Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks

Graham Caithness, Rieko Osu, Paul Bays, Henry Chase, Jessica Klassen, Mitsuo Kawato, Daniel M. Wolpert, J. Randall Flanagan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

173 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An influential idea in human motor learning is that there is a consolidation period during which motor memories are transformed from a fragile to a permanent state, no longer susceptible to interference from new learning. The evidence supporting this idea comes from studies showing that the motor memory of a task (A) is lost when an opposing task (B) is experienced soon after, but not if sufficient time is allowed to pass (∼6 hr). We report results from three laboratories challenging this consolidation idea. We used an ABA paradigm in the context of a reaching task to assess the influence of experiencing B after A on the retention of A. In two experiments using visuomotor rotations, we found that B fully interferes with the retention of A even when B is experienced 24 hr after A. Contrary to previous reports, in four experiments on learning force fields, we also observed full interference between A and B when they are separated by 24 hr or even 1 week. This latter result holds for both position-dependent and velocity-dependent force fields. For both the visuomotor and force-field tasks, complete interference is still observed when the possible affects of anterograde interference are controlled through the use of washout trials. Our results fail to support the idea that motor memories become consolidated into a protected state. Rather, they are consistent with recent ideas of memory formation, which propose that memories can shift between active and inactive states.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8662-8671
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume24
Issue number40
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004 Oct 6
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Learning
Advisory Committees
Retention (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Arm movement
  • Force field
  • Internal models
  • Motor learning
  • Retrograde interference
  • Visuomotor rotation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks. / Caithness, Graham; Osu, Rieko; Bays, Paul; Chase, Henry; Klassen, Jessica; Kawato, Mitsuo; Wolpert, Daniel M.; Flanagan, J. Randall.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 24, No. 40, 06.10.2004, p. 8662-8671.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Caithness, G, Osu, R, Bays, P, Chase, H, Klassen, J, Kawato, M, Wolpert, DM & Flanagan, JR 2004, 'Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks', Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 40, pp. 8662-8671. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2214-04.2004
Caithness, Graham ; Osu, Rieko ; Bays, Paul ; Chase, Henry ; Klassen, Jessica ; Kawato, Mitsuo ; Wolpert, Daniel M. ; Flanagan, J. Randall. / Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks. In: Journal of Neuroscience. 2004 ; Vol. 24, No. 40. pp. 8662-8671.
@article{f197cf5257594d28b2fb3cf0d77bce19,
title = "Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks",
abstract = "An influential idea in human motor learning is that there is a consolidation period during which motor memories are transformed from a fragile to a permanent state, no longer susceptible to interference from new learning. The evidence supporting this idea comes from studies showing that the motor memory of a task (A) is lost when an opposing task (B) is experienced soon after, but not if sufficient time is allowed to pass (∼6 hr). We report results from three laboratories challenging this consolidation idea. We used an ABA paradigm in the context of a reaching task to assess the influence of experiencing B after A on the retention of A. In two experiments using visuomotor rotations, we found that B fully interferes with the retention of A even when B is experienced 24 hr after A. Contrary to previous reports, in four experiments on learning force fields, we also observed full interference between A and B when they are separated by 24 hr or even 1 week. This latter result holds for both position-dependent and velocity-dependent force fields. For both the visuomotor and force-field tasks, complete interference is still observed when the possible affects of anterograde interference are controlled through the use of washout trials. Our results fail to support the idea that motor memories become consolidated into a protected state. Rather, they are consistent with recent ideas of memory formation, which propose that memories can shift between active and inactive states.",
keywords = "Arm movement, Force field, Internal models, Motor learning, Retrograde interference, Visuomotor rotation",
author = "Graham Caithness and Rieko Osu and Paul Bays and Henry Chase and Jessica Klassen and Mitsuo Kawato and Wolpert, {Daniel M.} and Flanagan, {J. Randall}",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2214-04.2004",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "8662--8671",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "40",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks

AU - Caithness, Graham

AU - Osu, Rieko

AU - Bays, Paul

AU - Chase, Henry

AU - Klassen, Jessica

AU - Kawato, Mitsuo

AU - Wolpert, Daniel M.

AU - Flanagan, J. Randall

PY - 2004/10/6

Y1 - 2004/10/6

N2 - An influential idea in human motor learning is that there is a consolidation period during which motor memories are transformed from a fragile to a permanent state, no longer susceptible to interference from new learning. The evidence supporting this idea comes from studies showing that the motor memory of a task (A) is lost when an opposing task (B) is experienced soon after, but not if sufficient time is allowed to pass (∼6 hr). We report results from three laboratories challenging this consolidation idea. We used an ABA paradigm in the context of a reaching task to assess the influence of experiencing B after A on the retention of A. In two experiments using visuomotor rotations, we found that B fully interferes with the retention of A even when B is experienced 24 hr after A. Contrary to previous reports, in four experiments on learning force fields, we also observed full interference between A and B when they are separated by 24 hr or even 1 week. This latter result holds for both position-dependent and velocity-dependent force fields. For both the visuomotor and force-field tasks, complete interference is still observed when the possible affects of anterograde interference are controlled through the use of washout trials. Our results fail to support the idea that motor memories become consolidated into a protected state. Rather, they are consistent with recent ideas of memory formation, which propose that memories can shift between active and inactive states.

AB - An influential idea in human motor learning is that there is a consolidation period during which motor memories are transformed from a fragile to a permanent state, no longer susceptible to interference from new learning. The evidence supporting this idea comes from studies showing that the motor memory of a task (A) is lost when an opposing task (B) is experienced soon after, but not if sufficient time is allowed to pass (∼6 hr). We report results from three laboratories challenging this consolidation idea. We used an ABA paradigm in the context of a reaching task to assess the influence of experiencing B after A on the retention of A. In two experiments using visuomotor rotations, we found that B fully interferes with the retention of A even when B is experienced 24 hr after A. Contrary to previous reports, in four experiments on learning force fields, we also observed full interference between A and B when they are separated by 24 hr or even 1 week. This latter result holds for both position-dependent and velocity-dependent force fields. For both the visuomotor and force-field tasks, complete interference is still observed when the possible affects of anterograde interference are controlled through the use of washout trials. Our results fail to support the idea that motor memories become consolidated into a protected state. Rather, they are consistent with recent ideas of memory formation, which propose that memories can shift between active and inactive states.

KW - Arm movement

KW - Force field

KW - Internal models

KW - Motor learning

KW - Retrograde interference

KW - Visuomotor rotation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=5444270048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=5444270048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2214-04.2004

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2214-04.2004

M3 - Article

C2 - 15470131

AN - SCOPUS:5444270048

VL - 24

SP - 8662

EP - 8671

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 40

ER -