Intrusive or co-operative? A cross-cultural study of interruption

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper highlights how interruptions are used within the system of turn-taking, referring to the rules of turn-taking set out by Sacks et al. (1974), and classifying the kinds of interruption used by conversational participants. I classify interruption into two main types: co-operative and intrusive. Intrusive interruption is further divided into three types: topic-changing, floor-taking, and disagreement interruptions. The occurence of these different types of interruption is examined in the data from three different interactions; NSE-NSE (Native Speakers of English), NSJ-NSJ (Native Speakers of Japanese), and NSE-JSE (Japanese Speakers of English) interactions. It is noted that the frequency of the use of the different types of interruption varies across cultures. Furthermore, this paper discusses interruption from the perspective of the sociocultural values attached to its use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)385-400
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Pragmatics
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

cultural studies
Population Groups
interaction
Values
Cross-cultural Studies
Interruption

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Intrusive or co-operative? A cross-cultural study of interruption. / Murata, Kumiko.

In: Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1994, p. 385-400.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cce00c6896e342f7bfeb1aa937627d42,
title = "Intrusive or co-operative? A cross-cultural study of interruption",
abstract = "This paper highlights how interruptions are used within the system of turn-taking, referring to the rules of turn-taking set out by Sacks et al. (1974), and classifying the kinds of interruption used by conversational participants. I classify interruption into two main types: co-operative and intrusive. Intrusive interruption is further divided into three types: topic-changing, floor-taking, and disagreement interruptions. The occurence of these different types of interruption is examined in the data from three different interactions; NSE-NSE (Native Speakers of English), NSJ-NSJ (Native Speakers of Japanese), and NSE-JSE (Japanese Speakers of English) interactions. It is noted that the frequency of the use of the different types of interruption varies across cultures. Furthermore, this paper discusses interruption from the perspective of the sociocultural values attached to its use.",
author = "Kumiko Murata",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1016/0378-2166(94)90011-6",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "385--400",
journal = "Journal of Pragmatics",
issn = "0378-2166",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intrusive or co-operative? A cross-cultural study of interruption

AU - Murata, Kumiko

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - This paper highlights how interruptions are used within the system of turn-taking, referring to the rules of turn-taking set out by Sacks et al. (1974), and classifying the kinds of interruption used by conversational participants. I classify interruption into two main types: co-operative and intrusive. Intrusive interruption is further divided into three types: topic-changing, floor-taking, and disagreement interruptions. The occurence of these different types of interruption is examined in the data from three different interactions; NSE-NSE (Native Speakers of English), NSJ-NSJ (Native Speakers of Japanese), and NSE-JSE (Japanese Speakers of English) interactions. It is noted that the frequency of the use of the different types of interruption varies across cultures. Furthermore, this paper discusses interruption from the perspective of the sociocultural values attached to its use.

AB - This paper highlights how interruptions are used within the system of turn-taking, referring to the rules of turn-taking set out by Sacks et al. (1974), and classifying the kinds of interruption used by conversational participants. I classify interruption into two main types: co-operative and intrusive. Intrusive interruption is further divided into three types: topic-changing, floor-taking, and disagreement interruptions. The occurence of these different types of interruption is examined in the data from three different interactions; NSE-NSE (Native Speakers of English), NSJ-NSJ (Native Speakers of Japanese), and NSE-JSE (Japanese Speakers of English) interactions. It is noted that the frequency of the use of the different types of interruption varies across cultures. Furthermore, this paper discusses interruption from the perspective of the sociocultural values attached to its use.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000955019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000955019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0378-2166(94)90011-6

DO - 10.1016/0378-2166(94)90011-6

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 385

EP - 400

JO - Journal of Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Pragmatics

SN - 0378-2166

IS - 4

ER -