Generalized search and cyclic derivation by phase

A preliminary study

Takaomi Kato, Masakazu Kuno, Hiroki Narita, Mihoko Zushi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Merge builds syntactic objects, but Merge alone cannot capture the syntactic relations established between syntactic objects. These relations include Agree(ment), chain-formation, and binding. In order to capture them in a unified manner, this chapter proposes that syntax is equipped with a general search mechanism, which we call Search. We characterize Search as an operation that establishes a relation between identical (complexes of) features. We also pose the question: what might the basic operations of syntax be? In the course of investigating this question, we scrutinize some of the putative operations in syntax, such as feature-valuation, feature-inheritance, and Transfer, and draw the conclusion that they are unnecessary and therefore should be eliminated. Our answer to the above question will thus be that Merge and Search are the only basic operations of syntax. The possibility that Search might be formally reduced to Merge is further suggested, in which case there would be only one fundamental operation of syntax, i.e., Merge, with an additional operation Search derived from it.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMerge in the Mind-Brain
Subtitle of host publicationEssays on Theoretical Linguistics and the Neuroscience of Language
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages75-93
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9781315442792
ISBN (Print)9781138216143
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

syntax
Syntax

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Kato, T., Kuno, M., Narita, H., & Zushi, M. (2017). Generalized search and cyclic derivation by phase: A preliminary study. In Merge in the Mind-Brain: Essays on Theoretical Linguistics and the Neuroscience of Language (pp. 75-93). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315442808

Generalized search and cyclic derivation by phase : A preliminary study. / Kato, Takaomi; Kuno, Masakazu; Narita, Hiroki; Zushi, Mihoko.

Merge in the Mind-Brain: Essays on Theoretical Linguistics and the Neuroscience of Language. Taylor and Francis, 2017. p. 75-93.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Kato, T, Kuno, M, Narita, H & Zushi, M 2017, Generalized search and cyclic derivation by phase: A preliminary study. in Merge in the Mind-Brain: Essays on Theoretical Linguistics and the Neuroscience of Language. Taylor and Francis, pp. 75-93. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315442808
Kato T, Kuno M, Narita H, Zushi M. Generalized search and cyclic derivation by phase: A preliminary study. In Merge in the Mind-Brain: Essays on Theoretical Linguistics and the Neuroscience of Language. Taylor and Francis. 2017. p. 75-93 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315442808
Kato, Takaomi ; Kuno, Masakazu ; Narita, Hiroki ; Zushi, Mihoko. / Generalized search and cyclic derivation by phase : A preliminary study. Merge in the Mind-Brain: Essays on Theoretical Linguistics and the Neuroscience of Language. Taylor and Francis, 2017. pp. 75-93
@inbook{81c80c46bd6a40e1956706092456f575,
title = "Generalized search and cyclic derivation by phase: A preliminary study",
abstract = "Merge builds syntactic objects, but Merge alone cannot capture the syntactic relations established between syntactic objects. These relations include Agree(ment), chain-formation, and binding. In order to capture them in a unified manner, this chapter proposes that syntax is equipped with a general search mechanism, which we call Search. We characterize Search as an operation that establishes a relation between identical (complexes of) features. We also pose the question: what might the basic operations of syntax be? In the course of investigating this question, we scrutinize some of the putative operations in syntax, such as feature-valuation, feature-inheritance, and Transfer, and draw the conclusion that they are unnecessary and therefore should be eliminated. Our answer to the above question will thus be that Merge and Search are the only basic operations of syntax. The possibility that Search might be formally reduced to Merge is further suggested, in which case there would be only one fundamental operation of syntax, i.e., Merge, with an additional operation Search derived from it.",
author = "Takaomi Kato and Masakazu Kuno and Hiroki Narita and Mihoko Zushi",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781315442808",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138216143",
pages = "75--93",
booktitle = "Merge in the Mind-Brain",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Generalized search and cyclic derivation by phase

T2 - A preliminary study

AU - Kato, Takaomi

AU - Kuno, Masakazu

AU - Narita, Hiroki

AU - Zushi, Mihoko

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Merge builds syntactic objects, but Merge alone cannot capture the syntactic relations established between syntactic objects. These relations include Agree(ment), chain-formation, and binding. In order to capture them in a unified manner, this chapter proposes that syntax is equipped with a general search mechanism, which we call Search. We characterize Search as an operation that establishes a relation between identical (complexes of) features. We also pose the question: what might the basic operations of syntax be? In the course of investigating this question, we scrutinize some of the putative operations in syntax, such as feature-valuation, feature-inheritance, and Transfer, and draw the conclusion that they are unnecessary and therefore should be eliminated. Our answer to the above question will thus be that Merge and Search are the only basic operations of syntax. The possibility that Search might be formally reduced to Merge is further suggested, in which case there would be only one fundamental operation of syntax, i.e., Merge, with an additional operation Search derived from it.

AB - Merge builds syntactic objects, but Merge alone cannot capture the syntactic relations established between syntactic objects. These relations include Agree(ment), chain-formation, and binding. In order to capture them in a unified manner, this chapter proposes that syntax is equipped with a general search mechanism, which we call Search. We characterize Search as an operation that establishes a relation between identical (complexes of) features. We also pose the question: what might the basic operations of syntax be? In the course of investigating this question, we scrutinize some of the putative operations in syntax, such as feature-valuation, feature-inheritance, and Transfer, and draw the conclusion that they are unnecessary and therefore should be eliminated. Our answer to the above question will thus be that Merge and Search are the only basic operations of syntax. The possibility that Search might be formally reduced to Merge is further suggested, in which case there would be only one fundamental operation of syntax, i.e., Merge, with an additional operation Search derived from it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021042339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021042339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315442808

DO - 10.4324/9781315442808

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138216143

SP - 75

EP - 93

BT - Merge in the Mind-Brain

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -