Gender differences in hip and ankle joint kinematics on knee abduction during running

Masanori Sakaguchi, Haruna Ogawa, Norifumi Shimizu, Hiroaki Kanehisa, Toshimasa Yanai, Yasuo Kawakami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The knee is the most common site of running injuries, particularly prevalent in females. The purpose of this study was to clarify gender differences in the lower extremity kinematics during running, with a specific emphasis on the relationships between the distal and proximal factors and the knee joint kinematics. Eleven female and 11 male runners participated in this study. Three-dimensional marker positions were recorded with a motion analysis system while the subjects ran along a 25 m runway at a speed of 3.5 m/s. Kinematic variables were analyzed for the stance phase of the right leg. Female runners demonstrated significantly greater peak knee abduction (P<0.05), hip adduction (P<0.01) and internal rotation (P<0.05), whereas male runners demonstrated significantly greater peak rearfoot eversion (P<0.01). The knee abduction angles were positively correlated with hip adduction angles (r=0.49, P<0.05) and negatively correlated with rearfoot eversion (r= -0.69, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in normalised step width between genders (P>0.05). Smaller rearfoot eversion and greater hip adduction related closely to the greater knee abduction as the distal and proximal factors, respectively. These relationships are thought to be the compensatory joint motions in the frontal plane, because there was no significant difference in the normalised step width between females and males. The current results suggest that if the step width is identical, the subjects with greater knee abduction had smaller rearfoot eversion to compensate for greater hip adduction, which were more apparent in females. This explains greater knee abduction found in female runners, which can be linked to a high risk of knee injury.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Sport Science
Volume14
Issue numberSUPPL.1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jan

Fingerprint

Ankle Joint
Hip Joint
Biomechanical Phenomena
Knee
Hip
Knee Injuries
Knee Joint
Lower Extremity
Leg
Joints
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • female
  • frontal plane motions
  • male
  • Running injury
  • step width

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Gender differences in hip and ankle joint kinematics on knee abduction during running. / Sakaguchi, Masanori; Ogawa, Haruna; Shimizu, Norifumi; Kanehisa, Hiroaki; Yanai, Toshimasa; Kawakami, Yasuo.

In: European Journal of Sport Science, Vol. 14, No. SUPPL.1, 01.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sakaguchi, Masanori ; Ogawa, Haruna ; Shimizu, Norifumi ; Kanehisa, Hiroaki ; Yanai, Toshimasa ; Kawakami, Yasuo. / Gender differences in hip and ankle joint kinematics on knee abduction during running. In: European Journal of Sport Science. 2014 ; Vol. 14, No. SUPPL.1.
@article{79efe5c1ad684754afa6266d0d3f92f8,
title = "Gender differences in hip and ankle joint kinematics on knee abduction during running",
abstract = "The knee is the most common site of running injuries, particularly prevalent in females. The purpose of this study was to clarify gender differences in the lower extremity kinematics during running, with a specific emphasis on the relationships between the distal and proximal factors and the knee joint kinematics. Eleven female and 11 male runners participated in this study. Three-dimensional marker positions were recorded with a motion analysis system while the subjects ran along a 25 m runway at a speed of 3.5 m/s. Kinematic variables were analyzed for the stance phase of the right leg. Female runners demonstrated significantly greater peak knee abduction (P<0.05), hip adduction (P<0.01) and internal rotation (P<0.05), whereas male runners demonstrated significantly greater peak rearfoot eversion (P<0.01). The knee abduction angles were positively correlated with hip adduction angles (r=0.49, P<0.05) and negatively correlated with rearfoot eversion (r= -0.69, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in normalised step width between genders (P>0.05). Smaller rearfoot eversion and greater hip adduction related closely to the greater knee abduction as the distal and proximal factors, respectively. These relationships are thought to be the compensatory joint motions in the frontal plane, because there was no significant difference in the normalised step width between females and males. The current results suggest that if the step width is identical, the subjects with greater knee abduction had smaller rearfoot eversion to compensate for greater hip adduction, which were more apparent in females. This explains greater knee abduction found in female runners, which can be linked to a high risk of knee injury.",
keywords = "female, frontal plane motions, male, Running injury, step width",
author = "Masanori Sakaguchi and Haruna Ogawa and Norifumi Shimizu and Hiroaki Kanehisa and Toshimasa Yanai and Yasuo Kawakami",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1080/17461391.2012.693953",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "European Journal of Sport Science",
issn = "1746-1391",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "SUPPL.1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender differences in hip and ankle joint kinematics on knee abduction during running

AU - Sakaguchi, Masanori

AU - Ogawa, Haruna

AU - Shimizu, Norifumi

AU - Kanehisa, Hiroaki

AU - Yanai, Toshimasa

AU - Kawakami, Yasuo

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - The knee is the most common site of running injuries, particularly prevalent in females. The purpose of this study was to clarify gender differences in the lower extremity kinematics during running, with a specific emphasis on the relationships between the distal and proximal factors and the knee joint kinematics. Eleven female and 11 male runners participated in this study. Three-dimensional marker positions were recorded with a motion analysis system while the subjects ran along a 25 m runway at a speed of 3.5 m/s. Kinematic variables were analyzed for the stance phase of the right leg. Female runners demonstrated significantly greater peak knee abduction (P<0.05), hip adduction (P<0.01) and internal rotation (P<0.05), whereas male runners demonstrated significantly greater peak rearfoot eversion (P<0.01). The knee abduction angles were positively correlated with hip adduction angles (r=0.49, P<0.05) and negatively correlated with rearfoot eversion (r= -0.69, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in normalised step width between genders (P>0.05). Smaller rearfoot eversion and greater hip adduction related closely to the greater knee abduction as the distal and proximal factors, respectively. These relationships are thought to be the compensatory joint motions in the frontal plane, because there was no significant difference in the normalised step width between females and males. The current results suggest that if the step width is identical, the subjects with greater knee abduction had smaller rearfoot eversion to compensate for greater hip adduction, which were more apparent in females. This explains greater knee abduction found in female runners, which can be linked to a high risk of knee injury.

AB - The knee is the most common site of running injuries, particularly prevalent in females. The purpose of this study was to clarify gender differences in the lower extremity kinematics during running, with a specific emphasis on the relationships between the distal and proximal factors and the knee joint kinematics. Eleven female and 11 male runners participated in this study. Three-dimensional marker positions were recorded with a motion analysis system while the subjects ran along a 25 m runway at a speed of 3.5 m/s. Kinematic variables were analyzed for the stance phase of the right leg. Female runners demonstrated significantly greater peak knee abduction (P<0.05), hip adduction (P<0.01) and internal rotation (P<0.05), whereas male runners demonstrated significantly greater peak rearfoot eversion (P<0.01). The knee abduction angles were positively correlated with hip adduction angles (r=0.49, P<0.05) and negatively correlated with rearfoot eversion (r= -0.69, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in normalised step width between genders (P>0.05). Smaller rearfoot eversion and greater hip adduction related closely to the greater knee abduction as the distal and proximal factors, respectively. These relationships are thought to be the compensatory joint motions in the frontal plane, because there was no significant difference in the normalised step width between females and males. The current results suggest that if the step width is identical, the subjects with greater knee abduction had smaller rearfoot eversion to compensate for greater hip adduction, which were more apparent in females. This explains greater knee abduction found in female runners, which can be linked to a high risk of knee injury.

KW - female

KW - frontal plane motions

KW - male

KW - Running injury

KW - step width

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893141831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893141831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17461391.2012.693953

DO - 10.1080/17461391.2012.693953

M3 - Article

VL - 14

JO - European Journal of Sport Science

JF - European Journal of Sport Science

SN - 1746-1391

IS - SUPPL.1

ER -