Examining biases in the single-member district tier of Taiwan's electoral system

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Two elections to the Legislative Yuan have been held under a mixed parallel system. While there have been criticisms that this new set of rules leads to a considerable disparity between parties ' vote and seat shares in the district tier, in so far as the new electoral system has been accepted and therefore treated as given by both parties and voters, its fairness should be assessed not by the degree of proportionality, but rather by examining various sources of potential bias. These include differences in electorate sizes and turnout rates across districts, and the efficiency by which votes for the main parties 'candidates are distributed. The present study investigates how "fair " the functioning of Taiwan 's new mixed parallel system was in the 2008 and 2012 legislative elections by simulating equal and reverse vote scenarios at the district level, and measuring the magnitude of each component of electoral bias. The results show that the operation of the electoral system entails no marked partisan bias, since it does not consistently confer an advantage to either of the main parties or camps.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)47-74
    Number of pages28
    JournalIssues and Studies
    Volume49
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    electoral system
    Taiwan
    voter
    district
    trend
    election
    proportionality
    fairness
    criticism
    candidacy
    scenario
    efficiency

    Keywords

    • Electoral system
    • Legislative elections
    • Mixed parallel system
    • Partisan bias
    • Single-member districts

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Political Science and International Relations
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Examining biases in the single-member district tier of Taiwan's electoral system. / Jou, Willy.

    In: Issues and Studies, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2013, p. 47-74.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{63bac1c684724697b953df2e25bd486f,
    title = "Examining biases in the single-member district tier of Taiwan's electoral system",
    abstract = "Two elections to the Legislative Yuan have been held under a mixed parallel system. While there have been criticisms that this new set of rules leads to a considerable disparity between parties ' vote and seat shares in the district tier, in so far as the new electoral system has been accepted and therefore treated as given by both parties and voters, its fairness should be assessed not by the degree of proportionality, but rather by examining various sources of potential bias. These include differences in electorate sizes and turnout rates across districts, and the efficiency by which votes for the main parties 'candidates are distributed. The present study investigates how {"}fair {"} the functioning of Taiwan 's new mixed parallel system was in the 2008 and 2012 legislative elections by simulating equal and reverse vote scenarios at the district level, and measuring the magnitude of each component of electoral bias. The results show that the operation of the electoral system entails no marked partisan bias, since it does not consistently confer an advantage to either of the main parties or camps.",
    keywords = "Electoral system, Legislative elections, Mixed parallel system, Partisan bias, Single-member districts",
    author = "Willy Jou",
    year = "2013",
    language = "English",
    volume = "49",
    pages = "47--74",
    journal = "Issues and Studies",
    issn = "1013-2511",
    publisher = "Institute of International Relations",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Examining biases in the single-member district tier of Taiwan's electoral system

    AU - Jou, Willy

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - Two elections to the Legislative Yuan have been held under a mixed parallel system. While there have been criticisms that this new set of rules leads to a considerable disparity between parties ' vote and seat shares in the district tier, in so far as the new electoral system has been accepted and therefore treated as given by both parties and voters, its fairness should be assessed not by the degree of proportionality, but rather by examining various sources of potential bias. These include differences in electorate sizes and turnout rates across districts, and the efficiency by which votes for the main parties 'candidates are distributed. The present study investigates how "fair " the functioning of Taiwan 's new mixed parallel system was in the 2008 and 2012 legislative elections by simulating equal and reverse vote scenarios at the district level, and measuring the magnitude of each component of electoral bias. The results show that the operation of the electoral system entails no marked partisan bias, since it does not consistently confer an advantage to either of the main parties or camps.

    AB - Two elections to the Legislative Yuan have been held under a mixed parallel system. While there have been criticisms that this new set of rules leads to a considerable disparity between parties ' vote and seat shares in the district tier, in so far as the new electoral system has been accepted and therefore treated as given by both parties and voters, its fairness should be assessed not by the degree of proportionality, but rather by examining various sources of potential bias. These include differences in electorate sizes and turnout rates across districts, and the efficiency by which votes for the main parties 'candidates are distributed. The present study investigates how "fair " the functioning of Taiwan 's new mixed parallel system was in the 2008 and 2012 legislative elections by simulating equal and reverse vote scenarios at the district level, and measuring the magnitude of each component of electoral bias. The results show that the operation of the electoral system entails no marked partisan bias, since it does not consistently confer an advantage to either of the main parties or camps.

    KW - Electoral system

    KW - Legislative elections

    KW - Mixed parallel system

    KW - Partisan bias

    KW - Single-member districts

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896954381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896954381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84896954381

    VL - 49

    SP - 47

    EP - 74

    JO - Issues and Studies

    JF - Issues and Studies

    SN - 1013-2511

    IS - 4

    ER -