How does local governance affect project outcomes? Experience from a Participatory Forestry (PF) project in Bangladesh

Tapan Kumar Nath, Makoto Inoue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

By sampling two contrasting villages of the Upland Settlement Project (USP), a PF project of Bangladesh, this research examines: • the present conditions of the USP in terms of progress towards achieving targeted objectives • issues of local-level governance that affect attaining those objectives. Findings indicate that the project authority could not adequately attain project objectives because of low level of participation, lack of accountability and transparency in handling project money, gaps in communication and information flow and the poor response of project staff. For better project outcomes, governance situation need to be improved through the formation of social capital.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)491-506
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology
Volume7
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Jan
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

governance
Bangladesh
forestry
information transparency
highlands
social capital
villages
project
accountability
transparency
sampling
village
communication

Keywords

  • Agroforestry
  • Governance
  • Livelihood
  • Participatory forestry
  • PF
  • Social capital

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{15b25c0ced1e43aa8cb2aa1689c08ad5,
title = "How does local governance affect project outcomes? Experience from a Participatory Forestry (PF) project in Bangladesh",
abstract = "By sampling two contrasting villages of the Upland Settlement Project (USP), a PF project of Bangladesh, this research examines: • the present conditions of the USP in terms of progress towards achieving targeted objectives • issues of local-level governance that affect attaining those objectives. Findings indicate that the project authority could not adequately attain project objectives because of low level of participation, lack of accountability and transparency in handling project money, gaps in communication and information flow and the poor response of project staff. For better project outcomes, governance situation need to be improved through the formation of social capital.",
keywords = "Agroforestry, Governance, Livelihood, Participatory forestry, PF, Social capital",
author = "Nath, {Tapan Kumar} and Makoto Inoue",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1504/IJARGE.2008.022749",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "491--506",
journal = "International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology",
issn = "1462-4605",
publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How does local governance affect project outcomes? Experience from a Participatory Forestry (PF) project in Bangladesh

AU - Nath, Tapan Kumar

AU - Inoue, Makoto

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - By sampling two contrasting villages of the Upland Settlement Project (USP), a PF project of Bangladesh, this research examines: • the present conditions of the USP in terms of progress towards achieving targeted objectives • issues of local-level governance that affect attaining those objectives. Findings indicate that the project authority could not adequately attain project objectives because of low level of participation, lack of accountability and transparency in handling project money, gaps in communication and information flow and the poor response of project staff. For better project outcomes, governance situation need to be improved through the formation of social capital.

AB - By sampling two contrasting villages of the Upland Settlement Project (USP), a PF project of Bangladesh, this research examines: • the present conditions of the USP in terms of progress towards achieving targeted objectives • issues of local-level governance that affect attaining those objectives. Findings indicate that the project authority could not adequately attain project objectives because of low level of participation, lack of accountability and transparency in handling project money, gaps in communication and information flow and the poor response of project staff. For better project outcomes, governance situation need to be improved through the formation of social capital.

KW - Agroforestry

KW - Governance

KW - Livelihood

KW - Participatory forestry

KW - PF

KW - Social capital

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58849099938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58849099938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1504/IJARGE.2008.022749

DO - 10.1504/IJARGE.2008.022749

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 491

EP - 506

JO - International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology

JF - International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology

SN - 1462-4605

IS - 6

ER -