Linking outputs and outcomes from devolved forest governance using a Modified Actor-Power-Accountability Framework (MAPAF): Case study from Chilimo forest, Ethiopia

Abrar Juhar Mohammed, Makoto Inoue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent changes in the policy and institutional framework for forestry of Ethiopia emphasize the decentralization of power including through devolution. With the aim of filling the gap in the literature on Ethiopia, this study explored the actors involved, the nature of power they hold, the accountability relationships among actors and the social and environmental outcomes of the devolved governance system using a Modified Actor-Power-Accountability Framework (MAPAF). The results indicated that discretionary decision-making space is created for the local population and the leaders of Forest Cooperatives to manage and protect the forest and use it for subsistence purposes. To generate income from their withdrawal rights, however, local actors require approval from a mid-level actor, the Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise. Devolution has improved physical and human conditions and the benefits from natural capital, which were identified as salient for the local population as a means of coping with their vulnerabilities and for income generation. The environmental outcome differed depending on the policy followed by the mid-level partner organizations that make decisions with the local population on income-generating activities from the sale of forest resources. Overall, elite capture and the recent emphasis on income generation over forest conservation were identified as key factors hampering positive social and environmental outcomes from the devolved governance system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-31
Number of pages11
JournalForest Policy and Economics
Volume39
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Feb
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

governance
accountability
Ethiopia
income
case studies
local population
responsibility
devolution
decentralization
natural capital
decentralization of power
institutional framework
politics
forest resources
forest resource
subsistence
sales
cooperatives
decision making
forestry

Keywords

  • Devolution
  • Environmental outcome
  • Ethiopia
  • MAPAF
  • Policy
  • Social outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{398c3af59fe04c089ff5b2c64918641d,
title = "Linking outputs and outcomes from devolved forest governance using a Modified Actor-Power-Accountability Framework (MAPAF): Case study from Chilimo forest, Ethiopia",
abstract = "Recent changes in the policy and institutional framework for forestry of Ethiopia emphasize the decentralization of power including through devolution. With the aim of filling the gap in the literature on Ethiopia, this study explored the actors involved, the nature of power they hold, the accountability relationships among actors and the social and environmental outcomes of the devolved governance system using a Modified Actor-Power-Accountability Framework (MAPAF). The results indicated that discretionary decision-making space is created for the local population and the leaders of Forest Cooperatives to manage and protect the forest and use it for subsistence purposes. To generate income from their withdrawal rights, however, local actors require approval from a mid-level actor, the Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise. Devolution has improved physical and human conditions and the benefits from natural capital, which were identified as salient for the local population as a means of coping with their vulnerabilities and for income generation. The environmental outcome differed depending on the policy followed by the mid-level partner organizations that make decisions with the local population on income-generating activities from the sale of forest resources. Overall, elite capture and the recent emphasis on income generation over forest conservation were identified as key factors hampering positive social and environmental outcomes from the devolved governance system.",
keywords = "Devolution, Environmental outcome, Ethiopia, MAPAF, Policy, Social outcome",
author = "Mohammed, {Abrar Juhar} and Makoto Inoue",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.forpol.2013.11.005",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "21--31",
journal = "Forest Policy and Economics",
issn = "1389-9341",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Linking outputs and outcomes from devolved forest governance using a Modified Actor-Power-Accountability Framework (MAPAF)

T2 - Case study from Chilimo forest, Ethiopia

AU - Mohammed, Abrar Juhar

AU - Inoue, Makoto

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Recent changes in the policy and institutional framework for forestry of Ethiopia emphasize the decentralization of power including through devolution. With the aim of filling the gap in the literature on Ethiopia, this study explored the actors involved, the nature of power they hold, the accountability relationships among actors and the social and environmental outcomes of the devolved governance system using a Modified Actor-Power-Accountability Framework (MAPAF). The results indicated that discretionary decision-making space is created for the local population and the leaders of Forest Cooperatives to manage and protect the forest and use it for subsistence purposes. To generate income from their withdrawal rights, however, local actors require approval from a mid-level actor, the Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise. Devolution has improved physical and human conditions and the benefits from natural capital, which were identified as salient for the local population as a means of coping with their vulnerabilities and for income generation. The environmental outcome differed depending on the policy followed by the mid-level partner organizations that make decisions with the local population on income-generating activities from the sale of forest resources. Overall, elite capture and the recent emphasis on income generation over forest conservation were identified as key factors hampering positive social and environmental outcomes from the devolved governance system.

AB - Recent changes in the policy and institutional framework for forestry of Ethiopia emphasize the decentralization of power including through devolution. With the aim of filling the gap in the literature on Ethiopia, this study explored the actors involved, the nature of power they hold, the accountability relationships among actors and the social and environmental outcomes of the devolved governance system using a Modified Actor-Power-Accountability Framework (MAPAF). The results indicated that discretionary decision-making space is created for the local population and the leaders of Forest Cooperatives to manage and protect the forest and use it for subsistence purposes. To generate income from their withdrawal rights, however, local actors require approval from a mid-level actor, the Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise. Devolution has improved physical and human conditions and the benefits from natural capital, which were identified as salient for the local population as a means of coping with their vulnerabilities and for income generation. The environmental outcome differed depending on the policy followed by the mid-level partner organizations that make decisions with the local population on income-generating activities from the sale of forest resources. Overall, elite capture and the recent emphasis on income generation over forest conservation were identified as key factors hampering positive social and environmental outcomes from the devolved governance system.

KW - Devolution

KW - Environmental outcome

KW - Ethiopia

KW - MAPAF

KW - Policy

KW - Social outcome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891739757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891739757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.11.005

DO - 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.11.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84891739757

VL - 39

SP - 21

EP - 31

JO - Forest Policy and Economics

JF - Forest Policy and Economics

SN - 1389-9341

ER -