Leadership across levels: Levels of leaders and their levels of impact

Leslie A. Dechurch; Nathan J. Hiller; Toshio Murase; Daniel Doty; Eduardo Salas

doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.009

Leadership across levels: Levels of leaders and their levels of impact

Leslie A. Dechurch, Nathan J. Hiller, Toshio Murase, Daniel Doty, Eduardo Salas

School of Commerce

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article assesses 25. years of empirical leadership research in 11 top journals with the goal of understanding current practice and future needs for drawing solid conclusions about leadership at different hierarchical levels of the organization, as well as leadership's effects on individuals, teams, units and organizations. We summarize the hierarchical level of leader and outcome level of analysis studied in different theoretical perspectives on leadership (traits, behavioral, transformational, LMX, strategic, shared) and by journal outlet. Among our findings, we observe that significantly less attention has been devoted to team- and unit-level emergent processes and outcomes, despite its conceptual relevance for leadership theory and practice. Four critical opportunities for advancing leadership science are presented.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1069-1085
Number of pages	17
Journal	Leadership Quarterly
Volume	21
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.009
Publication status	Published - 2010 Dec 1

Keywords

Emergent process
LMX
Leadership
Levels of analysis
Strategic management
Team
Transformational

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Business and International Management
Applied Psychology
Sociology and Political Science
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Access to Document

10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.009

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Leadership across levels: Levels of leaders and their levels of impact'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Dechurch, L. A., Hiller, N. J., Murase, T., Doty, D., & Salas, E. (2010). Leadership across levels: Levels of leaders and their levels of impact. Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1069-1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.009

@article{a238aefc937a4ff0a2654c8a2fd350a7,

title = "Leadership across levels: Levels of leaders and their levels of impact",

abstract = "This article assesses 25. years of empirical leadership research in 11 top journals with the goal of understanding current practice and future needs for drawing solid conclusions about leadership at different hierarchical levels of the organization, as well as leadership's effects on individuals, teams, units and organizations. We summarize the hierarchical level of leader and outcome level of analysis studied in different theoretical perspectives on leadership (traits, behavioral, transformational, LMX, strategic, shared) and by journal outlet. Among our findings, we observe that significantly less attention has been devoted to team- and unit-level emergent processes and outcomes, despite its conceptual relevance for leadership theory and practice. Four critical opportunities for advancing leadership science are presented.",

keywords = "Emergent process, LMX, Leadership, Levels of analysis, Strategic management, Team, Transformational",

author = "Dechurch, {Leslie A.} and Hiller, {Nathan J.} and Toshio Murase and Daniel Doty and Eduardo Salas",

year = "2010",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.009",

language = "English",

volume = "21",

pages = "1069--1085",

journal = "Leadership Quarterly",

issn = "1048-9843",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Leadership across levels

T2 - Levels of leaders and their levels of impact

AU - Dechurch, Leslie A.

AU - Hiller, Nathan J.

AU - Murase, Toshio

AU - Doty, Daniel

AU - Salas, Eduardo

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - This article assesses 25. years of empirical leadership research in 11 top journals with the goal of understanding current practice and future needs for drawing solid conclusions about leadership at different hierarchical levels of the organization, as well as leadership's effects on individuals, teams, units and organizations. We summarize the hierarchical level of leader and outcome level of analysis studied in different theoretical perspectives on leadership (traits, behavioral, transformational, LMX, strategic, shared) and by journal outlet. Among our findings, we observe that significantly less attention has been devoted to team- and unit-level emergent processes and outcomes, despite its conceptual relevance for leadership theory and practice. Four critical opportunities for advancing leadership science are presented.

AB - This article assesses 25. years of empirical leadership research in 11 top journals with the goal of understanding current practice and future needs for drawing solid conclusions about leadership at different hierarchical levels of the organization, as well as leadership's effects on individuals, teams, units and organizations. We summarize the hierarchical level of leader and outcome level of analysis studied in different theoretical perspectives on leadership (traits, behavioral, transformational, LMX, strategic, shared) and by journal outlet. Among our findings, we observe that significantly less attention has been devoted to team- and unit-level emergent processes and outcomes, despite its conceptual relevance for leadership theory and practice. Four critical opportunities for advancing leadership science are presented.

KW - Emergent process

KW - LMX

KW - Leadership

KW - Levels of analysis

KW - Strategic management

KW - Team

KW - Transformational

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649910698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649910698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.009

DO - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.009

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:78649910698

VL - 21

SP - 1069

EP - 1085

JO - Leadership Quarterly

JF - Leadership Quarterly

SN - 1048-9843

IS - 6

ER -