How well does theory explain reality? - A case of Arrow's impossibility theorem

Yasumi Matsumoto

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    In this paper, we investigate how well Arrow's impossibility theorem, a typical no-existence proof, can explain real human decision-making. Since the conclusion of a no-existence proof is universal, it may also be useful to examine instances of illogical decision-making which are actually handled in reality if an Arrovian approach is seriously considered. Then, we try to modify the framework to reflect the actual decision-making situation as much as possible by allowing individuals to have their own sets of alternatives. Since individual sets of alternatives are varied in nature, Arrow's framework is not satisfied in general because a social ordering of all alternatives does not normally exist. Therefore, it may be concluded that Arrow's impossibility result holds not only in theory but also in reality. This conclusion may open up a way to manage an illogical social decision such as cyclical decision-making and strategic negotiation, among others which are popular and effective in actual decision-making.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)398-412
    Number of pages15
    JournalInternational Journal of Economics and Business Research
    Volume13
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    Arrow's impossibility theorem
    Decision making
    Impossibility

    Keywords

    • Arrow's impossibility theorem
    • Illogical social decision
    • Inclusive set of individual alternatives
    • No-existence proof

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
    • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

    Cite this

    How well does theory explain reality? - A case of Arrow's impossibility theorem. / Matsumoto, Yasumi.

    In: International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2017, p. 398-412.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{6610d32f92644a27a9448e9b776b3707,
    title = "How well does theory explain reality? - A case of Arrow's impossibility theorem",
    abstract = "In this paper, we investigate how well Arrow's impossibility theorem, a typical no-existence proof, can explain real human decision-making. Since the conclusion of a no-existence proof is universal, it may also be useful to examine instances of illogical decision-making which are actually handled in reality if an Arrovian approach is seriously considered. Then, we try to modify the framework to reflect the actual decision-making situation as much as possible by allowing individuals to have their own sets of alternatives. Since individual sets of alternatives are varied in nature, Arrow's framework is not satisfied in general because a social ordering of all alternatives does not normally exist. Therefore, it may be concluded that Arrow's impossibility result holds not only in theory but also in reality. This conclusion may open up a way to manage an illogical social decision such as cyclical decision-making and strategic negotiation, among others which are popular and effective in actual decision-making.",
    keywords = "Arrow's impossibility theorem, Illogical social decision, Inclusive set of individual alternatives, No-existence proof",
    author = "Yasumi Matsumoto",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1504/IJEBR.2017.084382",
    language = "English",
    volume = "13",
    pages = "398--412",
    journal = "International Journal of Economics and Business Research",
    issn = "1756-9850",
    publisher = "Inderscience Publishers",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - How well does theory explain reality? - A case of Arrow's impossibility theorem

    AU - Matsumoto, Yasumi

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - In this paper, we investigate how well Arrow's impossibility theorem, a typical no-existence proof, can explain real human decision-making. Since the conclusion of a no-existence proof is universal, it may also be useful to examine instances of illogical decision-making which are actually handled in reality if an Arrovian approach is seriously considered. Then, we try to modify the framework to reflect the actual decision-making situation as much as possible by allowing individuals to have their own sets of alternatives. Since individual sets of alternatives are varied in nature, Arrow's framework is not satisfied in general because a social ordering of all alternatives does not normally exist. Therefore, it may be concluded that Arrow's impossibility result holds not only in theory but also in reality. This conclusion may open up a way to manage an illogical social decision such as cyclical decision-making and strategic negotiation, among others which are popular and effective in actual decision-making.

    AB - In this paper, we investigate how well Arrow's impossibility theorem, a typical no-existence proof, can explain real human decision-making. Since the conclusion of a no-existence proof is universal, it may also be useful to examine instances of illogical decision-making which are actually handled in reality if an Arrovian approach is seriously considered. Then, we try to modify the framework to reflect the actual decision-making situation as much as possible by allowing individuals to have their own sets of alternatives. Since individual sets of alternatives are varied in nature, Arrow's framework is not satisfied in general because a social ordering of all alternatives does not normally exist. Therefore, it may be concluded that Arrow's impossibility result holds not only in theory but also in reality. This conclusion may open up a way to manage an illogical social decision such as cyclical decision-making and strategic negotiation, among others which are popular and effective in actual decision-making.

    KW - Arrow's impossibility theorem

    KW - Illogical social decision

    KW - Inclusive set of individual alternatives

    KW - No-existence proof

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020449535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020449535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1504/IJEBR.2017.084382

    DO - 10.1504/IJEBR.2017.084382

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85020449535

    VL - 13

    SP - 398

    EP - 412

    JO - International Journal of Economics and Business Research

    JF - International Journal of Economics and Business Research

    SN - 1756-9850

    IS - 4

    ER -