Fukushima fallout: Gauging the change in Japanese nuclear energy policy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Fukushima nuclear disaster is a special case: a major twin natural disaster (earthquake and tsunami) incited a large-scale technological disaster, which resulted in a serious nuclear accident. Because the various costs are so tremendous, this triple disaster has had a pervasive impact on all aspects of life in Japan. This article describes nuclear energy policy transformation in the aftermath of the Fukushim a disaster. The study draws on theoretical propositions of governance and disaster risk governance, and demonstrates that a vested interest perspective is important to understanding the results of Japan’s energy policy before Fukushima. Safety, democracy, and openness were the fundamental principles of Japan’s nuclear energy policy when the country decided to diversify its energy sources in the 1950s. But these basic premises were undermined by the vested interests that controlled policy administration and implementation as the nuclear energy industry developed. Analysis of Japan’s recent nuclear energy policy transformation covers such dimensions as policy targets, policy issues such as safety, the fuel cycle, waste disposal, administrative structure, public awareness, and national and local policy considerations. The study identifies process deficiencies in Japan’s post-Fukushima nuclear energy policy transformation and evaluates possible ways to eliminate defects through administrative reorganization and independent safety oversight.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-83
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fallout
nuclear energy
Gaging
Energy policy
energy policy
fallout
Nuclear energy
Disasters
disaster
Japan
safety
natural disaster
governance
energy industry
nuclear accident
administrative framework
administrative structure
waste disposal
energy source
reorganization

Keywords

  • Japan
  • nuclear energy policy
  • nuclear safety
  • vested interest structure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Safety Research
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Fukushima fallout : Gauging the change in Japanese nuclear energy policy. / Shadrina, Elena.

In: International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, Vol. 3, No. 2, 01.01.2012, p. 69-83.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{57e4053aa1e04ce98af6a98771d46446,
title = "Fukushima fallout: Gauging the change in Japanese nuclear energy policy",
abstract = "The Fukushima nuclear disaster is a special case: a major twin natural disaster (earthquake and tsunami) incited a large-scale technological disaster, which resulted in a serious nuclear accident. Because the various costs are so tremendous, this triple disaster has had a pervasive impact on all aspects of life in Japan. This article describes nuclear energy policy transformation in the aftermath of the Fukushim a disaster. The study draws on theoretical propositions of governance and disaster risk governance, and demonstrates that a vested interest perspective is important to understanding the results of Japan’s energy policy before Fukushima. Safety, democracy, and openness were the fundamental principles of Japan’s nuclear energy policy when the country decided to diversify its energy sources in the 1950s. But these basic premises were undermined by the vested interests that controlled policy administration and implementation as the nuclear energy industry developed. Analysis of Japan’s recent nuclear energy policy transformation covers such dimensions as policy targets, policy issues such as safety, the fuel cycle, waste disposal, administrative structure, public awareness, and national and local policy considerations. The study identifies process deficiencies in Japan’s post-Fukushima nuclear energy policy transformation and evaluates possible ways to eliminate defects through administrative reorganization and independent safety oversight.",
keywords = "Japan, nuclear energy policy, nuclear safety, vested interest structure",
author = "Elena Shadrina",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13753-012-0008-0",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "69--83",
journal = "International Journal of Disaster Risk Science",
issn = "2095-0055",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fukushima fallout

T2 - Gauging the change in Japanese nuclear energy policy

AU - Shadrina, Elena

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - The Fukushima nuclear disaster is a special case: a major twin natural disaster (earthquake and tsunami) incited a large-scale technological disaster, which resulted in a serious nuclear accident. Because the various costs are so tremendous, this triple disaster has had a pervasive impact on all aspects of life in Japan. This article describes nuclear energy policy transformation in the aftermath of the Fukushim a disaster. The study draws on theoretical propositions of governance and disaster risk governance, and demonstrates that a vested interest perspective is important to understanding the results of Japan’s energy policy before Fukushima. Safety, democracy, and openness were the fundamental principles of Japan’s nuclear energy policy when the country decided to diversify its energy sources in the 1950s. But these basic premises were undermined by the vested interests that controlled policy administration and implementation as the nuclear energy industry developed. Analysis of Japan’s recent nuclear energy policy transformation covers such dimensions as policy targets, policy issues such as safety, the fuel cycle, waste disposal, administrative structure, public awareness, and national and local policy considerations. The study identifies process deficiencies in Japan’s post-Fukushima nuclear energy policy transformation and evaluates possible ways to eliminate defects through administrative reorganization and independent safety oversight.

AB - The Fukushima nuclear disaster is a special case: a major twin natural disaster (earthquake and tsunami) incited a large-scale technological disaster, which resulted in a serious nuclear accident. Because the various costs are so tremendous, this triple disaster has had a pervasive impact on all aspects of life in Japan. This article describes nuclear energy policy transformation in the aftermath of the Fukushim a disaster. The study draws on theoretical propositions of governance and disaster risk governance, and demonstrates that a vested interest perspective is important to understanding the results of Japan’s energy policy before Fukushima. Safety, democracy, and openness were the fundamental principles of Japan’s nuclear energy policy when the country decided to diversify its energy sources in the 1950s. But these basic premises were undermined by the vested interests that controlled policy administration and implementation as the nuclear energy industry developed. Analysis of Japan’s recent nuclear energy policy transformation covers such dimensions as policy targets, policy issues such as safety, the fuel cycle, waste disposal, administrative structure, public awareness, and national and local policy considerations. The study identifies process deficiencies in Japan’s post-Fukushima nuclear energy policy transformation and evaluates possible ways to eliminate defects through administrative reorganization and independent safety oversight.

KW - Japan

KW - nuclear energy policy

KW - nuclear safety

KW - vested interest structure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889883297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889883297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13753-012-0008-0

DO - 10.1007/s13753-012-0008-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84889883297

VL - 3

SP - 69

EP - 83

JO - International Journal of Disaster Risk Science

JF - International Journal of Disaster Risk Science

SN - 2095-0055

IS - 2

ER -