Integrated methods for a user adapted usability evaluation

Junko Shirogane, Yuichiro Yashita, Hajime Iwata, Yoshiaki Fukazawa

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    For software development, methods must be able to effectively perform evaluations with respect to financial and time considerations. Usability evaluations are commonly performed to ensure software is usable. Most evaluations are individually performed, leading to some significant disadvantages. Although individual evaluations identify many usability problems, efficient modifications in terms of cost and development time are difficult. Additionally, usability problems in only specific perspectives are identified in individual usability evaluations. It is important to identify comprehensively usability problems in various perspectives. To improve these situations, the authors have proposed a method to automatically integrate various types of usability evaluations. Their method adds functions to record the operation histories of the target software. This information is then used to perform individual usability evaluations with an emphasis on usability categories, such as efficiency, errors, and learnability. Then the method integrates these individual evaluations to identify usability problems and subsequently prioritize these problems according to usability categories determined by the software developers and end users. Specifically, the authors' research focuses on employing automatic usability evaluations to identify problems. For example, they analyze the operation histories, but do not focus on manually performed evaluations such as heuristic ones. They assume their research can aid software developers and usability engineers because their work allows them to recognize the more serious problems. Consequently, the software can be modified to resolve the usability problems and better meet the end users' requirements. In the future, the authors strive to integrate more diverse usability evaluations, including heuristic evaluations, to refine integration capabilities, to identify problems in more detail, and to improve the effectiveness of the usability evaluations.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationInformation Systems Research and Exploring Social Artifacts: Approaches and Methodologies
    PublisherIGI Global
    Pages379-397
    Number of pages19
    ISBN (Print)9781466624917
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Software engineering
    Engineers
    Costs

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Computer Science(all)

    Cite this

    Shirogane, J., Yashita, Y., Iwata, H., & Fukazawa, Y. (2012). Integrated methods for a user adapted usability evaluation. In Information Systems Research and Exploring Social Artifacts: Approaches and Methodologies (pp. 379-397). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2491-7.ch019

    Integrated methods for a user adapted usability evaluation. / Shirogane, Junko; Yashita, Yuichiro; Iwata, Hajime; Fukazawa, Yoshiaki.

    Information Systems Research and Exploring Social Artifacts: Approaches and Methodologies. IGI Global, 2012. p. 379-397.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Shirogane, J, Yashita, Y, Iwata, H & Fukazawa, Y 2012, Integrated methods for a user adapted usability evaluation. in Information Systems Research and Exploring Social Artifacts: Approaches and Methodologies. IGI Global, pp. 379-397. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2491-7.ch019
    Shirogane J, Yashita Y, Iwata H, Fukazawa Y. Integrated methods for a user adapted usability evaluation. In Information Systems Research and Exploring Social Artifacts: Approaches and Methodologies. IGI Global. 2012. p. 379-397 https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2491-7.ch019
    Shirogane, Junko ; Yashita, Yuichiro ; Iwata, Hajime ; Fukazawa, Yoshiaki. / Integrated methods for a user adapted usability evaluation. Information Systems Research and Exploring Social Artifacts: Approaches and Methodologies. IGI Global, 2012. pp. 379-397
    @inbook{2e5947dfcb6c45c9a56da34c1b41f0d5,
    title = "Integrated methods for a user adapted usability evaluation",
    abstract = "For software development, methods must be able to effectively perform evaluations with respect to financial and time considerations. Usability evaluations are commonly performed to ensure software is usable. Most evaluations are individually performed, leading to some significant disadvantages. Although individual evaluations identify many usability problems, efficient modifications in terms of cost and development time are difficult. Additionally, usability problems in only specific perspectives are identified in individual usability evaluations. It is important to identify comprehensively usability problems in various perspectives. To improve these situations, the authors have proposed a method to automatically integrate various types of usability evaluations. Their method adds functions to record the operation histories of the target software. This information is then used to perform individual usability evaluations with an emphasis on usability categories, such as efficiency, errors, and learnability. Then the method integrates these individual evaluations to identify usability problems and subsequently prioritize these problems according to usability categories determined by the software developers and end users. Specifically, the authors' research focuses on employing automatic usability evaluations to identify problems. For example, they analyze the operation histories, but do not focus on manually performed evaluations such as heuristic ones. They assume their research can aid software developers and usability engineers because their work allows them to recognize the more serious problems. Consequently, the software can be modified to resolve the usability problems and better meet the end users' requirements. In the future, the authors strive to integrate more diverse usability evaluations, including heuristic evaluations, to refine integration capabilities, to identify problems in more detail, and to improve the effectiveness of the usability evaluations.",
    author = "Junko Shirogane and Yuichiro Yashita and Hajime Iwata and Yoshiaki Fukazawa",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.4018/978-1-4666-2491-7.ch019",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9781466624917",
    pages = "379--397",
    booktitle = "Information Systems Research and Exploring Social Artifacts: Approaches and Methodologies",
    publisher = "IGI Global",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Integrated methods for a user adapted usability evaluation

    AU - Shirogane, Junko

    AU - Yashita, Yuichiro

    AU - Iwata, Hajime

    AU - Fukazawa, Yoshiaki

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - For software development, methods must be able to effectively perform evaluations with respect to financial and time considerations. Usability evaluations are commonly performed to ensure software is usable. Most evaluations are individually performed, leading to some significant disadvantages. Although individual evaluations identify many usability problems, efficient modifications in terms of cost and development time are difficult. Additionally, usability problems in only specific perspectives are identified in individual usability evaluations. It is important to identify comprehensively usability problems in various perspectives. To improve these situations, the authors have proposed a method to automatically integrate various types of usability evaluations. Their method adds functions to record the operation histories of the target software. This information is then used to perform individual usability evaluations with an emphasis on usability categories, such as efficiency, errors, and learnability. Then the method integrates these individual evaluations to identify usability problems and subsequently prioritize these problems according to usability categories determined by the software developers and end users. Specifically, the authors' research focuses on employing automatic usability evaluations to identify problems. For example, they analyze the operation histories, but do not focus on manually performed evaluations such as heuristic ones. They assume their research can aid software developers and usability engineers because their work allows them to recognize the more serious problems. Consequently, the software can be modified to resolve the usability problems and better meet the end users' requirements. In the future, the authors strive to integrate more diverse usability evaluations, including heuristic evaluations, to refine integration capabilities, to identify problems in more detail, and to improve the effectiveness of the usability evaluations.

    AB - For software development, methods must be able to effectively perform evaluations with respect to financial and time considerations. Usability evaluations are commonly performed to ensure software is usable. Most evaluations are individually performed, leading to some significant disadvantages. Although individual evaluations identify many usability problems, efficient modifications in terms of cost and development time are difficult. Additionally, usability problems in only specific perspectives are identified in individual usability evaluations. It is important to identify comprehensively usability problems in various perspectives. To improve these situations, the authors have proposed a method to automatically integrate various types of usability evaluations. Their method adds functions to record the operation histories of the target software. This information is then used to perform individual usability evaluations with an emphasis on usability categories, such as efficiency, errors, and learnability. Then the method integrates these individual evaluations to identify usability problems and subsequently prioritize these problems according to usability categories determined by the software developers and end users. Specifically, the authors' research focuses on employing automatic usability evaluations to identify problems. For example, they analyze the operation histories, but do not focus on manually performed evaluations such as heuristic ones. They assume their research can aid software developers and usability engineers because their work allows them to recognize the more serious problems. Consequently, the software can be modified to resolve the usability problems and better meet the end users' requirements. In the future, the authors strive to integrate more diverse usability evaluations, including heuristic evaluations, to refine integration capabilities, to identify problems in more detail, and to improve the effectiveness of the usability evaluations.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898238182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898238182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.4018/978-1-4666-2491-7.ch019

    DO - 10.4018/978-1-4666-2491-7.ch019

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 9781466624917

    SP - 379

    EP - 397

    BT - Information Systems Research and Exploring Social Artifacts: Approaches and Methodologies

    PB - IGI Global

    ER -