It's harder to break a relationship when you commit long

Manabu Arai, Chie Nakamura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Past research has produced evidence that parsing commitments strengthen over the processing of additional linguistic elements that are consistent with the commitments and undoing strong commitments takes more time than undoing weak commitments. It remains unclear, however, whether this so-called digging-in effect is exclusively due to the length of an ambiguous region or at least partly to the extra cost of processing these additional phrases. The current study addressed this issue by testing Japanese relative clause structure, where lexical content and sentence meaning were controlled for. The results showed evidence for a digging-in effect reflecting the strengthened commitment to an incorrect analysis caused by the processing of additional adjuncts. Our study provides strong support for the dynamical, self-organizing models of sentence processing but poses a problem for other models including serial two-stage models as well as frequency-based probabilistic models such as the surprisal theory.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0156482
JournalPloS one
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jun 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Statistical Models
Linguistics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Processing
Research
probabilistic models
Testing
testing
Costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

It's harder to break a relationship when you commit long. / Arai, Manabu; Nakamura, Chie.

In: PloS one, Vol. 11, No. 6, e0156482, 01.06.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{055b6159f7b747afb875fb21b10df28c,
title = "It's harder to break a relationship when you commit long",
abstract = "Past research has produced evidence that parsing commitments strengthen over the processing of additional linguistic elements that are consistent with the commitments and undoing strong commitments takes more time than undoing weak commitments. It remains unclear, however, whether this so-called digging-in effect is exclusively due to the length of an ambiguous region or at least partly to the extra cost of processing these additional phrases. The current study addressed this issue by testing Japanese relative clause structure, where lexical content and sentence meaning were controlled for. The results showed evidence for a digging-in effect reflecting the strengthened commitment to an incorrect analysis caused by the processing of additional adjuncts. Our study provides strong support for the dynamical, self-organizing models of sentence processing but poses a problem for other models including serial two-stage models as well as frequency-based probabilistic models such as the surprisal theory.",
author = "Manabu Arai and Chie Nakamura",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0156482",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - It's harder to break a relationship when you commit long

AU - Arai, Manabu

AU - Nakamura, Chie

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Past research has produced evidence that parsing commitments strengthen over the processing of additional linguistic elements that are consistent with the commitments and undoing strong commitments takes more time than undoing weak commitments. It remains unclear, however, whether this so-called digging-in effect is exclusively due to the length of an ambiguous region or at least partly to the extra cost of processing these additional phrases. The current study addressed this issue by testing Japanese relative clause structure, where lexical content and sentence meaning were controlled for. The results showed evidence for a digging-in effect reflecting the strengthened commitment to an incorrect analysis caused by the processing of additional adjuncts. Our study provides strong support for the dynamical, self-organizing models of sentence processing but poses a problem for other models including serial two-stage models as well as frequency-based probabilistic models such as the surprisal theory.

AB - Past research has produced evidence that parsing commitments strengthen over the processing of additional linguistic elements that are consistent with the commitments and undoing strong commitments takes more time than undoing weak commitments. It remains unclear, however, whether this so-called digging-in effect is exclusively due to the length of an ambiguous region or at least partly to the extra cost of processing these additional phrases. The current study addressed this issue by testing Japanese relative clause structure, where lexical content and sentence meaning were controlled for. The results showed evidence for a digging-in effect reflecting the strengthened commitment to an incorrect analysis caused by the processing of additional adjuncts. Our study provides strong support for the dynamical, self-organizing models of sentence processing but poses a problem for other models including serial two-stage models as well as frequency-based probabilistic models such as the surprisal theory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974698252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84974698252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0156482

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0156482

M3 - Article

C2 - 27271881

AN - SCOPUS:84974698252

VL - 11

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 6

M1 - e0156482

ER -