Highly reliable transient stability solution method using energy function

Ryuuichi Ando, Shinichi Iwamoto

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Power system stability is usually determined by solving nonlinear differential equations numerically, for instance, by the Runge Kutta method. P.D. Aylett applied the energy function method to the power system stability problem. This paper discusses the Kakimoto method and PEBS method (Potential Energy Boundary method) proposed by T. Athay. It is pointed out that overly optimistic solutions are obtained due to the presence of second swing and decelerating step-out. This paper proposes a new method to determine the stability limit. Kakimoto's method gives an incorrect solution when the solution trajectory does not reach the critical energy curve and his method also fails to give the stability limit curve on the phase plane. A disadvantage of Athay's method is that the stability limit curve is approximated by PEBS method. The method proposed gives a clearly defined stability limit curve.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)57-66
    Number of pages10
    JournalElectrical Engineering in Japan (English translation of Denki Gakkai Ronbunshi)
    Volume108
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 1988 Jul

    Fingerprint

    System stability
    Runge Kutta methods
    Potential energy
    Differential equations
    Trajectories

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

    Cite this

    Highly reliable transient stability solution method using energy function. / Ando, Ryuuichi; Iwamoto, Shinichi.

    In: Electrical Engineering in Japan (English translation of Denki Gakkai Ronbunshi), Vol. 108, No. 4, 07.1988, p. 57-66.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{5e76a221ed764b8f9a284f8854c8ba8b,
    title = "Highly reliable transient stability solution method using energy function",
    abstract = "Power system stability is usually determined by solving nonlinear differential equations numerically, for instance, by the Runge Kutta method. P.D. Aylett applied the energy function method to the power system stability problem. This paper discusses the Kakimoto method and PEBS method (Potential Energy Boundary method) proposed by T. Athay. It is pointed out that overly optimistic solutions are obtained due to the presence of second swing and decelerating step-out. This paper proposes a new method to determine the stability limit. Kakimoto's method gives an incorrect solution when the solution trajectory does not reach the critical energy curve and his method also fails to give the stability limit curve on the phase plane. A disadvantage of Athay's method is that the stability limit curve is approximated by PEBS method. The method proposed gives a clearly defined stability limit curve.",
    author = "Ryuuichi Ando and Shinichi Iwamoto",
    year = "1988",
    month = "7",
    language = "English",
    volume = "108",
    pages = "57--66",
    journal = "Electrical Engineering in Japan (English translation of Denki Gakkai Ronbunshi)",
    issn = "0424-7760",
    publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Highly reliable transient stability solution method using energy function

    AU - Ando, Ryuuichi

    AU - Iwamoto, Shinichi

    PY - 1988/7

    Y1 - 1988/7

    N2 - Power system stability is usually determined by solving nonlinear differential equations numerically, for instance, by the Runge Kutta method. P.D. Aylett applied the energy function method to the power system stability problem. This paper discusses the Kakimoto method and PEBS method (Potential Energy Boundary method) proposed by T. Athay. It is pointed out that overly optimistic solutions are obtained due to the presence of second swing and decelerating step-out. This paper proposes a new method to determine the stability limit. Kakimoto's method gives an incorrect solution when the solution trajectory does not reach the critical energy curve and his method also fails to give the stability limit curve on the phase plane. A disadvantage of Athay's method is that the stability limit curve is approximated by PEBS method. The method proposed gives a clearly defined stability limit curve.

    AB - Power system stability is usually determined by solving nonlinear differential equations numerically, for instance, by the Runge Kutta method. P.D. Aylett applied the energy function method to the power system stability problem. This paper discusses the Kakimoto method and PEBS method (Potential Energy Boundary method) proposed by T. Athay. It is pointed out that overly optimistic solutions are obtained due to the presence of second swing and decelerating step-out. This paper proposes a new method to determine the stability limit. Kakimoto's method gives an incorrect solution when the solution trajectory does not reach the critical energy curve and his method also fails to give the stability limit curve on the phase plane. A disadvantage of Athay's method is that the stability limit curve is approximated by PEBS method. The method proposed gives a clearly defined stability limit curve.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024038324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024038324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    VL - 108

    SP - 57

    EP - 66

    JO - Electrical Engineering in Japan (English translation of Denki Gakkai Ronbunshi)

    JF - Electrical Engineering in Japan (English translation of Denki Gakkai Ronbunshi)

    SN - 0424-7760

    IS - 4

    ER -