Factors affecting participation of user group members

Comparative studies on two types of community forestry in the Dry Zone, Myanmar

Ei Ei Swe Hlaing, Makoto Inoue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing on the example of community forestry in Myanmar's Dry Zone area, this paper conceptualizes and empirically assesses key factors for obtaining the participation of user group members, with emphasis on the implementation stage. More specifically, the study clarifies the commonalities and differences in influential factors between two types of community forestry: agroforestry and natural forest types. Field data were collected by semi-structured interviews with 54 households in four selected user groups, by key informant interviews, by informal interviews, and by direct observations. Our analysis was conducted in accordance with a framework in which selected social/institutional, economic, and physical factors affect participation. The results show that social/institutional factors are the most influential factors in both types, while economic factors are directly related to participation of user groups in the agroforestry type alone. Results indicated that preconditions, such as selection of leaders, should be considered in accordance with the local context in which the people have a shared recognition of what confers legitimacy to leadership. We recommend collaboration of the Forest Department with user group members in providing information regarding the use and selling of forest products from agroforestry-type community forest, as well as frequent communication with user groups to provide incentives regarding property rights stability for future benefits to continue participation of user group members in managing the dry forest.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)60-72
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Forest Research
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

community forestry
Myanmar
agroforestry
arid zones
interviews
comparative study
property rights
economic factors
leadership
forest products
forest communities
dry forests
communication (human)
forest types
households
forest product
dry forest
economics
incentive
communication

Keywords

  • Community forestry
  • Dry Zone
  • Myanmar
  • Participation
  • User group members

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry

Cite this

@article{72f10219103f4a258ac71f23952df29b,
title = "Factors affecting participation of user group members: Comparative studies on two types of community forestry in the Dry Zone, Myanmar",
abstract = "Drawing on the example of community forestry in Myanmar's Dry Zone area, this paper conceptualizes and empirically assesses key factors for obtaining the participation of user group members, with emphasis on the implementation stage. More specifically, the study clarifies the commonalities and differences in influential factors between two types of community forestry: agroforestry and natural forest types. Field data were collected by semi-structured interviews with 54 households in four selected user groups, by key informant interviews, by informal interviews, and by direct observations. Our analysis was conducted in accordance with a framework in which selected social/institutional, economic, and physical factors affect participation. The results show that social/institutional factors are the most influential factors in both types, while economic factors are directly related to participation of user groups in the agroforestry type alone. Results indicated that preconditions, such as selection of leaders, should be considered in accordance with the local context in which the people have a shared recognition of what confers legitimacy to leadership. We recommend collaboration of the Forest Department with user group members in providing information regarding the use and selling of forest products from agroforestry-type community forest, as well as frequent communication with user groups to provide incentives regarding property rights stability for future benefits to continue participation of user group members in managing the dry forest.",
keywords = "Community forestry, Dry Zone, Myanmar, Participation, User group members",
author = "Hlaing, {Ei Ei Swe} and Makoto Inoue",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s10310-011-0328-8",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "60--72",
journal = "Journal of Forest Research",
issn = "1341-6979",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors affecting participation of user group members

T2 - Comparative studies on two types of community forestry in the Dry Zone, Myanmar

AU - Hlaing, Ei Ei Swe

AU - Inoue, Makoto

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Drawing on the example of community forestry in Myanmar's Dry Zone area, this paper conceptualizes and empirically assesses key factors for obtaining the participation of user group members, with emphasis on the implementation stage. More specifically, the study clarifies the commonalities and differences in influential factors between two types of community forestry: agroforestry and natural forest types. Field data were collected by semi-structured interviews with 54 households in four selected user groups, by key informant interviews, by informal interviews, and by direct observations. Our analysis was conducted in accordance with a framework in which selected social/institutional, economic, and physical factors affect participation. The results show that social/institutional factors are the most influential factors in both types, while economic factors are directly related to participation of user groups in the agroforestry type alone. Results indicated that preconditions, such as selection of leaders, should be considered in accordance with the local context in which the people have a shared recognition of what confers legitimacy to leadership. We recommend collaboration of the Forest Department with user group members in providing information regarding the use and selling of forest products from agroforestry-type community forest, as well as frequent communication with user groups to provide incentives regarding property rights stability for future benefits to continue participation of user group members in managing the dry forest.

AB - Drawing on the example of community forestry in Myanmar's Dry Zone area, this paper conceptualizes and empirically assesses key factors for obtaining the participation of user group members, with emphasis on the implementation stage. More specifically, the study clarifies the commonalities and differences in influential factors between two types of community forestry: agroforestry and natural forest types. Field data were collected by semi-structured interviews with 54 households in four selected user groups, by key informant interviews, by informal interviews, and by direct observations. Our analysis was conducted in accordance with a framework in which selected social/institutional, economic, and physical factors affect participation. The results show that social/institutional factors are the most influential factors in both types, while economic factors are directly related to participation of user groups in the agroforestry type alone. Results indicated that preconditions, such as selection of leaders, should be considered in accordance with the local context in which the people have a shared recognition of what confers legitimacy to leadership. We recommend collaboration of the Forest Department with user group members in providing information regarding the use and selling of forest products from agroforestry-type community forest, as well as frequent communication with user groups to provide incentives regarding property rights stability for future benefits to continue participation of user group members in managing the dry forest.

KW - Community forestry

KW - Dry Zone

KW - Myanmar

KW - Participation

KW - User group members

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873712800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873712800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10310-011-0328-8

DO - 10.1007/s10310-011-0328-8

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 60

EP - 72

JO - Journal of Forest Research

JF - Journal of Forest Research

SN - 1341-6979

IS - 1

ER -