TY - JOUR
T1 - Higher anticipated force required a stronger inhibitory process in go/nogo tasks
AU - Nakata, Hiroki
AU - Inui, Koji
AU - Wasaka, Toshiaki
AU - Tamura, Yohei
AU - Akatsuka, Kosuke
AU - Kida, Tetsuo
AU - Kakigi, Ryusuke
PY - 2006/8
Y1 - 2006/8
N2 - Objective: We investigated the effect of the inhibitory process with increasing muscle force on event-related potentials (ERPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Methods: The subjects performed a S1-S2 paradigm with go/nogo tasks. S1 was an auditory tone burst, and S2 was an electrical stimulation applied to the second (go stimuli) or fifth digit (nogo stimuli) of the left hand. The recordings were conducted at 3 force levels; 10, 30 and 50% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). After the presentation of S2, the subjects were instructed to adjust their force level to match the target line with a force trajectory line in only the go trials. Results: Nogo-N140 was significantly more negative in amplitude than go-N140 in all conditions, and became larger with increasing muscle force. The MEP, which was recorded at 150 ms after S2, became significantly smaller with increasing muscle force in nogo trials, whereas it became larger in go trials. Conclusions: Our results indicated that stronger inhibitory cerebral activity was needed for a nogo stimulus, in the case where a stronger response was needed for a go stimulus. Significance: The present study showed a significant relationship between cortical inhibitory process and muscle force.
AB - Objective: We investigated the effect of the inhibitory process with increasing muscle force on event-related potentials (ERPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Methods: The subjects performed a S1-S2 paradigm with go/nogo tasks. S1 was an auditory tone burst, and S2 was an electrical stimulation applied to the second (go stimuli) or fifth digit (nogo stimuli) of the left hand. The recordings were conducted at 3 force levels; 10, 30 and 50% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). After the presentation of S2, the subjects were instructed to adjust their force level to match the target line with a force trajectory line in only the go trials. Results: Nogo-N140 was significantly more negative in amplitude than go-N140 in all conditions, and became larger with increasing muscle force. The MEP, which was recorded at 150 ms after S2, became significantly smaller with increasing muscle force in nogo trials, whereas it became larger in go trials. Conclusions: Our results indicated that stronger inhibitory cerebral activity was needed for a nogo stimulus, in the case where a stronger response was needed for a go stimulus. Significance: The present study showed a significant relationship between cortical inhibitory process and muscle force.
KW - Event-related potentials
KW - N140
KW - Nogo potentials
KW - Response inhibition
KW - Somatosensory
KW - Transcranial magnetic stimulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746220249&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746220249&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.03.032
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.03.032
M3 - Article
C2 - 16798081
AN - SCOPUS:33746220249
SN - 1388-2457
VL - 117
SP - 1669
EP - 1676
JO - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Electromyography and Motor Control
JF - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Electromyography and Motor Control
IS - 8
ER -