Interregionalism in Transnational Interest Networks

Euro-Asian Civil Society and the EU–ASEAN Free Trade Agreement

Ignacio Jose Minambres Garcia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The study of interest groups is still a relatively small field of political science. The process of globalization has brought about the evolution of interest networks from national organizations to regional and transnational networks. This article uses the modes of political participation framework created by Jayasuriya and Rodan, in order to study the created spaces used by public interest networks at an interregional level. The empirical case study relates to Asia-Europe Meeting: the Europe-Asian interregional institution, and the work of public interest networks stemming from the civil society organizations that shadow it in opposing the EU–Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) free trade agreement (FTA). We find that the ‘modes of political participation’ model explains quite accurately the political spaces created by civil society in the EU–ASEAN FTA. We extend the framework by adding a fifth space, lobbying, which appears out of isomorphism. This concept represents the adoption by organizations of practices carried by other institutions they interact with. In this case, public interest networks have adopted the practice of directly influencing policy-makers that was the prerogative of private interest groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)563-577
Number of pages15
JournalGlobalizations
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jun 7
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

free trade
civil society
political participation
public interest
lobbying
ASEAN
interest group
ASEM
globalization
political science
public
Asia
Free trade agreements
Civil society
Europe
Public interest

Keywords

  • civil society
  • East Asia
  • Europe
  • interregionalism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Interregionalism in Transnational Interest Networks : Euro-Asian Civil Society and the EU–ASEAN Free Trade Agreement. / Minambres Garcia, Ignacio Jose.

In: Globalizations, Vol. 14, No. 4, 07.06.2017, p. 563-577.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c560af623fc3479b8dd1d4147bd896a7,
title = "Interregionalism in Transnational Interest Networks: Euro-Asian Civil Society and the EU–ASEAN Free Trade Agreement",
abstract = "The study of interest groups is still a relatively small field of political science. The process of globalization has brought about the evolution of interest networks from national organizations to regional and transnational networks. This article uses the modes of political participation framework created by Jayasuriya and Rodan, in order to study the created spaces used by public interest networks at an interregional level. The empirical case study relates to Asia-Europe Meeting: the Europe-Asian interregional institution, and the work of public interest networks stemming from the civil society organizations that shadow it in opposing the EU–Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) free trade agreement (FTA). We find that the ‘modes of political participation’ model explains quite accurately the political spaces created by civil society in the EU–ASEAN FTA. We extend the framework by adding a fifth space, lobbying, which appears out of isomorphism. This concept represents the adoption by organizations of practices carried by other institutions they interact with. In this case, public interest networks have adopted the practice of directly influencing policy-makers that was the prerogative of private interest groups.",
keywords = "civil society, East Asia, Europe, interregionalism",
author = "{Minambres Garcia}, {Ignacio Jose}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1080/14747731.2016.1223959",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "563--577",
journal = "Globalizations",
issn = "1474-7731",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interregionalism in Transnational Interest Networks

T2 - Euro-Asian Civil Society and the EU–ASEAN Free Trade Agreement

AU - Minambres Garcia, Ignacio Jose

PY - 2017/6/7

Y1 - 2017/6/7

N2 - The study of interest groups is still a relatively small field of political science. The process of globalization has brought about the evolution of interest networks from national organizations to regional and transnational networks. This article uses the modes of political participation framework created by Jayasuriya and Rodan, in order to study the created spaces used by public interest networks at an interregional level. The empirical case study relates to Asia-Europe Meeting: the Europe-Asian interregional institution, and the work of public interest networks stemming from the civil society organizations that shadow it in opposing the EU–Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) free trade agreement (FTA). We find that the ‘modes of political participation’ model explains quite accurately the political spaces created by civil society in the EU–ASEAN FTA. We extend the framework by adding a fifth space, lobbying, which appears out of isomorphism. This concept represents the adoption by organizations of practices carried by other institutions they interact with. In this case, public interest networks have adopted the practice of directly influencing policy-makers that was the prerogative of private interest groups.

AB - The study of interest groups is still a relatively small field of political science. The process of globalization has brought about the evolution of interest networks from national organizations to regional and transnational networks. This article uses the modes of political participation framework created by Jayasuriya and Rodan, in order to study the created spaces used by public interest networks at an interregional level. The empirical case study relates to Asia-Europe Meeting: the Europe-Asian interregional institution, and the work of public interest networks stemming from the civil society organizations that shadow it in opposing the EU–Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) free trade agreement (FTA). We find that the ‘modes of political participation’ model explains quite accurately the political spaces created by civil society in the EU–ASEAN FTA. We extend the framework by adding a fifth space, lobbying, which appears out of isomorphism. This concept represents the adoption by organizations of practices carried by other institutions they interact with. In this case, public interest networks have adopted the practice of directly influencing policy-makers that was the prerogative of private interest groups.

KW - civil society

KW - East Asia

KW - Europe

KW - interregionalism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988317016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988317016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14747731.2016.1223959

DO - 10.1080/14747731.2016.1223959

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 563

EP - 577

JO - Globalizations

JF - Globalizations

SN - 1474-7731

IS - 4

ER -