How does the market value management practices of Japanese firms? Using management practice survey data

Atsushi Kawakami, Shigeru Asaba

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This paper examines the extent to which firm’s management practices are valued in the marketplace using the data of interview survey. First, we divide a firm’s market value into its tangible and intangible assets, and further decompose the intangible asset value into the components attributable to advertising, to R&D, and to management practices. We find that the component attributable to management practices is much smaller than the components attributable to R&D or to advertising. We also find that among various management practices, human resource management has a significantly positive impact on Tobin’s q. Some of organizational management variables, however, have significantly negative impacts on Tobin’s q, contrary to the findings of Bloom and Van Reenen (Quarterly Journal of Economics 122:1341-1408, 2007; Journal of Economic Perspectives 24:203-224, 2010) and Bloom et al. (Academy of Management Perspectives 26:12-33, 2012), to which we referred when we conducted interview survey. Then, we further explore the organizational management practice variables to understand why they do not have significantly positive impacts on Tobin’s q. The finer analysis finds that many characteristics of management practices, which are supposed to increase market value of the firms, actually have no significant impact or a negative impact on Tobin’s q. The results suggest that information sharing and coordination within a unit or a team increase the value, while disclosing information and coordinating across units decrease the value. The results also suggest that quick decision making has different impacts on firm’s market value depending upon the contexts. Speedy decision making increases the value in case of new business development, while consultation with the people concerned increases firm’s market value in case of closing the existing business. The different results of this study from the existing ones may suggest that good management practices are different among countries.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIntangibles, Market Failure and Innovation Performance
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages193-216
Number of pages24
ISBN (Print)9783319075334, 9783319075327
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Japanese firms
Value management
Market value
Survey data
Management practices
Tobin's Q
Decision making
Organizational management
Economics
Intangible assets
Information sharing
New business development
Human resource management practices
Asset value

Keywords

  • Decomposition
  • Intangible Assets
  • Management Practices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Kawakami, A., & Asaba, S. (2015). How does the market value management practices of Japanese firms? Using management practice survey data. In Intangibles, Market Failure and Innovation Performance (pp. 193-216). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07533-4_8

How does the market value management practices of Japanese firms? Using management practice survey data. / Kawakami, Atsushi; Asaba, Shigeru.

Intangibles, Market Failure and Innovation Performance. Springer International Publishing, 2015. p. 193-216.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Kawakami, A & Asaba, S 2015, How does the market value management practices of Japanese firms? Using management practice survey data. in Intangibles, Market Failure and Innovation Performance. Springer International Publishing, pp. 193-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07533-4_8
Kawakami A, Asaba S. How does the market value management practices of Japanese firms? Using management practice survey data. In Intangibles, Market Failure and Innovation Performance. Springer International Publishing. 2015. p. 193-216 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07533-4_8
Kawakami, Atsushi ; Asaba, Shigeru. / How does the market value management practices of Japanese firms? Using management practice survey data. Intangibles, Market Failure and Innovation Performance. Springer International Publishing, 2015. pp. 193-216
@inbook{69f73f8f902c41f9b077a69741734053,
title = "How does the market value management practices of Japanese firms? Using management practice survey data",
abstract = "This paper examines the extent to which firm’s management practices are valued in the marketplace using the data of interview survey. First, we divide a firm’s market value into its tangible and intangible assets, and further decompose the intangible asset value into the components attributable to advertising, to R&D, and to management practices. We find that the component attributable to management practices is much smaller than the components attributable to R&D or to advertising. We also find that among various management practices, human resource management has a significantly positive impact on Tobin’s q. Some of organizational management variables, however, have significantly negative impacts on Tobin’s q, contrary to the findings of Bloom and Van Reenen (Quarterly Journal of Economics 122:1341-1408, 2007; Journal of Economic Perspectives 24:203-224, 2010) and Bloom et al. (Academy of Management Perspectives 26:12-33, 2012), to which we referred when we conducted interview survey. Then, we further explore the organizational management practice variables to understand why they do not have significantly positive impacts on Tobin’s q. The finer analysis finds that many characteristics of management practices, which are supposed to increase market value of the firms, actually have no significant impact or a negative impact on Tobin’s q. The results suggest that information sharing and coordination within a unit or a team increase the value, while disclosing information and coordinating across units decrease the value. The results also suggest that quick decision making has different impacts on firm’s market value depending upon the contexts. Speedy decision making increases the value in case of new business development, while consultation with the people concerned increases firm’s market value in case of closing the existing business. The different results of this study from the existing ones may suggest that good management practices are different among countries.",
keywords = "Decomposition, Intangible Assets, Management Practices",
author = "Atsushi Kawakami and Shigeru Asaba",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-07533-4_8",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319075334",
pages = "193--216",
booktitle = "Intangibles, Market Failure and Innovation Performance",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - How does the market value management practices of Japanese firms? Using management practice survey data

AU - Kawakami, Atsushi

AU - Asaba, Shigeru

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - This paper examines the extent to which firm’s management practices are valued in the marketplace using the data of interview survey. First, we divide a firm’s market value into its tangible and intangible assets, and further decompose the intangible asset value into the components attributable to advertising, to R&D, and to management practices. We find that the component attributable to management practices is much smaller than the components attributable to R&D or to advertising. We also find that among various management practices, human resource management has a significantly positive impact on Tobin’s q. Some of organizational management variables, however, have significantly negative impacts on Tobin’s q, contrary to the findings of Bloom and Van Reenen (Quarterly Journal of Economics 122:1341-1408, 2007; Journal of Economic Perspectives 24:203-224, 2010) and Bloom et al. (Academy of Management Perspectives 26:12-33, 2012), to which we referred when we conducted interview survey. Then, we further explore the organizational management practice variables to understand why they do not have significantly positive impacts on Tobin’s q. The finer analysis finds that many characteristics of management practices, which are supposed to increase market value of the firms, actually have no significant impact or a negative impact on Tobin’s q. The results suggest that information sharing and coordination within a unit or a team increase the value, while disclosing information and coordinating across units decrease the value. The results also suggest that quick decision making has different impacts on firm’s market value depending upon the contexts. Speedy decision making increases the value in case of new business development, while consultation with the people concerned increases firm’s market value in case of closing the existing business. The different results of this study from the existing ones may suggest that good management practices are different among countries.

AB - This paper examines the extent to which firm’s management practices are valued in the marketplace using the data of interview survey. First, we divide a firm’s market value into its tangible and intangible assets, and further decompose the intangible asset value into the components attributable to advertising, to R&D, and to management practices. We find that the component attributable to management practices is much smaller than the components attributable to R&D or to advertising. We also find that among various management practices, human resource management has a significantly positive impact on Tobin’s q. Some of organizational management variables, however, have significantly negative impacts on Tobin’s q, contrary to the findings of Bloom and Van Reenen (Quarterly Journal of Economics 122:1341-1408, 2007; Journal of Economic Perspectives 24:203-224, 2010) and Bloom et al. (Academy of Management Perspectives 26:12-33, 2012), to which we referred when we conducted interview survey. Then, we further explore the organizational management practice variables to understand why they do not have significantly positive impacts on Tobin’s q. The finer analysis finds that many characteristics of management practices, which are supposed to increase market value of the firms, actually have no significant impact or a negative impact on Tobin’s q. The results suggest that information sharing and coordination within a unit or a team increase the value, while disclosing information and coordinating across units decrease the value. The results also suggest that quick decision making has different impacts on firm’s market value depending upon the contexts. Speedy decision making increases the value in case of new business development, while consultation with the people concerned increases firm’s market value in case of closing the existing business. The different results of this study from the existing ones may suggest that good management practices are different among countries.

KW - Decomposition

KW - Intangible Assets

KW - Management Practices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944615860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944615860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-07533-4_8

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-07533-4_8

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84944615860

SN - 9783319075334

SN - 9783319075327

SP - 193

EP - 216

BT - Intangibles, Market Failure and Innovation Performance

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -