Estimating hominid life history: the critical interbirth interval

Wataru Nakahashi, Shiro Horiuchi, Yasuo Ihara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Unlike any great apes, humans have expanded into a wide variety of habitats during the course of evolution, beginning with the transition by australopithecines from forest to savanna habitation. Novel environments are likely to have imposed hominids a demographic challenge due to such factors as higher predation risk and scarcer food resources. In fact, recent studies have found a paucity of older relative to younger adults in hominid fossil remains, indicating considerably high adult mortality in australopithecines, early Homo, and Neanderthals. It is not clear to date why only human ancestors among all hominoid species could survive in these harsh environments. In this paper, we explore the possibility that hominids had shorter interbirth intervals to enhance fertility than the extant apes. To infer interbirth intervals in fossil hominids, we introduce the notion of the critical interbirth interval, or the threshold length of birth spacing above which a population is expected to go to extinction. We develop a new method to obtain the critical interbirth intervals of hominids based on the observed ratios of older adults to all adults in fossil samples. Our analysis suggests that the critical interbirth intervals of australopithecines, early Homo, and Neanderthals are significantly shorter than the observed interbirth intervals of extant great apes. We also discuss possible factors that may have caused the evolutionary divergence of hominid life history traits from those of great apes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalPopulation Ecology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2018 Apr 23

Fingerprint

hominid
Hominidae
life history
Pongidae
Neanderthal
fossil
fossils
Homo
predation risk
divergent evolution
life history trait
ancestry
savanna
fertility
young adults
spacing
savannas
extinction
divergence
demographic statistics

Keywords

  • Demography
  • Gompertz model
  • Human evolution
  • Paternal care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Estimating hominid life history : the critical interbirth interval. / Nakahashi, Wataru; Horiuchi, Shiro; Ihara, Yasuo.

In: Population Ecology, 23.04.2018, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{db953d8a946c492d8a716cfe4ae032a3,
title = "Estimating hominid life history: the critical interbirth interval",
abstract = "Unlike any great apes, humans have expanded into a wide variety of habitats during the course of evolution, beginning with the transition by australopithecines from forest to savanna habitation. Novel environments are likely to have imposed hominids a demographic challenge due to such factors as higher predation risk and scarcer food resources. In fact, recent studies have found a paucity of older relative to younger adults in hominid fossil remains, indicating considerably high adult mortality in australopithecines, early Homo, and Neanderthals. It is not clear to date why only human ancestors among all hominoid species could survive in these harsh environments. In this paper, we explore the possibility that hominids had shorter interbirth intervals to enhance fertility than the extant apes. To infer interbirth intervals in fossil hominids, we introduce the notion of the critical interbirth interval, or the threshold length of birth spacing above which a population is expected to go to extinction. We develop a new method to obtain the critical interbirth intervals of hominids based on the observed ratios of older adults to all adults in fossil samples. Our analysis suggests that the critical interbirth intervals of australopithecines, early Homo, and Neanderthals are significantly shorter than the observed interbirth intervals of extant great apes. We also discuss possible factors that may have caused the evolutionary divergence of hominid life history traits from those of great apes.",
keywords = "Demography, Gompertz model, Human evolution, Paternal care",
author = "Wataru Nakahashi and Shiro Horiuchi and Yasuo Ihara",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1007/s10144-018-0610-0",
language = "English",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Population Ecology",
issn = "1438-3896",
publisher = "Springer Japan",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating hominid life history

T2 - the critical interbirth interval

AU - Nakahashi, Wataru

AU - Horiuchi, Shiro

AU - Ihara, Yasuo

PY - 2018/4/23

Y1 - 2018/4/23

N2 - Unlike any great apes, humans have expanded into a wide variety of habitats during the course of evolution, beginning with the transition by australopithecines from forest to savanna habitation. Novel environments are likely to have imposed hominids a demographic challenge due to such factors as higher predation risk and scarcer food resources. In fact, recent studies have found a paucity of older relative to younger adults in hominid fossil remains, indicating considerably high adult mortality in australopithecines, early Homo, and Neanderthals. It is not clear to date why only human ancestors among all hominoid species could survive in these harsh environments. In this paper, we explore the possibility that hominids had shorter interbirth intervals to enhance fertility than the extant apes. To infer interbirth intervals in fossil hominids, we introduce the notion of the critical interbirth interval, or the threshold length of birth spacing above which a population is expected to go to extinction. We develop a new method to obtain the critical interbirth intervals of hominids based on the observed ratios of older adults to all adults in fossil samples. Our analysis suggests that the critical interbirth intervals of australopithecines, early Homo, and Neanderthals are significantly shorter than the observed interbirth intervals of extant great apes. We also discuss possible factors that may have caused the evolutionary divergence of hominid life history traits from those of great apes.

AB - Unlike any great apes, humans have expanded into a wide variety of habitats during the course of evolution, beginning with the transition by australopithecines from forest to savanna habitation. Novel environments are likely to have imposed hominids a demographic challenge due to such factors as higher predation risk and scarcer food resources. In fact, recent studies have found a paucity of older relative to younger adults in hominid fossil remains, indicating considerably high adult mortality in australopithecines, early Homo, and Neanderthals. It is not clear to date why only human ancestors among all hominoid species could survive in these harsh environments. In this paper, we explore the possibility that hominids had shorter interbirth intervals to enhance fertility than the extant apes. To infer interbirth intervals in fossil hominids, we introduce the notion of the critical interbirth interval, or the threshold length of birth spacing above which a population is expected to go to extinction. We develop a new method to obtain the critical interbirth intervals of hominids based on the observed ratios of older adults to all adults in fossil samples. Our analysis suggests that the critical interbirth intervals of australopithecines, early Homo, and Neanderthals are significantly shorter than the observed interbirth intervals of extant great apes. We also discuss possible factors that may have caused the evolutionary divergence of hominid life history traits from those of great apes.

KW - Demography

KW - Gompertz model

KW - Human evolution

KW - Paternal care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045850440&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045850440&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10144-018-0610-0

DO - 10.1007/s10144-018-0610-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045850440

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Population Ecology

JF - Population Ecology

SN - 1438-3896

ER -