Abstract
The study of interest groups is still a relatively small field of political science. The process of globalization has brought about the evolution of interest networks from national organizations to regional and transnational networks. This article uses the modes of political participation framework created by Jayasuriya and Rodan, in order to study the created spaces used by public interest networks at an interregional level. The empirical case study relates to Asia-Europe Meeting: the Europe-Asian interregional institution, and the work of public interest networks stemming from the civil society organizations that shadow it in opposing the EU–Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) free trade agreement (FTA). We find that the ‘modes of political participation’ model explains quite accurately the political spaces created by civil society in the EU–ASEAN FTA. We extend the framework by adding a fifth space, lobbying, which appears out of isomorphism. This concept represents the adoption by organizations of practices carried by other institutions they interact with. In this case, public interest networks have adopted the practice of directly influencing policy-makers that was the prerogative of private interest groups.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 563-577 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Globalizations |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2017 Jun 7 |
Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- civil society
- East Asia
- Europe
- interregionalism
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Administration
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Cite this
Interregionalism in Transnational Interest Networks : Euro-Asian Civil Society and the EU–ASEAN Free Trade Agreement. / Minambres Garcia, Ignacio Jose.
In: Globalizations, Vol. 14, No. 4, 07.06.2017, p. 563-577.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Interregionalism in Transnational Interest Networks
T2 - Euro-Asian Civil Society and the EU–ASEAN Free Trade Agreement
AU - Minambres Garcia, Ignacio Jose
PY - 2017/6/7
Y1 - 2017/6/7
N2 - The study of interest groups is still a relatively small field of political science. The process of globalization has brought about the evolution of interest networks from national organizations to regional and transnational networks. This article uses the modes of political participation framework created by Jayasuriya and Rodan, in order to study the created spaces used by public interest networks at an interregional level. The empirical case study relates to Asia-Europe Meeting: the Europe-Asian interregional institution, and the work of public interest networks stemming from the civil society organizations that shadow it in opposing the EU–Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) free trade agreement (FTA). We find that the ‘modes of political participation’ model explains quite accurately the political spaces created by civil society in the EU–ASEAN FTA. We extend the framework by adding a fifth space, lobbying, which appears out of isomorphism. This concept represents the adoption by organizations of practices carried by other institutions they interact with. In this case, public interest networks have adopted the practice of directly influencing policy-makers that was the prerogative of private interest groups.
AB - The study of interest groups is still a relatively small field of political science. The process of globalization has brought about the evolution of interest networks from national organizations to regional and transnational networks. This article uses the modes of political participation framework created by Jayasuriya and Rodan, in order to study the created spaces used by public interest networks at an interregional level. The empirical case study relates to Asia-Europe Meeting: the Europe-Asian interregional institution, and the work of public interest networks stemming from the civil society organizations that shadow it in opposing the EU–Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) free trade agreement (FTA). We find that the ‘modes of political participation’ model explains quite accurately the political spaces created by civil society in the EU–ASEAN FTA. We extend the framework by adding a fifth space, lobbying, which appears out of isomorphism. This concept represents the adoption by organizations of practices carried by other institutions they interact with. In this case, public interest networks have adopted the practice of directly influencing policy-makers that was the prerogative of private interest groups.
KW - civil society
KW - East Asia
KW - Europe
KW - interregionalism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988317016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988317016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14747731.2016.1223959
DO - 10.1080/14747731.2016.1223959
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84988317016
VL - 14
SP - 563
EP - 577
JO - Globalizations
JF - Globalizations
SN - 1474-7731
IS - 4
ER -