Geological, geochemical and social-scientific assessment of basaltic aquifers as potential storage sites for CO2

Yutaro Takaya, Kentaro Nakamura, Yasuhiro Kato

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Basaltic aquifers have the potential to provide secure option for CO 2 sequestration. Because basaltic rocks are widely distributed around the world, their capacity for storage of anthropogenic CO2 emissions is enormous. In addition, geochemical trapping of CO2 injected into basaltic aquifers occurs quickly, because basaltic rocks contain many cations that react with CO2 to form stable carbonate minerals. Two types of large-scale basaltic aquifers may be suitable for sequestering huge amounts of anthropogenic CO2: continental flood basalt aquifers and deep-sea basalt aquifers. Here, we assess the potential of these two CO2 sequestration options from geological, geochemical and social-scientific perspectives. From a geological and geochemical viewpoint, both continental flood basalt and deep-sea basalt aquifers have excellent CO2 storage potential. In deep-sea basalt aquifers, however, storage of injected CO 2 may be more secure than in continental flood basalt aquifers, because leakage of CO2 to the atmosphere is minimized by geological, geochemical and physical barriers associated with the deep-sea environment. In addition, from a social-scientific point of view, several current CO, injection projects in continental flood basalts have encountered problems due to groundwater depletion, and large-scale implementation of CO2 storage in continental flood basalt aquifers might cause contamination of freshwater resources needed for domestic and agricultural use. In striking contrast to continental flood basalts, deep-sea basalts can be used for CO2 storage without encountering critical problems, because deep-sea basalt aquifers have no economic value. We conclude, therefore, that deep-sea basalt aquifers arc a better option for CO2 storage than continental flood basalt aquifers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)385-396
Number of pages12
JournalGeochemical Journal
Volume47
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

aquifers
Aquifers
basalt
aquifer
flood basalt
deep sea
Carbon Monoxide
carbon sequestration
barriers (landforms)
Rocks
Carbonate minerals
rocks
ground water
rock
leakage
trapping
economics
Cations
Groundwater
carbonates

Keywords

  • Basaltic aquifer
  • CCS
  • Deep-sea basalt
  • Groundwater depletion
  • Water pollution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Geophysics

Cite this

Geological, geochemical and social-scientific assessment of basaltic aquifers as potential storage sites for CO2. / Takaya, Yutaro; Nakamura, Kentaro; Kato, Yasuhiro.

In: Geochemical Journal, Vol. 47, No. 4, 2013, p. 385-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8886133daf204a7aa01cb530d72c34b6,
title = "Geological, geochemical and social-scientific assessment of basaltic aquifers as potential storage sites for CO2",
abstract = "Basaltic aquifers have the potential to provide secure option for CO 2 sequestration. Because basaltic rocks are widely distributed around the world, their capacity for storage of anthropogenic CO2 emissions is enormous. In addition, geochemical trapping of CO2 injected into basaltic aquifers occurs quickly, because basaltic rocks contain many cations that react with CO2 to form stable carbonate minerals. Two types of large-scale basaltic aquifers may be suitable for sequestering huge amounts of anthropogenic CO2: continental flood basalt aquifers and deep-sea basalt aquifers. Here, we assess the potential of these two CO2 sequestration options from geological, geochemical and social-scientific perspectives. From a geological and geochemical viewpoint, both continental flood basalt and deep-sea basalt aquifers have excellent CO2 storage potential. In deep-sea basalt aquifers, however, storage of injected CO 2 may be more secure than in continental flood basalt aquifers, because leakage of CO2 to the atmosphere is minimized by geological, geochemical and physical barriers associated with the deep-sea environment. In addition, from a social-scientific point of view, several current CO, injection projects in continental flood basalts have encountered problems due to groundwater depletion, and large-scale implementation of CO2 storage in continental flood basalt aquifers might cause contamination of freshwater resources needed for domestic and agricultural use. In striking contrast to continental flood basalts, deep-sea basalts can be used for CO2 storage without encountering critical problems, because deep-sea basalt aquifers have no economic value. We conclude, therefore, that deep-sea basalt aquifers arc a better option for CO2 storage than continental flood basalt aquifers.",
keywords = "Basaltic aquifer, CCS, Deep-sea basalt, Groundwater depletion, Water pollution",
author = "Yutaro Takaya and Kentaro Nakamura and Yasuhiro Kato",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "385--396",
journal = "Geochemical Journal",
issn = "0016-7002",
publisher = "The Physiological Society of Japan",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geological, geochemical and social-scientific assessment of basaltic aquifers as potential storage sites for CO2

AU - Takaya, Yutaro

AU - Nakamura, Kentaro

AU - Kato, Yasuhiro

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Basaltic aquifers have the potential to provide secure option for CO 2 sequestration. Because basaltic rocks are widely distributed around the world, their capacity for storage of anthropogenic CO2 emissions is enormous. In addition, geochemical trapping of CO2 injected into basaltic aquifers occurs quickly, because basaltic rocks contain many cations that react with CO2 to form stable carbonate minerals. Two types of large-scale basaltic aquifers may be suitable for sequestering huge amounts of anthropogenic CO2: continental flood basalt aquifers and deep-sea basalt aquifers. Here, we assess the potential of these two CO2 sequestration options from geological, geochemical and social-scientific perspectives. From a geological and geochemical viewpoint, both continental flood basalt and deep-sea basalt aquifers have excellent CO2 storage potential. In deep-sea basalt aquifers, however, storage of injected CO 2 may be more secure than in continental flood basalt aquifers, because leakage of CO2 to the atmosphere is minimized by geological, geochemical and physical barriers associated with the deep-sea environment. In addition, from a social-scientific point of view, several current CO, injection projects in continental flood basalts have encountered problems due to groundwater depletion, and large-scale implementation of CO2 storage in continental flood basalt aquifers might cause contamination of freshwater resources needed for domestic and agricultural use. In striking contrast to continental flood basalts, deep-sea basalts can be used for CO2 storage without encountering critical problems, because deep-sea basalt aquifers have no economic value. We conclude, therefore, that deep-sea basalt aquifers arc a better option for CO2 storage than continental flood basalt aquifers.

AB - Basaltic aquifers have the potential to provide secure option for CO 2 sequestration. Because basaltic rocks are widely distributed around the world, their capacity for storage of anthropogenic CO2 emissions is enormous. In addition, geochemical trapping of CO2 injected into basaltic aquifers occurs quickly, because basaltic rocks contain many cations that react with CO2 to form stable carbonate minerals. Two types of large-scale basaltic aquifers may be suitable for sequestering huge amounts of anthropogenic CO2: continental flood basalt aquifers and deep-sea basalt aquifers. Here, we assess the potential of these two CO2 sequestration options from geological, geochemical and social-scientific perspectives. From a geological and geochemical viewpoint, both continental flood basalt and deep-sea basalt aquifers have excellent CO2 storage potential. In deep-sea basalt aquifers, however, storage of injected CO 2 may be more secure than in continental flood basalt aquifers, because leakage of CO2 to the atmosphere is minimized by geological, geochemical and physical barriers associated with the deep-sea environment. In addition, from a social-scientific point of view, several current CO, injection projects in continental flood basalts have encountered problems due to groundwater depletion, and large-scale implementation of CO2 storage in continental flood basalt aquifers might cause contamination of freshwater resources needed for domestic and agricultural use. In striking contrast to continental flood basalts, deep-sea basalts can be used for CO2 storage without encountering critical problems, because deep-sea basalt aquifers have no economic value. We conclude, therefore, that deep-sea basalt aquifers arc a better option for CO2 storage than continental flood basalt aquifers.

KW - Basaltic aquifer

KW - CCS

KW - Deep-sea basalt

KW - Groundwater depletion

KW - Water pollution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898745786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898745786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 385

EP - 396

JO - Geochemical Journal

JF - Geochemical Journal

SN - 0016-7002

IS - 4

ER -