Factors affecting individual variation in nestdefense intensity in colonially breeding Blacktailed Gulls (Larus crassirostris)

Kentaro Kazama, Yasuaki Niizuma, Kentaro Q. Sakamoto, Yutaka Watanuki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The physiological state of parent birds combined with the value of their clutch may affect the intensity of their nest defense. In colonially breeding birds, nest-defense intensity may also be affected by the behavior of neighbors. We investigated individual variation in the nest-defense intensity among colonial Black-tailed Gulls (Larus crassirostris Vieillot, 1818) over 2 years. Only 30%-40% of males attacked a decoy of an egg predator (Large-billed Crow (Corvus macrorhynchos Wagler, 1827)), and the other males and females rarely attacked. Males attacking the decoy had higher levels of plasma testosterone than males that did not attack. Each male's, but not female's, nest-defense intensity was consistent throughout the incubation period and also across years. The intensity was not related to egg-laying date, clutch size, or age of offspring. The intensity was likely to be higher when individuals had one or more neighbors, representing higher nest-defense intensity in the year where gulls had larger number of adjacent neighboring nests (5.23 nests), but this trend was not observed in the year where they had smaller number of the neighboring nests (3.73 nests). Thus, in addition to testosterone levels, behavior of neighbors also influences the nest-defense intensity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)938-944
Number of pages7
JournalCanadian Journal of Zoology
Volume89
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Oct 1
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Factors affecting individual variation in nestdefense intensity in colonially breeding Blacktailed Gulls (Larus crassirostris)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this