Evaluation of chemical fluorescent dyes as a protein conjugation partner for live cell imaging

Yoko Hayashi-Takanaka, Timothy J. Stasevich, Hitoshi Kurumizaka, Naohito Nozaki, Hiroshi Kimura

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    23 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    To optimize live cell fluorescence imaging, the choice of fluorescent substrate is a critical factor. Although genetically encoded fluorescent proteins have been used widely, chemical fluorescent dyes are still useful when conjugated to proteins or ligands. However, little information is available for the suitability of different fluorescent dyes for live imaging. We here systematically analyzed the property of a number of commercial fluorescent dyes when conjugated with antigen-binding (Fab) fragments directed against specific histone modifications, in particular, phosphorylated H3S28 (H3S28ph) and acetylated H3K9 (H3K9ac). These Fab fragments were conjugated with a fluorescent dye and loaded into living HeLa cells. H3S28ph-specific Fab fragments were expected to be enriched in condensed chromosomes, as H3S28 is phosphorylated during mitosis. However, the degree of Fab fragment enrichment on mitotic chromosomes varied depending on the conjugated dye. In general, green fluorescent dyes showed higher enrichment, compared to red and far-red fluorescent dyes, even when dye:protein conjugation ratios were similar. These differences are partly explained by an altered affinity of Fab fragment after dye-conjugation; some dyes have less effect on the affinity, while others can affect it more. Moreover, red and far-red fluorescent dyes tended to form aggregates in the cytoplasm. Similar results were observed when H3K9ac-specific Fab fragments were used, suggesting that the properties of each dye affect different Fab fragments similarly. According to our analysis, conjugation with green fluorescent dyes, like Alexa Fluor 488 and Dylight 488, has the least effect on Fab affinity and is the best for live cell imaging, although these dyes are less photostable than red fluorescent dyes. When multicolor imaging is required, we recommend the following dye combinations for optimal results: Alexa Fluor 488 (green), Cy3 (red), and Cy5 or CF640 (far-red).

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere106271
    JournalPLoS One
    Volume9
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    fluorescent dyes
    Fluorescent Dyes
    Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments
    image analysis
    dyes
    Imaging techniques
    Coloring Agents
    Proteins
    proteins
    cells
    Chromosomes
    Histone Code
    chromosomes
    Optical Imaging
    protein aggregates
    HeLa Cells
    Mitosis
    histones
    Histones
    mitosis

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
    • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
    • Medicine(all)

    Cite this

    Hayashi-Takanaka, Y., Stasevich, T. J., Kurumizaka, H., Nozaki, N., & Kimura, H. (2014). Evaluation of chemical fluorescent dyes as a protein conjugation partner for live cell imaging. PLoS One, 9(9), [e106271]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106271

    Evaluation of chemical fluorescent dyes as a protein conjugation partner for live cell imaging. / Hayashi-Takanaka, Yoko; Stasevich, Timothy J.; Kurumizaka, Hitoshi; Nozaki, Naohito; Kimura, Hiroshi.

    In: PLoS One, Vol. 9, No. 9, e106271, 2014.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Hayashi-Takanaka, Y, Stasevich, TJ, Kurumizaka, H, Nozaki, N & Kimura, H 2014, 'Evaluation of chemical fluorescent dyes as a protein conjugation partner for live cell imaging', PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 9, e106271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106271
    Hayashi-Takanaka, Yoko ; Stasevich, Timothy J. ; Kurumizaka, Hitoshi ; Nozaki, Naohito ; Kimura, Hiroshi. / Evaluation of chemical fluorescent dyes as a protein conjugation partner for live cell imaging. In: PLoS One. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 9.
    @article{ccfb22b88999477e9968d7b18ce2609a,
    title = "Evaluation of chemical fluorescent dyes as a protein conjugation partner for live cell imaging",
    abstract = "To optimize live cell fluorescence imaging, the choice of fluorescent substrate is a critical factor. Although genetically encoded fluorescent proteins have been used widely, chemical fluorescent dyes are still useful when conjugated to proteins or ligands. However, little information is available for the suitability of different fluorescent dyes for live imaging. We here systematically analyzed the property of a number of commercial fluorescent dyes when conjugated with antigen-binding (Fab) fragments directed against specific histone modifications, in particular, phosphorylated H3S28 (H3S28ph) and acetylated H3K9 (H3K9ac). These Fab fragments were conjugated with a fluorescent dye and loaded into living HeLa cells. H3S28ph-specific Fab fragments were expected to be enriched in condensed chromosomes, as H3S28 is phosphorylated during mitosis. However, the degree of Fab fragment enrichment on mitotic chromosomes varied depending on the conjugated dye. In general, green fluorescent dyes showed higher enrichment, compared to red and far-red fluorescent dyes, even when dye:protein conjugation ratios were similar. These differences are partly explained by an altered affinity of Fab fragment after dye-conjugation; some dyes have less effect on the affinity, while others can affect it more. Moreover, red and far-red fluorescent dyes tended to form aggregates in the cytoplasm. Similar results were observed when H3K9ac-specific Fab fragments were used, suggesting that the properties of each dye affect different Fab fragments similarly. According to our analysis, conjugation with green fluorescent dyes, like Alexa Fluor 488 and Dylight 488, has the least effect on Fab affinity and is the best for live cell imaging, although these dyes are less photostable than red fluorescent dyes. When multicolor imaging is required, we recommend the following dye combinations for optimal results: Alexa Fluor 488 (green), Cy3 (red), and Cy5 or CF640 (far-red).",
    author = "Yoko Hayashi-Takanaka and Stasevich, {Timothy J.} and Hitoshi Kurumizaka and Naohito Nozaki and Hiroshi Kimura",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0106271",
    language = "English",
    volume = "9",
    journal = "PLoS One",
    issn = "1932-6203",
    publisher = "Public Library of Science",
    number = "9",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Evaluation of chemical fluorescent dyes as a protein conjugation partner for live cell imaging

    AU - Hayashi-Takanaka, Yoko

    AU - Stasevich, Timothy J.

    AU - Kurumizaka, Hitoshi

    AU - Nozaki, Naohito

    AU - Kimura, Hiroshi

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - To optimize live cell fluorescence imaging, the choice of fluorescent substrate is a critical factor. Although genetically encoded fluorescent proteins have been used widely, chemical fluorescent dyes are still useful when conjugated to proteins or ligands. However, little information is available for the suitability of different fluorescent dyes for live imaging. We here systematically analyzed the property of a number of commercial fluorescent dyes when conjugated with antigen-binding (Fab) fragments directed against specific histone modifications, in particular, phosphorylated H3S28 (H3S28ph) and acetylated H3K9 (H3K9ac). These Fab fragments were conjugated with a fluorescent dye and loaded into living HeLa cells. H3S28ph-specific Fab fragments were expected to be enriched in condensed chromosomes, as H3S28 is phosphorylated during mitosis. However, the degree of Fab fragment enrichment on mitotic chromosomes varied depending on the conjugated dye. In general, green fluorescent dyes showed higher enrichment, compared to red and far-red fluorescent dyes, even when dye:protein conjugation ratios were similar. These differences are partly explained by an altered affinity of Fab fragment after dye-conjugation; some dyes have less effect on the affinity, while others can affect it more. Moreover, red and far-red fluorescent dyes tended to form aggregates in the cytoplasm. Similar results were observed when H3K9ac-specific Fab fragments were used, suggesting that the properties of each dye affect different Fab fragments similarly. According to our analysis, conjugation with green fluorescent dyes, like Alexa Fluor 488 and Dylight 488, has the least effect on Fab affinity and is the best for live cell imaging, although these dyes are less photostable than red fluorescent dyes. When multicolor imaging is required, we recommend the following dye combinations for optimal results: Alexa Fluor 488 (green), Cy3 (red), and Cy5 or CF640 (far-red).

    AB - To optimize live cell fluorescence imaging, the choice of fluorescent substrate is a critical factor. Although genetically encoded fluorescent proteins have been used widely, chemical fluorescent dyes are still useful when conjugated to proteins or ligands. However, little information is available for the suitability of different fluorescent dyes for live imaging. We here systematically analyzed the property of a number of commercial fluorescent dyes when conjugated with antigen-binding (Fab) fragments directed against specific histone modifications, in particular, phosphorylated H3S28 (H3S28ph) and acetylated H3K9 (H3K9ac). These Fab fragments were conjugated with a fluorescent dye and loaded into living HeLa cells. H3S28ph-specific Fab fragments were expected to be enriched in condensed chromosomes, as H3S28 is phosphorylated during mitosis. However, the degree of Fab fragment enrichment on mitotic chromosomes varied depending on the conjugated dye. In general, green fluorescent dyes showed higher enrichment, compared to red and far-red fluorescent dyes, even when dye:protein conjugation ratios were similar. These differences are partly explained by an altered affinity of Fab fragment after dye-conjugation; some dyes have less effect on the affinity, while others can affect it more. Moreover, red and far-red fluorescent dyes tended to form aggregates in the cytoplasm. Similar results were observed when H3K9ac-specific Fab fragments were used, suggesting that the properties of each dye affect different Fab fragments similarly. According to our analysis, conjugation with green fluorescent dyes, like Alexa Fluor 488 and Dylight 488, has the least effect on Fab affinity and is the best for live cell imaging, although these dyes are less photostable than red fluorescent dyes. When multicolor imaging is required, we recommend the following dye combinations for optimal results: Alexa Fluor 488 (green), Cy3 (red), and Cy5 or CF640 (far-red).

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906959809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906959809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0106271

    DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0106271

    M3 - Article

    VL - 9

    JO - PLoS One

    JF - PLoS One

    SN - 1932-6203

    IS - 9

    M1 - e106271

    ER -