049901 
Journal  Physical Review C 
Volume  98 
Issue number  4 
DOIs 

Publication status  Published  2018 Oct 15 
Externally published  Yes 
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
 Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Cite this
Erratum : Effective field theory of BoseEinstein condensation of α clusters and NambuGoldstoneHiggs states in C 12 (Physical Review C (2016) 94 (014314) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.014314). / Nakamura, Y.; Takahashi, Junichi; Yamanaka, Yoshiya; Ohkubo, S.
In: Physical Review C, Vol. 98, No. 4, 049901, 15.10.2018.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
}
TY  JOUR
T1  Erratum
T2  Effective field theory of BoseEinstein condensation of α clusters and NambuGoldstoneHiggs states in C 12 (Physical Review C (2016) 94 (014314) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.014314)
AU  Nakamura, Y.
AU  Takahashi, Junichi
AU  Yamanaka, Yoshiya
AU  Ohkubo, S.
PY  2018/10/15
Y1  2018/10/15
N2  It was found that numerical calculations involving the Bogoliubovde Gennes (BdG) modes with l = 2 and 4 were incorrect in the original paper. The results of the calculations affected are in Figs. 2 3 58 and in Table I. We revise them with the correct figures and table. The parameter sets A and B are updated according to the parameter fitting in Figs. 2 and 5: the parameter sets A ( O = 1.80 V r = 422 MeV ) and B ( O = 2.42 V r = 399 MeV ) . The qualitative discussion presented in the original paper remains essentially intact because the numerical results have only slightly changed. (Figure Presented).
AB  It was found that numerical calculations involving the Bogoliubovde Gennes (BdG) modes with l = 2 and 4 were incorrect in the original paper. The results of the calculations affected are in Figs. 2 3 58 and in Table I. We revise them with the correct figures and table. The parameter sets A and B are updated according to the parameter fitting in Figs. 2 and 5: the parameter sets A ( O = 1.80 V r = 422 MeV ) and B ( O = 2.42 V r = 399 MeV ) . The qualitative discussion presented in the original paper remains essentially intact because the numerical results have only slightly changed. (Figure Presented).
UR  http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055346925&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR  http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055346925&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2  10.1103/PhysRevC.98.049901
DO  10.1103/PhysRevC.98.049901
M3  Comment/debate
AN  SCOPUS:85055346925
VL  98
JO  Physical Review C
JF  Physical Review C
SN  24699985
IS  4
M1  049901
ER 