Flash-lag chimeras: The role of perceived alignment in the composite face effect

Beena Khurana, R. McKell Carter, Katsumi Watanabe, Romi Nijhawan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Spatial alignment of different face halves results in a configuration that mars the recognition of the identity of either face half (Young, Hellawell, & Hay, 1987). What would happen to the recognition performance for face halves that were aligned on the retina but were perceived as misaligned, or were misaligned on the retina but were perceived as aligned? We used the 'flash-lag' effect (Nijhawan, 1994) to address these questions. We created chimeras consisting of a stationary top half-face initially aligned with a moving bottom half-face. Flash-lag chimeras were better recognized than their stationary counterparts. However when flashed face halves were presented physically ahead of moving halves thereby nulling the flash-lag effect, recognition was impaired. This counters the notion that relative movement between the two face halves per se is sufficient to explain better recognition of flash-lag chimeras. Thus, the perceived spatial alignment of face halves (despite retinal misalignment) impairs recognition, while perceived misalignment (despite retinal alignment) does not.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2757-2772
Number of pages16
JournalVision Research
Volume46
Issue number17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Sep
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Retina
Mars

Keywords

  • Configural encoding
  • Face recognition
  • Facial form
  • Flash-lag effect
  • Movement filter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Flash-lag chimeras : The role of perceived alignment in the composite face effect. / Khurana, Beena; Carter, R. McKell; Watanabe, Katsumi; Nijhawan, Romi.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 46, No. 17, 09.2006, p. 2757-2772.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Khurana, Beena ; Carter, R. McKell ; Watanabe, Katsumi ; Nijhawan, Romi. / Flash-lag chimeras : The role of perceived alignment in the composite face effect. In: Vision Research. 2006 ; Vol. 46, No. 17. pp. 2757-2772.
@article{e19f302fc5234fc889a0166c67f52a09,
title = "Flash-lag chimeras: The role of perceived alignment in the composite face effect",
abstract = "Spatial alignment of different face halves results in a configuration that mars the recognition of the identity of either face half (Young, Hellawell, & Hay, 1987). What would happen to the recognition performance for face halves that were aligned on the retina but were perceived as misaligned, or were misaligned on the retina but were perceived as aligned? We used the 'flash-lag' effect (Nijhawan, 1994) to address these questions. We created chimeras consisting of a stationary top half-face initially aligned with a moving bottom half-face. Flash-lag chimeras were better recognized than their stationary counterparts. However when flashed face halves were presented physically ahead of moving halves thereby nulling the flash-lag effect, recognition was impaired. This counters the notion that relative movement between the two face halves per se is sufficient to explain better recognition of flash-lag chimeras. Thus, the perceived spatial alignment of face halves (despite retinal misalignment) impairs recognition, while perceived misalignment (despite retinal alignment) does not.",
keywords = "Configural encoding, Face recognition, Facial form, Flash-lag effect, Movement filter",
author = "Beena Khurana and Carter, {R. McKell} and Katsumi Watanabe and Romi Nijhawan",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2006.02.001",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "2757--2772",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flash-lag chimeras

T2 - The role of perceived alignment in the composite face effect

AU - Khurana, Beena

AU - Carter, R. McKell

AU - Watanabe, Katsumi

AU - Nijhawan, Romi

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - Spatial alignment of different face halves results in a configuration that mars the recognition of the identity of either face half (Young, Hellawell, & Hay, 1987). What would happen to the recognition performance for face halves that were aligned on the retina but were perceived as misaligned, or were misaligned on the retina but were perceived as aligned? We used the 'flash-lag' effect (Nijhawan, 1994) to address these questions. We created chimeras consisting of a stationary top half-face initially aligned with a moving bottom half-face. Flash-lag chimeras were better recognized than their stationary counterparts. However when flashed face halves were presented physically ahead of moving halves thereby nulling the flash-lag effect, recognition was impaired. This counters the notion that relative movement between the two face halves per se is sufficient to explain better recognition of flash-lag chimeras. Thus, the perceived spatial alignment of face halves (despite retinal misalignment) impairs recognition, while perceived misalignment (despite retinal alignment) does not.

AB - Spatial alignment of different face halves results in a configuration that mars the recognition of the identity of either face half (Young, Hellawell, & Hay, 1987). What would happen to the recognition performance for face halves that were aligned on the retina but were perceived as misaligned, or were misaligned on the retina but were perceived as aligned? We used the 'flash-lag' effect (Nijhawan, 1994) to address these questions. We created chimeras consisting of a stationary top half-face initially aligned with a moving bottom half-face. Flash-lag chimeras were better recognized than their stationary counterparts. However when flashed face halves were presented physically ahead of moving halves thereby nulling the flash-lag effect, recognition was impaired. This counters the notion that relative movement between the two face halves per se is sufficient to explain better recognition of flash-lag chimeras. Thus, the perceived spatial alignment of face halves (despite retinal misalignment) impairs recognition, while perceived misalignment (despite retinal alignment) does not.

KW - Configural encoding

KW - Face recognition

KW - Facial form

KW - Flash-lag effect

KW - Movement filter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646160985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646160985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2006.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2006.02.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 16545419

AN - SCOPUS:33646160985

VL - 46

SP - 2757

EP - 2772

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 17

ER -