Erratum: Effective field theory of Bose-Einstein condensation of α clusters and Nambu-Goldstone-Higgs states in C 12 (Physical Review C (2016) 94 (014314) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.014314)

Y. Nakamura, Junichi Takahashi, Yoshiya Yamanaka, S. Ohkubo

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

It was found that numerical calculations involving the Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) modes with l = 2 and 4 were incorrect in the original paper. The results of the calculations affected are in Figs. 2 3 5-8 and in Table I. We revise them with the correct figures and table. The parameter sets A and B are updated according to the parameter fitting in Figs. 2 and 5: the parameter sets A ( O = 1.80 V r = 422 MeV ) and B ( O = 2.42 V r = 399 MeV ) . The qualitative discussion presented in the original paper remains essentially intact because the numerical results have only slightly changed. (Figure Presented).

Original languageEnglish
Article number049901
JournalPhysical Review C
Volume98
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Oct 15
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

condensation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Cite this

@article{03f6fb95ccb843bb8d0469c080b83596,
title = "Erratum: Effective field theory of Bose-Einstein condensation of α clusters and Nambu-Goldstone-Higgs states in C 12 (Physical Review C (2016) 94 (014314) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.014314)",
abstract = "It was found that numerical calculations involving the Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) modes with l = 2 and 4 were incorrect in the original paper. The results of the calculations affected are in Figs. 2 3 5-8 and in Table I. We revise them with the correct figures and table. The parameter sets A and B are updated according to the parameter fitting in Figs. 2 and 5: the parameter sets A ( O = 1.80 V r = 422 MeV ) and B ( O = 2.42 V r = 399 MeV ) . The qualitative discussion presented in the original paper remains essentially intact because the numerical results have only slightly changed. (Figure Presented).",
author = "Y. Nakamura and Junichi Takahashi and Yoshiya Yamanaka and S. Ohkubo",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevC.98.049901",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
journal = "Physical Review C",
issn = "2469-9985",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - Effective field theory of Bose-Einstein condensation of α clusters and Nambu-Goldstone-Higgs states in C 12 (Physical Review C (2016) 94 (014314) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.014314)

AU - Nakamura, Y.

AU - Takahashi, Junichi

AU - Yamanaka, Yoshiya

AU - Ohkubo, S.

PY - 2018/10/15

Y1 - 2018/10/15

N2 - It was found that numerical calculations involving the Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) modes with l = 2 and 4 were incorrect in the original paper. The results of the calculations affected are in Figs. 2 3 5-8 and in Table I. We revise them with the correct figures and table. The parameter sets A and B are updated according to the parameter fitting in Figs. 2 and 5: the parameter sets A ( O = 1.80 V r = 422 MeV ) and B ( O = 2.42 V r = 399 MeV ) . The qualitative discussion presented in the original paper remains essentially intact because the numerical results have only slightly changed. (Figure Presented).

AB - It was found that numerical calculations involving the Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) modes with l = 2 and 4 were incorrect in the original paper. The results of the calculations affected are in Figs. 2 3 5-8 and in Table I. We revise them with the correct figures and table. The parameter sets A and B are updated according to the parameter fitting in Figs. 2 and 5: the parameter sets A ( O = 1.80 V r = 422 MeV ) and B ( O = 2.42 V r = 399 MeV ) . The qualitative discussion presented in the original paper remains essentially intact because the numerical results have only slightly changed. (Figure Presented).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055346925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055346925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.049901

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.049901

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85055346925

VL - 98

JO - Physical Review C

JF - Physical Review C

SN - 2469-9985

IS - 4

M1 - 049901

ER -