Ideological radicalism and democratic experience in new democracies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In comparing publics’ ideological self-placements between established and new democracies, it has been observed that there is a higher proportion of citizens who express radical views in the latter countries. This is likely due to sharp differences with regard to evaluations of past authoritarian rule, the legitimacy of the new regime, or new institutional arrangements governing the distribution of power when countries embark on democratic transition. Studies on the attitudinal aspect of democratic consolidation lead one to expect a decrease in extreme views in new democracies with the passage of time, as questions of regime principles and institutions are settled, and citizens come to accept democracy as the “only game in town”. The present article investigates whether this proposition is applicable to “Third Wave” new democracies in Eastern Europe, Latin America, and East Asia by examining longitudinal public opinion data from 23 countries. In addition to the length of democratic regimes, We also analyse the impact of economic performance, quality of governance, and electoral systems on the proportion of radical citizens. Results show that while longer democratic experience does contribute to reducing extremist leanings, factors such as the level of corruption, rule of law, and plurality electoral rules play a more substantive role.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)592-612
Number of pages21
JournalDemocratization
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jun 6
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

radicalism
democracy
democratic transition
regime
citizen
experience
electoral system
distribution of power
corruption
constitutional state
Eastern Europe
consolidation
public opinion
Latin America
legitimacy
town
governance
evaluation
economics
performance

Keywords

  • extremism
  • governance
  • ideology
  • new democracies
  • public opinion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Ideological radicalism and democratic experience in new democracies. / Jou, Willy.

In: Democratization, Vol. 23, No. 4, 06.06.2016, p. 592-612.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6551c952f3cc4924be27e716dfd531ed,
title = "Ideological radicalism and democratic experience in new democracies",
abstract = "In comparing publics’ ideological self-placements between established and new democracies, it has been observed that there is a higher proportion of citizens who express radical views in the latter countries. This is likely due to sharp differences with regard to evaluations of past authoritarian rule, the legitimacy of the new regime, or new institutional arrangements governing the distribution of power when countries embark on democratic transition. Studies on the attitudinal aspect of democratic consolidation lead one to expect a decrease in extreme views in new democracies with the passage of time, as questions of regime principles and institutions are settled, and citizens come to accept democracy as the “only game in town”. The present article investigates whether this proposition is applicable to “Third Wave” new democracies in Eastern Europe, Latin America, and East Asia by examining longitudinal public opinion data from 23 countries. In addition to the length of democratic regimes, We also analyse the impact of economic performance, quality of governance, and electoral systems on the proportion of radical citizens. Results show that while longer democratic experience does contribute to reducing extremist leanings, factors such as the level of corruption, rule of law, and plurality electoral rules play a more substantive role.",
keywords = "extremism, governance, ideology, new democracies, public opinion",
author = "Willy Jou",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1080/13510347.2014.993386",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "592--612",
journal = "Democratization",
issn = "1351-0347",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ideological radicalism and democratic experience in new democracies

AU - Jou, Willy

PY - 2016/6/6

Y1 - 2016/6/6

N2 - In comparing publics’ ideological self-placements between established and new democracies, it has been observed that there is a higher proportion of citizens who express radical views in the latter countries. This is likely due to sharp differences with regard to evaluations of past authoritarian rule, the legitimacy of the new regime, or new institutional arrangements governing the distribution of power when countries embark on democratic transition. Studies on the attitudinal aspect of democratic consolidation lead one to expect a decrease in extreme views in new democracies with the passage of time, as questions of regime principles and institutions are settled, and citizens come to accept democracy as the “only game in town”. The present article investigates whether this proposition is applicable to “Third Wave” new democracies in Eastern Europe, Latin America, and East Asia by examining longitudinal public opinion data from 23 countries. In addition to the length of democratic regimes, We also analyse the impact of economic performance, quality of governance, and electoral systems on the proportion of radical citizens. Results show that while longer democratic experience does contribute to reducing extremist leanings, factors such as the level of corruption, rule of law, and plurality electoral rules play a more substantive role.

AB - In comparing publics’ ideological self-placements between established and new democracies, it has been observed that there is a higher proportion of citizens who express radical views in the latter countries. This is likely due to sharp differences with regard to evaluations of past authoritarian rule, the legitimacy of the new regime, or new institutional arrangements governing the distribution of power when countries embark on democratic transition. Studies on the attitudinal aspect of democratic consolidation lead one to expect a decrease in extreme views in new democracies with the passage of time, as questions of regime principles and institutions are settled, and citizens come to accept democracy as the “only game in town”. The present article investigates whether this proposition is applicable to “Third Wave” new democracies in Eastern Europe, Latin America, and East Asia by examining longitudinal public opinion data from 23 countries. In addition to the length of democratic regimes, We also analyse the impact of economic performance, quality of governance, and electoral systems on the proportion of radical citizens. Results show that while longer democratic experience does contribute to reducing extremist leanings, factors such as the level of corruption, rule of law, and plurality electoral rules play a more substantive role.

KW - extremism

KW - governance

KW - ideology

KW - new democracies

KW - public opinion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923260772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923260772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13510347.2014.993386

DO - 10.1080/13510347.2014.993386

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84923260772

VL - 23

SP - 592

EP - 612

JO - Democratization

JF - Democratization

SN - 1351-0347

IS - 4

ER -