Facticity and poietics in history

Miki Kiyoshi's reading of Heidegger

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Modern Japanese thinkers tried to understand "history" as processes of translation through which the Japanese culture/society/nation integrated itself into world history. This paper analyzes Miki Kiyoshi's (1897-1945) Philosophy of History (1932), a prominent example of such an approach to history. His understanding of history is deeply influenced by Martin Heidegger's thoughts about facticity. The most essential part of Miki's notion of "history" lies in his practico-poietic conception of history, which is elaborated through his own interpretation of Heidegger (via Marx). This paper attempts to investigate how Miki developed such a practico-poietic theory as well as how he was faced with its limit, not only on a theoretical level, but also in the specific historical contexts in the 1930s and 1940s. To seek answers to these questions enables us to understand why Miki came to re-create philosophical discourse to describe the space of history in approaching the question of translation, that is, the question concerning the transformation by and through language.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)893-910
Number of pages18
JournalPhilosophy Today
Volume60
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Sep 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

History
Martin Heidegger
Facticity
Philosophical Discourse
Karl Marx
Philosophy of History
1930s
Thinkers
Japanese Culture
Language
Historical Context
Conception
1940s
World History

Keywords

  • Facticity
  • Martin Heidegger
  • Miki Kiyoshi
  • Poiêsis
  • Translation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Cite this

Facticity and poietics in history : Miki Kiyoshi's reading of Heidegger. / Nishiyama, Tatsuya.

In: Philosophy Today, Vol. 60, No. 4, 01.09.2016, p. 893-910.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{7bd1e2aaea974250b63cae79438ee05f,
title = "Facticity and poietics in history: Miki Kiyoshi's reading of Heidegger",
abstract = "Modern Japanese thinkers tried to understand {"}history{"} as processes of translation through which the Japanese culture/society/nation integrated itself into world history. This paper analyzes Miki Kiyoshi's (1897-1945) Philosophy of History (1932), a prominent example of such an approach to history. His understanding of history is deeply influenced by Martin Heidegger's thoughts about facticity. The most essential part of Miki's notion of {"}history{"} lies in his practico-poietic conception of history, which is elaborated through his own interpretation of Heidegger (via Marx). This paper attempts to investigate how Miki developed such a practico-poietic theory as well as how he was faced with its limit, not only on a theoretical level, but also in the specific historical contexts in the 1930s and 1940s. To seek answers to these questions enables us to understand why Miki came to re-create philosophical discourse to describe the space of history in approaching the question of translation, that is, the question concerning the transformation by and through language.",
keywords = "Facticity, Martin Heidegger, Miki Kiyoshi, Poi{\^e}sis, Translation",
author = "Tatsuya Nishiyama",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5840/philtoday2016113135",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "893--910",
journal = "Philosophy Today",
issn = "0031-8256",
publisher = "Depaul University, Department of Philosophy",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facticity and poietics in history

T2 - Miki Kiyoshi's reading of Heidegger

AU - Nishiyama, Tatsuya

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Modern Japanese thinkers tried to understand "history" as processes of translation through which the Japanese culture/society/nation integrated itself into world history. This paper analyzes Miki Kiyoshi's (1897-1945) Philosophy of History (1932), a prominent example of such an approach to history. His understanding of history is deeply influenced by Martin Heidegger's thoughts about facticity. The most essential part of Miki's notion of "history" lies in his practico-poietic conception of history, which is elaborated through his own interpretation of Heidegger (via Marx). This paper attempts to investigate how Miki developed such a practico-poietic theory as well as how he was faced with its limit, not only on a theoretical level, but also in the specific historical contexts in the 1930s and 1940s. To seek answers to these questions enables us to understand why Miki came to re-create philosophical discourse to describe the space of history in approaching the question of translation, that is, the question concerning the transformation by and through language.

AB - Modern Japanese thinkers tried to understand "history" as processes of translation through which the Japanese culture/society/nation integrated itself into world history. This paper analyzes Miki Kiyoshi's (1897-1945) Philosophy of History (1932), a prominent example of such an approach to history. His understanding of history is deeply influenced by Martin Heidegger's thoughts about facticity. The most essential part of Miki's notion of "history" lies in his practico-poietic conception of history, which is elaborated through his own interpretation of Heidegger (via Marx). This paper attempts to investigate how Miki developed such a practico-poietic theory as well as how he was faced with its limit, not only on a theoretical level, but also in the specific historical contexts in the 1930s and 1940s. To seek answers to these questions enables us to understand why Miki came to re-create philosophical discourse to describe the space of history in approaching the question of translation, that is, the question concerning the transformation by and through language.

KW - Facticity

KW - Martin Heidegger

KW - Miki Kiyoshi

KW - Poiêsis

KW - Translation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009097221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009097221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5840/philtoday2016113135

DO - 10.5840/philtoday2016113135

M3 - Review article

VL - 60

SP - 893

EP - 910

JO - Philosophy Today

JF - Philosophy Today

SN - 0031-8256

IS - 4

ER -