Influence of sorption area ratio and test method on formaldehyde reduction performance for sorptive building materials

Hoon Kim, Shinichi Tanabe

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Sorptive materials can be used to improve the air quality by adsorbing harmful chemicals and other pollutants in indoor air. This study aims to (1) investigate the differences in the reduction performance values with changes in surface area ratios of sorptive materials for the two test methods (constant concentration supplying method and emission material method, hereinafter CCSM and EMM); (2) discuss whether the sorption flux "Fs" and equivalent ventilation rate "Qeq", which are two ways of representing the results, can accurately represent the reduction performance; and (3) suggest a method for compensating for disparities between the two test methods. Under the standard sorption area condition, CCSM yielded Fs with higher performance than EMM. The evaluation using Fs gave more advantage to a smaller sorption area condition, and CCSM was less influenced by the area than EMM. Changes in the area ratios resulted in changes in F s, but Qeq was less affected. However, for an identical area ratio condition, Fs resulted in steady values, while Q eq fluctuated owing to subtle changes in chamber concentrations. Compensation using the HBF (Hoetjer-Berge-Fujii) equation could improve EMM performance value and thus reduce the disparity between the two methods.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)175-182
    Number of pages8
    JournalConstruction and Building Materials
    Volume70
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014 Nov 15

    Fingerprint

    Formaldehyde
    Sorption
    Air quality
    Ventilation
    Fluxes
    Air

    Keywords

    • Area ratio
    • Chamber test
    • Formaldehyde
    • Indoor air quality
    • Reduction performance
    • Sorptive building material

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Civil and Structural Engineering
    • Building and Construction
    • Materials Science(all)

    Cite this

    @article{55a7681173f34c3e9db86431f80b5ed4,
    title = "Influence of sorption area ratio and test method on formaldehyde reduction performance for sorptive building materials",
    abstract = "Sorptive materials can be used to improve the air quality by adsorbing harmful chemicals and other pollutants in indoor air. This study aims to (1) investigate the differences in the reduction performance values with changes in surface area ratios of sorptive materials for the two test methods (constant concentration supplying method and emission material method, hereinafter CCSM and EMM); (2) discuss whether the sorption flux {"}Fs{"} and equivalent ventilation rate {"}Qeq{"}, which are two ways of representing the results, can accurately represent the reduction performance; and (3) suggest a method for compensating for disparities between the two test methods. Under the standard sorption area condition, CCSM yielded Fs with higher performance than EMM. The evaluation using Fs gave more advantage to a smaller sorption area condition, and CCSM was less influenced by the area than EMM. Changes in the area ratios resulted in changes in F s, but Qeq was less affected. However, for an identical area ratio condition, Fs resulted in steady values, while Q eq fluctuated owing to subtle changes in chamber concentrations. Compensation using the HBF (Hoetjer-Berge-Fujii) equation could improve EMM performance value and thus reduce the disparity between the two methods.",
    keywords = "Area ratio, Chamber test, Formaldehyde, Indoor air quality, Reduction performance, Sorptive building material",
    author = "Hoon Kim and Shinichi Tanabe",
    year = "2014",
    month = "11",
    day = "15",
    doi = "10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.110",
    language = "English",
    volume = "70",
    pages = "175--182",
    journal = "Construction and Building Materials",
    issn = "0950-0618",
    publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Influence of sorption area ratio and test method on formaldehyde reduction performance for sorptive building materials

    AU - Kim, Hoon

    AU - Tanabe, Shinichi

    PY - 2014/11/15

    Y1 - 2014/11/15

    N2 - Sorptive materials can be used to improve the air quality by adsorbing harmful chemicals and other pollutants in indoor air. This study aims to (1) investigate the differences in the reduction performance values with changes in surface area ratios of sorptive materials for the two test methods (constant concentration supplying method and emission material method, hereinafter CCSM and EMM); (2) discuss whether the sorption flux "Fs" and equivalent ventilation rate "Qeq", which are two ways of representing the results, can accurately represent the reduction performance; and (3) suggest a method for compensating for disparities between the two test methods. Under the standard sorption area condition, CCSM yielded Fs with higher performance than EMM. The evaluation using Fs gave more advantage to a smaller sorption area condition, and CCSM was less influenced by the area than EMM. Changes in the area ratios resulted in changes in F s, but Qeq was less affected. However, for an identical area ratio condition, Fs resulted in steady values, while Q eq fluctuated owing to subtle changes in chamber concentrations. Compensation using the HBF (Hoetjer-Berge-Fujii) equation could improve EMM performance value and thus reduce the disparity between the two methods.

    AB - Sorptive materials can be used to improve the air quality by adsorbing harmful chemicals and other pollutants in indoor air. This study aims to (1) investigate the differences in the reduction performance values with changes in surface area ratios of sorptive materials for the two test methods (constant concentration supplying method and emission material method, hereinafter CCSM and EMM); (2) discuss whether the sorption flux "Fs" and equivalent ventilation rate "Qeq", which are two ways of representing the results, can accurately represent the reduction performance; and (3) suggest a method for compensating for disparities between the two test methods. Under the standard sorption area condition, CCSM yielded Fs with higher performance than EMM. The evaluation using Fs gave more advantage to a smaller sorption area condition, and CCSM was less influenced by the area than EMM. Changes in the area ratios resulted in changes in F s, but Qeq was less affected. However, for an identical area ratio condition, Fs resulted in steady values, while Q eq fluctuated owing to subtle changes in chamber concentrations. Compensation using the HBF (Hoetjer-Berge-Fujii) equation could improve EMM performance value and thus reduce the disparity between the two methods.

    KW - Area ratio

    KW - Chamber test

    KW - Formaldehyde

    KW - Indoor air quality

    KW - Reduction performance

    KW - Sorptive building material

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906544721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906544721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.110

    DO - 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.110

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84906544721

    VL - 70

    SP - 175

    EP - 182

    JO - Construction and Building Materials

    JF - Construction and Building Materials

    SN - 0950-0618

    ER -