TY - GEN
T1 - Exploring the use of light and display indicators for communicating directional intent
AU - Shrestha, Moondeep C.
AU - Kobayashi, Ayano
AU - Onishi, Tomoya
AU - Yanagawa, Hayato
AU - Yokoyama, Yuta
AU - Uno, Erika
AU - Schmitz, Alexander
AU - Kamezaki, Mitsuhiro
AU - Sugano, Shigeki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IEEE.
PY - 2016/9/26
Y1 - 2016/9/26
N2 - Legible robot behavior is a key element for smooth and efficient navigation among humans. However, at present, even the state-of-the-art robots cannot communicate its internal state of directional intent by displaying human-like non-verbal cues. In this paper, we explore various modes for communicating directional intent of a robot across three different scenarios as a means of overcoming the shortcomings of the robot's non-verbal communication abilities. Specifically, we look into turn indicators, display indicators, and their combinations with sound and investigate their effectiveness across different passing scenarios. Our study shows us that using auxiliary communicating methods significantly improves the perceived feelings of our dependent measures. Further, communicating intention also helps in improving cooperation. However, the effectiveness greatly varies with the modes and the passing scenarios. In the case of 90 degrees crossing scenario, even though participants have positive perceived feelings, this does not necessarily translate into smooth and efficient navigation.
AB - Legible robot behavior is a key element for smooth and efficient navigation among humans. However, at present, even the state-of-the-art robots cannot communicate its internal state of directional intent by displaying human-like non-verbal cues. In this paper, we explore various modes for communicating directional intent of a robot across three different scenarios as a means of overcoming the shortcomings of the robot's non-verbal communication abilities. Specifically, we look into turn indicators, display indicators, and their combinations with sound and investigate their effectiveness across different passing scenarios. Our study shows us that using auxiliary communicating methods significantly improves the perceived feelings of our dependent measures. Further, communicating intention also helps in improving cooperation. However, the effectiveness greatly varies with the modes and the passing scenarios. In the case of 90 degrees crossing scenario, even though participants have positive perceived feelings, this does not necessarily translate into smooth and efficient navigation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992365194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992365194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/AIM.2016.7577007
DO - 10.1109/AIM.2016.7577007
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84992365194
T3 - IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, AIM
SP - 1651
EP - 1656
BT - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, AIM 2016
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, AIM 2016
Y2 - 12 July 2016 through 15 July 2016
ER -