How Effective are Investment Promotion Agencies? Evidence from China

Bin Ni, Yasuyuki Todo, Tomohiko Inui

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Using both firm-level and city-level data from the Chinese National Bureau of Statistics and unique information on investment promotion agencies (IPA) in China, the present paper evaluates whether IPA affect foreign direct investment (FDI) from the perspective of both intensive and extensive margins; that is, re-investment by incumbent foreign-owned firms and total new FDI inflows into the city, respectively. After controlling for potential determinants of FDI and correcting for biases due to endogeneity, we find that, in general, IPA do not necessarily increase FDI in either case. However, IPA are found to promote re-investment by large foreign-owned firms. The results imply difficulty in the dissemination of information about the business environment to foreign investors.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJapanese Economic Review
    DOIs
    Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2016

    Fingerprint

    China
    Foreign direct investment
    Incumbents
    Foreign investors
    Statistics
    Extensive margin
    Business environment
    Intensive margin
    Endogeneity
    Dissemination

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics

    Cite this

    How Effective are Investment Promotion Agencies? Evidence from China. / Ni, Bin; Todo, Yasuyuki; Inui, Tomohiko.

    In: Japanese Economic Review, 2016.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{7694e1f903a9460ba6b6b8f9c20ed552,
    title = "How Effective are Investment Promotion Agencies? Evidence from China",
    abstract = "Using both firm-level and city-level data from the Chinese National Bureau of Statistics and unique information on investment promotion agencies (IPA) in China, the present paper evaluates whether IPA affect foreign direct investment (FDI) from the perspective of both intensive and extensive margins; that is, re-investment by incumbent foreign-owned firms and total new FDI inflows into the city, respectively. After controlling for potential determinants of FDI and correcting for biases due to endogeneity, we find that, in general, IPA do not necessarily increase FDI in either case. However, IPA are found to promote re-investment by large foreign-owned firms. The results imply difficulty in the dissemination of information about the business environment to foreign investors.",
    author = "Bin Ni and Yasuyuki Todo and Tomohiko Inui",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1111/jere.12089",
    language = "English",
    journal = "Japanese Economic Review",
    issn = "1352-4739",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - How Effective are Investment Promotion Agencies? Evidence from China

    AU - Ni, Bin

    AU - Todo, Yasuyuki

    AU - Inui, Tomohiko

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - Using both firm-level and city-level data from the Chinese National Bureau of Statistics and unique information on investment promotion agencies (IPA) in China, the present paper evaluates whether IPA affect foreign direct investment (FDI) from the perspective of both intensive and extensive margins; that is, re-investment by incumbent foreign-owned firms and total new FDI inflows into the city, respectively. After controlling for potential determinants of FDI and correcting for biases due to endogeneity, we find that, in general, IPA do not necessarily increase FDI in either case. However, IPA are found to promote re-investment by large foreign-owned firms. The results imply difficulty in the dissemination of information about the business environment to foreign investors.

    AB - Using both firm-level and city-level data from the Chinese National Bureau of Statistics and unique information on investment promotion agencies (IPA) in China, the present paper evaluates whether IPA affect foreign direct investment (FDI) from the perspective of both intensive and extensive margins; that is, re-investment by incumbent foreign-owned firms and total new FDI inflows into the city, respectively. After controlling for potential determinants of FDI and correcting for biases due to endogeneity, we find that, in general, IPA do not necessarily increase FDI in either case. However, IPA are found to promote re-investment by large foreign-owned firms. The results imply difficulty in the dissemination of information about the business environment to foreign investors.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963621748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963621748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/jere.12089

    DO - 10.1111/jere.12089

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84963621748

    JO - Japanese Economic Review

    JF - Japanese Economic Review

    SN - 1352-4739

    ER -