TY - JOUR
T1 - Family firms, firm characteristics, and corporate social performance
T2 - A study of public firms in Japan
AU - Aoi, Michikazu
AU - Asaba, Shigeru
AU - Kubota, Keiichi
AU - Takehara, Hitoshi
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank valuable comments and suggestions from the editor and three anonymous referees, who helped improve the exposition of this paper. The paper was previously presented at the Eighth Asia Academy of Management Conference in Seoul 2013, the 2012 Japan Finance Association Annual Meeting in Tokyo, the 2012 Annual IFERA World Family Business Research Conference in Bordeaux, the 2012 Eastern Japan Meeting of the Japan Finance Association in Tokyo, the 2012 Southwestern Finance Association Annual Meeting in New Orleans, and the 2011 International Conference on Ownership, Management Control, and Family Businesses: Theory and Evidence at Nanzan University, Nagoya. The authors also thank Kais Bouslah, Britta Boyd, Zhaoyang Gu, Hideaki Kato, Hiroshi Maruyama, Vincent Molly, Tak Wakasugi, and Yasushi Yoshida for their helpful comments. The authors thank Sasson Bar-Yosef, Chihiro Iwai, Akira Komatsu, Annalisa Prencipe, and Megumi Suto for useful discussion. Michikazu Aoi, Shigeru Asaba, Keiichi Kubota, and Hitoshi Takehara acknowledge financial support from the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research ((A) 21243029 (A) 25245052, and (C) 24530581) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. Hitoshi Takehara acknowledges financial support from the Health Labour Sciences Research Grant (Research on Policy Planning and Evaluation). All remaining errors are our own.
PY - 2015/10/12
Y1 - 2015/10/12
N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore corporate social performance attained by listed family and non-family firms in Japan. They are measured by the composite CSP index and five attributes composed of employ relations, social contributions (SCs), firm security and product safety, internal governance and risk control, and environment concern. Design/methodology/approach – The authors employ univariate and regression analyses on the quantitatively aggregated CSP score data of Japanese firms from 2007 to 2009. Findings – Japan non-family firms tend to perform better than family firms in terms of attaining corporate social performance overall. Family CEOs positively affect CSP in the foods, textiles and apparels, and pharmaceutical industries as well as in retail trade, wholesale, and services industries, but negatively affect CSP in the heavy manufacturing industry. In these industries the joint effect of the percentage of family shareholdings and the fraction of family members on the board also augments the positive role played by family CEO. The findings are robust when the sample is ranked by Tobin’s q. Research limitations/implications – The observation period is short due to the data availability of CSP by Toyo Keizai Inc. This data covers all the listed firms which answered the questionnaire, which may also contain sample selection problems. Practical implications – Positive role of CEO and negative effects of shareholdings among listed family firms in Japan call for attention and corrective measures for top management and family shareholders. Social implications – While family firms in Japan may accumulate socioemotional wealth, they should exert more efforts to advance CSP and create social capital. Originality/value – This is the first comprehensive quantitative study in the field, which explored CSP of all the listed family firms vs non-family firms in Japan with large sample.
AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore corporate social performance attained by listed family and non-family firms in Japan. They are measured by the composite CSP index and five attributes composed of employ relations, social contributions (SCs), firm security and product safety, internal governance and risk control, and environment concern. Design/methodology/approach – The authors employ univariate and regression analyses on the quantitatively aggregated CSP score data of Japanese firms from 2007 to 2009. Findings – Japan non-family firms tend to perform better than family firms in terms of attaining corporate social performance overall. Family CEOs positively affect CSP in the foods, textiles and apparels, and pharmaceutical industries as well as in retail trade, wholesale, and services industries, but negatively affect CSP in the heavy manufacturing industry. In these industries the joint effect of the percentage of family shareholdings and the fraction of family members on the board also augments the positive role played by family CEO. The findings are robust when the sample is ranked by Tobin’s q. Research limitations/implications – The observation period is short due to the data availability of CSP by Toyo Keizai Inc. This data covers all the listed firms which answered the questionnaire, which may also contain sample selection problems. Practical implications – Positive role of CEO and negative effects of shareholdings among listed family firms in Japan call for attention and corrective measures for top management and family shareholders. Social implications – While family firms in Japan may accumulate socioemotional wealth, they should exert more efforts to advance CSP and create social capital. Originality/value – This is the first comprehensive quantitative study in the field, which explored CSP of all the listed family firms vs non-family firms in Japan with large sample.
KW - Board membership
KW - Corporate social performance
KW - Family CEO
KW - Family firms in Japan
KW - Family shareholdings
KW - Tobin’s q
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975267140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975267140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/JFBM-08-2013-0019
DO - 10.1108/JFBM-08-2013-0019
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84975267140
VL - 5
SP - 192
EP - 217
JO - Journal of Family Business Management
JF - Journal of Family Business Management
SN - 2043-6238
IS - 2
ER -