Exploring decentralized forest management in Ethiopia using actor-power-accountability framework

Case study in West Shoa zone

Abrar Juhar Mohammed, Makoto Inoue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Decentralized forest management is a pivotal approach in Ethiopia for balancing biodiversity conservation with demand for economic development, and for improving forest-dependent local peoples' livelihoods. With the aim of filling the literature gap on Ethiopia, this paper explores the dynamics of decentralization in the forestry sector using the actor-power-accountability framework. Generally, three forms of decentralization are practiced: deconcentration to government administrative branches, devolution of selected decision-making power to local people, and delegation to enterprises. Although transfer of meaningful discretionary power to local people or to downwardly accountable lower-tier governments is a precondition for achieving positive outcomes from decentralization, this prerequisite has been realized in none of the three forms decentralization. Overall, three important trends emerged from the latest decentralization reform, which was a switch from the conservation-oriented deconcentration form of decentralization to the income generation-oriented delegation form of decentralization. Those trends are as follows: monetary income generation for local people through enterprise, albeit with possible risk of being deprived of income and subsistence opportunities on which local people depend for their livelihoods; moving decision-making power away from the grassroots; and lack of incentive to manage natural forests, a major source of biodiversity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)807-825
Number of pages19
JournalEnvironment, Development and Sustainability
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

accountability
Ethiopia
decentralization
forest management
responsibility
management
income
biodiversity
livelihood
decision making
conservation
devolution
Decentralization
Accountability
Forest management
subsistence
trend
forestry
incentive
economic development

Keywords

  • Accountability
  • Actor
  • Decentralization
  • Ethiopia
  • Forest
  • Power

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{3a06d78923504651a3c3db8afd2dd95a,
title = "Exploring decentralized forest management in Ethiopia using actor-power-accountability framework: Case study in West Shoa zone",
abstract = "Decentralized forest management is a pivotal approach in Ethiopia for balancing biodiversity conservation with demand for economic development, and for improving forest-dependent local peoples' livelihoods. With the aim of filling the literature gap on Ethiopia, this paper explores the dynamics of decentralization in the forestry sector using the actor-power-accountability framework. Generally, three forms of decentralization are practiced: deconcentration to government administrative branches, devolution of selected decision-making power to local people, and delegation to enterprises. Although transfer of meaningful discretionary power to local people or to downwardly accountable lower-tier governments is a precondition for achieving positive outcomes from decentralization, this prerequisite has been realized in none of the three forms decentralization. Overall, three important trends emerged from the latest decentralization reform, which was a switch from the conservation-oriented deconcentration form of decentralization to the income generation-oriented delegation form of decentralization. Those trends are as follows: monetary income generation for local people through enterprise, albeit with possible risk of being deprived of income and subsistence opportunities on which local people depend for their livelihoods; moving decision-making power away from the grassroots; and lack of incentive to manage natural forests, a major source of biodiversity.",
keywords = "Accountability, Actor, Decentralization, Ethiopia, Forest, Power",
author = "Mohammed, {Abrar Juhar} and Makoto Inoue",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s10668-012-9407-z",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "807--825",
journal = "Environment, Development and Sustainability",
issn = "1387-585X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring decentralized forest management in Ethiopia using actor-power-accountability framework

T2 - Case study in West Shoa zone

AU - Mohammed, Abrar Juhar

AU - Inoue, Makoto

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Decentralized forest management is a pivotal approach in Ethiopia for balancing biodiversity conservation with demand for economic development, and for improving forest-dependent local peoples' livelihoods. With the aim of filling the literature gap on Ethiopia, this paper explores the dynamics of decentralization in the forestry sector using the actor-power-accountability framework. Generally, three forms of decentralization are practiced: deconcentration to government administrative branches, devolution of selected decision-making power to local people, and delegation to enterprises. Although transfer of meaningful discretionary power to local people or to downwardly accountable lower-tier governments is a precondition for achieving positive outcomes from decentralization, this prerequisite has been realized in none of the three forms decentralization. Overall, three important trends emerged from the latest decentralization reform, which was a switch from the conservation-oriented deconcentration form of decentralization to the income generation-oriented delegation form of decentralization. Those trends are as follows: monetary income generation for local people through enterprise, albeit with possible risk of being deprived of income and subsistence opportunities on which local people depend for their livelihoods; moving decision-making power away from the grassroots; and lack of incentive to manage natural forests, a major source of biodiversity.

AB - Decentralized forest management is a pivotal approach in Ethiopia for balancing biodiversity conservation with demand for economic development, and for improving forest-dependent local peoples' livelihoods. With the aim of filling the literature gap on Ethiopia, this paper explores the dynamics of decentralization in the forestry sector using the actor-power-accountability framework. Generally, three forms of decentralization are practiced: deconcentration to government administrative branches, devolution of selected decision-making power to local people, and delegation to enterprises. Although transfer of meaningful discretionary power to local people or to downwardly accountable lower-tier governments is a precondition for achieving positive outcomes from decentralization, this prerequisite has been realized in none of the three forms decentralization. Overall, three important trends emerged from the latest decentralization reform, which was a switch from the conservation-oriented deconcentration form of decentralization to the income generation-oriented delegation form of decentralization. Those trends are as follows: monetary income generation for local people through enterprise, albeit with possible risk of being deprived of income and subsistence opportunities on which local people depend for their livelihoods; moving decision-making power away from the grassroots; and lack of incentive to manage natural forests, a major source of biodiversity.

KW - Accountability

KW - Actor

KW - Decentralization

KW - Ethiopia

KW - Forest

KW - Power

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876563516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876563516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10668-012-9407-z

DO - 10.1007/s10668-012-9407-z

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 807

EP - 825

JO - Environment, Development and Sustainability

JF - Environment, Development and Sustainability

SN - 1387-585X

IS - 3

ER -