Intermittent visual feedback can boost motor learning of rhythmic movements: Evidence for error feedback beyond cycles

Tsuyoshi Ikegami, Masaya Hirashima, Rieko Osu, Daichi Nozaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Movement error is a driving force behind motor learning. For motor learning with discrete movements, such as point-to-point reaching, it is believed that the brain uses error information of the immediately preceding movement only. However, in the case of continuous and repetitive movements (i.e., rhythmic movements), there is a ceaseless inflow of performance information. Thus, an accurate temporal association of the motor commands with the resultant movement errors is not necessarily guaranteed. We investigated how the brain overcomes this challenging situation. Human participants adapted rhythmic movements between two targets to visuomotor rotations, the amplitudes of which changed randomly from cycle to cycle (the duration of one cycle was ~ 400 ms).Asystem identification technique revealed that the motor adaptation was affected not just by the preceding movement error, but also by a history of errors from the previous cycles. Error information obtained from more than one previous cycle tended to increase, rather than decrease, movement error. This result led to a counterintuitive prediction: providing visual error feedback for only a fraction of cycles should enhance visuomotor adaptation. As predicted, we observed that motor adaptation to a constant visual rotation (30°) was significantly enhanced by providing visual feedback once every fourth or fifth cycle rather than for every cycle. These results suggest that the brain requires a specific processing time to modify the motor command, based on the error information, and so is unable to deal appropriately with the overwhelming flow of error information generated during rhythmic movements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)653-657
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jan 11
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sensory Feedback
Learning
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Intermittent visual feedback can boost motor learning of rhythmic movements : Evidence for error feedback beyond cycles. / Ikegami, Tsuyoshi; Hirashima, Masaya; Osu, Rieko; Nozaki, Daichi.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 32, No. 2, 11.01.2012, p. 653-657.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{db45fa161ce84771868ff022a9ef4e80,
title = "Intermittent visual feedback can boost motor learning of rhythmic movements: Evidence for error feedback beyond cycles",
abstract = "Movement error is a driving force behind motor learning. For motor learning with discrete movements, such as point-to-point reaching, it is believed that the brain uses error information of the immediately preceding movement only. However, in the case of continuous and repetitive movements (i.e., rhythmic movements), there is a ceaseless inflow of performance information. Thus, an accurate temporal association of the motor commands with the resultant movement errors is not necessarily guaranteed. We investigated how the brain overcomes this challenging situation. Human participants adapted rhythmic movements between two targets to visuomotor rotations, the amplitudes of which changed randomly from cycle to cycle (the duration of one cycle was ~ 400 ms).Asystem identification technique revealed that the motor adaptation was affected not just by the preceding movement error, but also by a history of errors from the previous cycles. Error information obtained from more than one previous cycle tended to increase, rather than decrease, movement error. This result led to a counterintuitive prediction: providing visual error feedback for only a fraction of cycles should enhance visuomotor adaptation. As predicted, we observed that motor adaptation to a constant visual rotation (30°) was significantly enhanced by providing visual feedback once every fourth or fifth cycle rather than for every cycle. These results suggest that the brain requires a specific processing time to modify the motor command, based on the error information, and so is unable to deal appropriately with the overwhelming flow of error information generated during rhythmic movements.",
author = "Tsuyoshi Ikegami and Masaya Hirashima and Rieko Osu and Daichi Nozaki",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4230-11.2012",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "653--657",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intermittent visual feedback can boost motor learning of rhythmic movements

T2 - Evidence for error feedback beyond cycles

AU - Ikegami, Tsuyoshi

AU - Hirashima, Masaya

AU - Osu, Rieko

AU - Nozaki, Daichi

PY - 2012/1/11

Y1 - 2012/1/11

N2 - Movement error is a driving force behind motor learning. For motor learning with discrete movements, such as point-to-point reaching, it is believed that the brain uses error information of the immediately preceding movement only. However, in the case of continuous and repetitive movements (i.e., rhythmic movements), there is a ceaseless inflow of performance information. Thus, an accurate temporal association of the motor commands with the resultant movement errors is not necessarily guaranteed. We investigated how the brain overcomes this challenging situation. Human participants adapted rhythmic movements between two targets to visuomotor rotations, the amplitudes of which changed randomly from cycle to cycle (the duration of one cycle was ~ 400 ms).Asystem identification technique revealed that the motor adaptation was affected not just by the preceding movement error, but also by a history of errors from the previous cycles. Error information obtained from more than one previous cycle tended to increase, rather than decrease, movement error. This result led to a counterintuitive prediction: providing visual error feedback for only a fraction of cycles should enhance visuomotor adaptation. As predicted, we observed that motor adaptation to a constant visual rotation (30°) was significantly enhanced by providing visual feedback once every fourth or fifth cycle rather than for every cycle. These results suggest that the brain requires a specific processing time to modify the motor command, based on the error information, and so is unable to deal appropriately with the overwhelming flow of error information generated during rhythmic movements.

AB - Movement error is a driving force behind motor learning. For motor learning with discrete movements, such as point-to-point reaching, it is believed that the brain uses error information of the immediately preceding movement only. However, in the case of continuous and repetitive movements (i.e., rhythmic movements), there is a ceaseless inflow of performance information. Thus, an accurate temporal association of the motor commands with the resultant movement errors is not necessarily guaranteed. We investigated how the brain overcomes this challenging situation. Human participants adapted rhythmic movements between two targets to visuomotor rotations, the amplitudes of which changed randomly from cycle to cycle (the duration of one cycle was ~ 400 ms).Asystem identification technique revealed that the motor adaptation was affected not just by the preceding movement error, but also by a history of errors from the previous cycles. Error information obtained from more than one previous cycle tended to increase, rather than decrease, movement error. This result led to a counterintuitive prediction: providing visual error feedback for only a fraction of cycles should enhance visuomotor adaptation. As predicted, we observed that motor adaptation to a constant visual rotation (30°) was significantly enhanced by providing visual feedback once every fourth or fifth cycle rather than for every cycle. These results suggest that the brain requires a specific processing time to modify the motor command, based on the error information, and so is unable to deal appropriately with the overwhelming flow of error information generated during rhythmic movements.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855658132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855658132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4230-11.2012

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4230-11.2012

M3 - Article

C2 - 22238101

AN - SCOPUS:84855658132

VL - 32

SP - 653

EP - 657

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 2

ER -