Heisenberg and interaction representations in thermo field dynamics

T. S. Evans, I. Hardman, H. Umezawa, Yoshiya Yamanaka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper the so-called α degree of freedom appearing in thermal quantum field theory is discussed, using thermo field dynamics (TFD). This paper is confined to stationary thermal situations, both nonequilibrium and equilibrium. The main result is that when the stationary number distribution differs from the equilibrium one the use of time ordered and antitime ordered formalisms picks up α = 1 and α = 0, in contrast to the general belief that the Feynman diagram method is usable for any other a as well. This situation in TFD will be compared with the other approaches. The reason why the Feynman diagram method becomes available for any a in the case of the equilibrium distributions is also studied.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)370-378
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Mathematical Physics
Volume33
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Feynman Diagrams
Feynman diagrams
Equilibrium Distribution
Degrees of freedom (mechanics)
Quantum Field Theory
Interaction
Non-equilibrium
Degree of freedom
interactions
degrees of freedom
Hot Temperature
Beliefs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organic Chemistry

Cite this

Heisenberg and interaction representations in thermo field dynamics. / Evans, T. S.; Hardman, I.; Umezawa, H.; Yamanaka, Yoshiya.

In: Journal of Mathematical Physics, Vol. 33, No. 1, 1992, p. 370-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Evans, T. S. ; Hardman, I. ; Umezawa, H. ; Yamanaka, Yoshiya. / Heisenberg and interaction representations in thermo field dynamics. In: Journal of Mathematical Physics. 1992 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 370-378.
@article{9586b4292911475ab8129828eea4cd77,
title = "Heisenberg and interaction representations in thermo field dynamics",
abstract = "In this paper the so-called α degree of freedom appearing in thermal quantum field theory is discussed, using thermo field dynamics (TFD). This paper is confined to stationary thermal situations, both nonequilibrium and equilibrium. The main result is that when the stationary number distribution differs from the equilibrium one the use of time ordered and antitime ordered formalisms picks up α = 1 and α = 0, in contrast to the general belief that the Feynman diagram method is usable for any other a as well. This situation in TFD will be compared with the other approaches. The reason why the Feynman diagram method becomes available for any a in the case of the equilibrium distributions is also studied.",
author = "Evans, {T. S.} and I. Hardman and H. Umezawa and Yoshiya Yamanaka",
year = "1992",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "370--378",
journal = "Journal of Mathematical Physics",
issn = "0022-2488",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heisenberg and interaction representations in thermo field dynamics

AU - Evans, T. S.

AU - Hardman, I.

AU - Umezawa, H.

AU - Yamanaka, Yoshiya

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - In this paper the so-called α degree of freedom appearing in thermal quantum field theory is discussed, using thermo field dynamics (TFD). This paper is confined to stationary thermal situations, both nonequilibrium and equilibrium. The main result is that when the stationary number distribution differs from the equilibrium one the use of time ordered and antitime ordered formalisms picks up α = 1 and α = 0, in contrast to the general belief that the Feynman diagram method is usable for any other a as well. This situation in TFD will be compared with the other approaches. The reason why the Feynman diagram method becomes available for any a in the case of the equilibrium distributions is also studied.

AB - In this paper the so-called α degree of freedom appearing in thermal quantum field theory is discussed, using thermo field dynamics (TFD). This paper is confined to stationary thermal situations, both nonequilibrium and equilibrium. The main result is that when the stationary number distribution differs from the equilibrium one the use of time ordered and antitime ordered formalisms picks up α = 1 and α = 0, in contrast to the general belief that the Feynman diagram method is usable for any other a as well. This situation in TFD will be compared with the other approaches. The reason why the Feynman diagram method becomes available for any a in the case of the equilibrium distributions is also studied.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001503123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001503123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 370

EP - 378

JO - Journal of Mathematical Physics

JF - Journal of Mathematical Physics

SN - 0022-2488

IS - 1

ER -