Liberal democracy and beyond: Extending the sequencing debate

Christopher Edward Hobson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The extreme optimism that shaped the nascent democracy promotion community in the 1980s and early 1990s has been strongly tempered by an increasing number of setbacks to the global expansion of democracy. Zakaria's influential 'illiberal democracies' argument was an early example of this trend towards a more uncertain outlook about democracy's prospects. His argument was useful in focusing attention on the conceptual underpinnings of these practices. Despite the promising starting point, Zakaria reached limited and conservative conclusions, essentially calling for the revival of a Whig approach: liberalism first, democracy later. Furthermore, his conceptual analysis was overly restricted: democracies are liberal or they are illiberal. This article challenges, revises, and extends Zakaria's arguments, by examining alternative models of democracy that lie both within and beyond liberalism. It is argued that in contrast to Zakaria's suggestion that democracy promotion may need to be delayed or deferred, considering different democratic models offers a more optimistic prognosis, as the way forward is not through abandoning the support of democracy, but, instead, potentially through advancing a different form of democracy, one more suitable to a precise local context.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)441-454
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Political Science Review
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Sep
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

democracy
liberalism
promotion
optimism
trend
community

Keywords

  • democracy promotion
  • democratization
  • illiberal democracy
  • liberalism
  • sequencing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Liberal democracy and beyond : Extending the sequencing debate. / Hobson, Christopher Edward.

In: International Political Science Review, Vol. 33, No. 4, 09.2012, p. 441-454.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hobson, Christopher Edward. / Liberal democracy and beyond : Extending the sequencing debate. In: International Political Science Review. 2012 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 441-454.
@article{f885a61d420149daae35454a1ff1b734,
title = "Liberal democracy and beyond: Extending the sequencing debate",
abstract = "The extreme optimism that shaped the nascent democracy promotion community in the 1980s and early 1990s has been strongly tempered by an increasing number of setbacks to the global expansion of democracy. Zakaria's influential 'illiberal democracies' argument was an early example of this trend towards a more uncertain outlook about democracy's prospects. His argument was useful in focusing attention on the conceptual underpinnings of these practices. Despite the promising starting point, Zakaria reached limited and conservative conclusions, essentially calling for the revival of a Whig approach: liberalism first, democracy later. Furthermore, his conceptual analysis was overly restricted: democracies are liberal or they are illiberal. This article challenges, revises, and extends Zakaria's arguments, by examining alternative models of democracy that lie both within and beyond liberalism. It is argued that in contrast to Zakaria's suggestion that democracy promotion may need to be delayed or deferred, considering different democratic models offers a more optimistic prognosis, as the way forward is not through abandoning the support of democracy, but, instead, potentially through advancing a different form of democracy, one more suitable to a precise local context.",
keywords = "democracy promotion, democratization, illiberal democracy, liberalism, sequencing",
author = "Hobson, {Christopher Edward}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1177/0192512111432563",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "441--454",
journal = "International Political Science Review",
issn = "0192-5121",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Liberal democracy and beyond

T2 - Extending the sequencing debate

AU - Hobson, Christopher Edward

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - The extreme optimism that shaped the nascent democracy promotion community in the 1980s and early 1990s has been strongly tempered by an increasing number of setbacks to the global expansion of democracy. Zakaria's influential 'illiberal democracies' argument was an early example of this trend towards a more uncertain outlook about democracy's prospects. His argument was useful in focusing attention on the conceptual underpinnings of these practices. Despite the promising starting point, Zakaria reached limited and conservative conclusions, essentially calling for the revival of a Whig approach: liberalism first, democracy later. Furthermore, his conceptual analysis was overly restricted: democracies are liberal or they are illiberal. This article challenges, revises, and extends Zakaria's arguments, by examining alternative models of democracy that lie both within and beyond liberalism. It is argued that in contrast to Zakaria's suggestion that democracy promotion may need to be delayed or deferred, considering different democratic models offers a more optimistic prognosis, as the way forward is not through abandoning the support of democracy, but, instead, potentially through advancing a different form of democracy, one more suitable to a precise local context.

AB - The extreme optimism that shaped the nascent democracy promotion community in the 1980s and early 1990s has been strongly tempered by an increasing number of setbacks to the global expansion of democracy. Zakaria's influential 'illiberal democracies' argument was an early example of this trend towards a more uncertain outlook about democracy's prospects. His argument was useful in focusing attention on the conceptual underpinnings of these practices. Despite the promising starting point, Zakaria reached limited and conservative conclusions, essentially calling for the revival of a Whig approach: liberalism first, democracy later. Furthermore, his conceptual analysis was overly restricted: democracies are liberal or they are illiberal. This article challenges, revises, and extends Zakaria's arguments, by examining alternative models of democracy that lie both within and beyond liberalism. It is argued that in contrast to Zakaria's suggestion that democracy promotion may need to be delayed or deferred, considering different democratic models offers a more optimistic prognosis, as the way forward is not through abandoning the support of democracy, but, instead, potentially through advancing a different form of democracy, one more suitable to a precise local context.

KW - democracy promotion

KW - democratization

KW - illiberal democracy

KW - liberalism

KW - sequencing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865725333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865725333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0192512111432563

DO - 10.1177/0192512111432563

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84865725333

VL - 33

SP - 441

EP - 454

JO - International Political Science Review

JF - International Political Science Review

SN - 0192-5121

IS - 4

ER -