Influence by the differences of methods and area ratios of speciments in formaldehyde resuction performance test for sorptive building materials

Hoon Kim, Shinichi Tanabe

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    There are increasing developments and uses of building materials which have sorptive and reduction ability for chemicals in indoor air, and test method for reduction performance of them has been required. For formaldehyde reduction performance test of those materials, JIS A 1905 was established Feb. 2007. Our group has developed the air flow control unit for 20L small chamber in order to evaluate reduction performance of sorptive building materials. JIS A 1905 describes the two methods [part.1:Measurement of adsorption flux with supplying constant concentration of formaldehyde (hereinafter, Constant Concentration Supplying Method (CCSM)) and part.2:Measurement of capability for suppressing formaldehyde emission (hereinafter, Emission Material Method (EMM))] for reduction performance test, but differences of test methods might provide different result values even if the same material was tested. In this paper, when changed area ratios (i.e. loading factor) of specimens under the same test method, it was investigated what differences would be made in performance values. As a result, when changed area ratios of specimens, (sorption flux( showed different values depending on area ratios but (equivalent ventilation rate( was less affected by area ratios. However, under the same area ratio condition, sorption fluxes showed even and steady values, while equivalent ventilation rates did fluctuating values depending on changes of chamber concentrations. When the same sorptive material tested, sorption fluxes gained from CCSM (JIS A 1905-1) showed 1.6 (for sorptive material DM) and 3.2 (for sorptive material TG) times higher values in compared with EMM (JIS A 1905-2). It was suggested that compensation of formaldehyde concentration with HBF equation could improve the performance value from EMM and reduce the disagreement between CCSM and EMM.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)35-41
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Environmental Engineering
    Volume76
    Issue number659
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Formaldehyde
    Fluxes
    Sorption
    Ventilation
    Air
    Flow control
    Adsorption

    Keywords

    • Area Ratio of Specimen
    • Formaldehyde
    • JIS A 1905
    • Reduction Performance
    • Small chamber
    • Sorptive building material

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Environmental Engineering

    Cite this

    @article{e3f5b61a56364a438c1316d59ff73c23,
    title = "Influence by the differences of methods and area ratios of speciments in formaldehyde resuction performance test for sorptive building materials",
    abstract = "There are increasing developments and uses of building materials which have sorptive and reduction ability for chemicals in indoor air, and test method for reduction performance of them has been required. For formaldehyde reduction performance test of those materials, JIS A 1905 was established Feb. 2007. Our group has developed the air flow control unit for 20L small chamber in order to evaluate reduction performance of sorptive building materials. JIS A 1905 describes the two methods [part.1:Measurement of adsorption flux with supplying constant concentration of formaldehyde (hereinafter, Constant Concentration Supplying Method (CCSM)) and part.2:Measurement of capability for suppressing formaldehyde emission (hereinafter, Emission Material Method (EMM))] for reduction performance test, but differences of test methods might provide different result values even if the same material was tested. In this paper, when changed area ratios (i.e. loading factor) of specimens under the same test method, it was investigated what differences would be made in performance values. As a result, when changed area ratios of specimens, (sorption flux( showed different values depending on area ratios but (equivalent ventilation rate( was less affected by area ratios. However, under the same area ratio condition, sorption fluxes showed even and steady values, while equivalent ventilation rates did fluctuating values depending on changes of chamber concentrations. When the same sorptive material tested, sorption fluxes gained from CCSM (JIS A 1905-1) showed 1.6 (for sorptive material DM) and 3.2 (for sorptive material TG) times higher values in compared with EMM (JIS A 1905-2). It was suggested that compensation of formaldehyde concentration with HBF equation could improve the performance value from EMM and reduce the disagreement between CCSM and EMM.",
    keywords = "Area Ratio of Specimen, Formaldehyde, JIS A 1905, Reduction Performance, Small chamber, Sorptive building material",
    author = "Hoon Kim and Shinichi Tanabe",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.3130/aije.76.35",
    language = "English",
    volume = "76",
    pages = "35--41",
    journal = "Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE",
    issn = "1348-0685",
    publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
    number = "659",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Influence by the differences of methods and area ratios of speciments in formaldehyde resuction performance test for sorptive building materials

    AU - Kim, Hoon

    AU - Tanabe, Shinichi

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - There are increasing developments and uses of building materials which have sorptive and reduction ability for chemicals in indoor air, and test method for reduction performance of them has been required. For formaldehyde reduction performance test of those materials, JIS A 1905 was established Feb. 2007. Our group has developed the air flow control unit for 20L small chamber in order to evaluate reduction performance of sorptive building materials. JIS A 1905 describes the two methods [part.1:Measurement of adsorption flux with supplying constant concentration of formaldehyde (hereinafter, Constant Concentration Supplying Method (CCSM)) and part.2:Measurement of capability for suppressing formaldehyde emission (hereinafter, Emission Material Method (EMM))] for reduction performance test, but differences of test methods might provide different result values even if the same material was tested. In this paper, when changed area ratios (i.e. loading factor) of specimens under the same test method, it was investigated what differences would be made in performance values. As a result, when changed area ratios of specimens, (sorption flux( showed different values depending on area ratios but (equivalent ventilation rate( was less affected by area ratios. However, under the same area ratio condition, sorption fluxes showed even and steady values, while equivalent ventilation rates did fluctuating values depending on changes of chamber concentrations. When the same sorptive material tested, sorption fluxes gained from CCSM (JIS A 1905-1) showed 1.6 (for sorptive material DM) and 3.2 (for sorptive material TG) times higher values in compared with EMM (JIS A 1905-2). It was suggested that compensation of formaldehyde concentration with HBF equation could improve the performance value from EMM and reduce the disagreement between CCSM and EMM.

    AB - There are increasing developments and uses of building materials which have sorptive and reduction ability for chemicals in indoor air, and test method for reduction performance of them has been required. For formaldehyde reduction performance test of those materials, JIS A 1905 was established Feb. 2007. Our group has developed the air flow control unit for 20L small chamber in order to evaluate reduction performance of sorptive building materials. JIS A 1905 describes the two methods [part.1:Measurement of adsorption flux with supplying constant concentration of formaldehyde (hereinafter, Constant Concentration Supplying Method (CCSM)) and part.2:Measurement of capability for suppressing formaldehyde emission (hereinafter, Emission Material Method (EMM))] for reduction performance test, but differences of test methods might provide different result values even if the same material was tested. In this paper, when changed area ratios (i.e. loading factor) of specimens under the same test method, it was investigated what differences would be made in performance values. As a result, when changed area ratios of specimens, (sorption flux( showed different values depending on area ratios but (equivalent ventilation rate( was less affected by area ratios. However, under the same area ratio condition, sorption fluxes showed even and steady values, while equivalent ventilation rates did fluctuating values depending on changes of chamber concentrations. When the same sorptive material tested, sorption fluxes gained from CCSM (JIS A 1905-1) showed 1.6 (for sorptive material DM) and 3.2 (for sorptive material TG) times higher values in compared with EMM (JIS A 1905-2). It was suggested that compensation of formaldehyde concentration with HBF equation could improve the performance value from EMM and reduce the disagreement between CCSM and EMM.

    KW - Area Ratio of Specimen

    KW - Formaldehyde

    KW - JIS A 1905

    KW - Reduction Performance

    KW - Small chamber

    KW - Sorptive building material

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863159524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863159524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.3130/aije.76.35

    DO - 10.3130/aije.76.35

    M3 - Article

    VL - 76

    SP - 35

    EP - 41

    JO - Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE

    JF - Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE

    SN - 1348-0685

    IS - 659

    ER -