In Search of Optimum Institutions for Forest Management

Keijiro Otsuka, Ryo Takahashi, Ridish Pokharel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a variety of forest management institutions ranging from state management to community and private management. This article attempts to identify the conditions under which one institution outperforms the others in the efficiency of forest management based on a review of the literature, empirical evidence on the dominant forest management institutions, and theoretical arguments. In conclusion, we argue that the community management system performs best for nontimber forests, whereas a mixed management system, in which forest protection is carried out communally and tree management is carried out individually, is likely to work best for timber forests.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)300-314
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Sustainable Forestry
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Apr 3
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • community management
  • management incentives
  • mixed management
  • private management
  • protection cost
  • state management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Food Science
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Forestry
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'In Search of Optimum Institutions for Forest Management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this