TY - GEN
T1 - Hot-Get-Richer Network Growth Model
AU - Nsour, Faisal
AU - Sayama, Hiroki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Under preferential attachment (PA) network growth models late arrivals are at a disadvantage with regard to their final degrees. Previous extensions of PA have addressed this deficiency by either adding the notion of node fitness to PA, usually drawn from some fitness score distributions, or by using fitness alone to control attachment. Here we introduce a new dynamical approach to address late arrivals by adding a recent-degree-change bias to PA so that nodes with higher relative degree change in temporal proximity to an arriving node get an attachment probability boost. In other words, if PA describes a rich-get-richer mechanism, and fitness-based approaches describe good-get-richer mechanisms, then our model can be characterized as a hot-get-richer mechanism, where hotness is determined by the rate of degree change over some recent past. The proposed model produces much later high-ranking nodes than the PA model and, under certain parameters, produces networks with structure similar to PA networks.
AB - Under preferential attachment (PA) network growth models late arrivals are at a disadvantage with regard to their final degrees. Previous extensions of PA have addressed this deficiency by either adding the notion of node fitness to PA, usually drawn from some fitness score distributions, or by using fitness alone to control attachment. Here we introduce a new dynamical approach to address late arrivals by adding a recent-degree-change bias to PA so that nodes with higher relative degree change in temporal proximity to an arriving node get an attachment probability boost. In other words, if PA describes a rich-get-richer mechanism, and fitness-based approaches describe good-get-richer mechanisms, then our model can be characterized as a hot-get-richer mechanism, where hotness is determined by the rate of degree change over some recent past. The proposed model produces much later high-ranking nodes than the PA model and, under certain parameters, produces networks with structure similar to PA networks.
KW - Degree dynamics
KW - First-mover advantage
KW - Hot-get-richer
KW - Network growth
KW - Preferential attachment
KW - Winner-take-all
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101836481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101836481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-65351-4_43
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-65351-4_43
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85101836481
SN - 9783030653507
T3 - Studies in Computational Intelligence
SP - 532
EP - 543
BT - Complex Networks and Their Applications IX - Volume 2, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Complex Networks and Their Applications COMPLEX NETWORKS 2020
A2 - Benito, Rosa M.
A2 - Cherifi, Chantal
A2 - Cherifi, Hocine
A2 - Moro, Esteban
A2 - Rocha, Luis Mateus
A2 - Sales-Pardo, Marta
PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
T2 - 9th International Conference on Complex Networks and their Applications, COMPLEX NETWORKS 2020
Y2 - 1 December 2020 through 3 December 2020
ER -