Lost in Translation or Lost in Your Neighbor's Yard

The Moderating Role of Leverage and Protection Mechanisms for the MNC Subsidiary Technology Sourcing-Performance Relationship

Sean Tsu Hsiang Hsu, Akie Iriyama, John E. Prescott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The MNC subsidiary technology development process involves the interplay among three components; sourcing, leverage and protection. Subsidiaries source technology from headquarters, local collaborators and their own R&D activity. Research has focused on the performance impact of sourcing, but has overlooked how leverage and protection mechanisms contribute to the creation and capture of value from sourced technology. Adopting a configuration-based lens grounded in the resource and knowledge-based perspectives, we conceptualize subsidiary sourcing along two dimensions: organizational boundaries making technology more or less difficult to protect and geographical country boundaries making technology more or less difficult to leverage. When a sourced technology is matched with appropriate leverage or protection mechanisms, subsidiaries are better able to create or capture value. Using a survey panel dataset of 1971 Taiwanese subsidiaries our conjectures were supported. Sourcing from local collaborators which occurs across organizational boundaries was most highly associated with profitability when protection mechanisms were in place, while sourcing from headquarters which occurs across geographical boundaries was most highly associated with profitability when leverage mechanisms were developed. We contribute to the subsidiary technology sourcing and performance management literatures by theorizing how the interplay among components of the technology development process contributes to creating and capturing value.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-99
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of International Management
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Subsidiaries
Leverage
Technology sourcing
Sourcing
Profitability
Development process
Headquarters
Organizational boundaries
Technology development
Knowledge-based
Resource-based
Performance management
Theorizing
Value capture

Keywords

  • Knowledge transfer
  • Resource-based and knowledge-based perspectives
  • Subsidiary performance
  • Technology leverage and protection
  • Technology sourcing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Finance

Cite this

@article{1f7874f5e72744a3947fcbd90e02d899,
title = "Lost in Translation or Lost in Your Neighbor's Yard: The Moderating Role of Leverage and Protection Mechanisms for the MNC Subsidiary Technology Sourcing-Performance Relationship",
abstract = "The MNC subsidiary technology development process involves the interplay among three components; sourcing, leverage and protection. Subsidiaries source technology from headquarters, local collaborators and their own R&D activity. Research has focused on the performance impact of sourcing, but has overlooked how leverage and protection mechanisms contribute to the creation and capture of value from sourced technology. Adopting a configuration-based lens grounded in the resource and knowledge-based perspectives, we conceptualize subsidiary sourcing along two dimensions: organizational boundaries making technology more or less difficult to protect and geographical country boundaries making technology more or less difficult to leverage. When a sourced technology is matched with appropriate leverage or protection mechanisms, subsidiaries are better able to create or capture value. Using a survey panel dataset of 1971 Taiwanese subsidiaries our conjectures were supported. Sourcing from local collaborators which occurs across organizational boundaries was most highly associated with profitability when protection mechanisms were in place, while sourcing from headquarters which occurs across geographical boundaries was most highly associated with profitability when leverage mechanisms were developed. We contribute to the subsidiary technology sourcing and performance management literatures by theorizing how the interplay among components of the technology development process contributes to creating and capturing value.",
keywords = "Knowledge transfer, Resource-based and knowledge-based perspectives, Subsidiary performance, Technology leverage and protection, Technology sourcing",
author = "Hsu, {Sean Tsu Hsiang} and Akie Iriyama and Prescott, {John E.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.intman.2015.11.001",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "84--99",
journal = "Journal of International Management",
issn = "1075-4253",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lost in Translation or Lost in Your Neighbor's Yard

T2 - The Moderating Role of Leverage and Protection Mechanisms for the MNC Subsidiary Technology Sourcing-Performance Relationship

AU - Hsu, Sean Tsu Hsiang

AU - Iriyama, Akie

AU - Prescott, John E.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - The MNC subsidiary technology development process involves the interplay among three components; sourcing, leverage and protection. Subsidiaries source technology from headquarters, local collaborators and their own R&D activity. Research has focused on the performance impact of sourcing, but has overlooked how leverage and protection mechanisms contribute to the creation and capture of value from sourced technology. Adopting a configuration-based lens grounded in the resource and knowledge-based perspectives, we conceptualize subsidiary sourcing along two dimensions: organizational boundaries making technology more or less difficult to protect and geographical country boundaries making technology more or less difficult to leverage. When a sourced technology is matched with appropriate leverage or protection mechanisms, subsidiaries are better able to create or capture value. Using a survey panel dataset of 1971 Taiwanese subsidiaries our conjectures were supported. Sourcing from local collaborators which occurs across organizational boundaries was most highly associated with profitability when protection mechanisms were in place, while sourcing from headquarters which occurs across geographical boundaries was most highly associated with profitability when leverage mechanisms were developed. We contribute to the subsidiary technology sourcing and performance management literatures by theorizing how the interplay among components of the technology development process contributes to creating and capturing value.

AB - The MNC subsidiary technology development process involves the interplay among three components; sourcing, leverage and protection. Subsidiaries source technology from headquarters, local collaborators and their own R&D activity. Research has focused on the performance impact of sourcing, but has overlooked how leverage and protection mechanisms contribute to the creation and capture of value from sourced technology. Adopting a configuration-based lens grounded in the resource and knowledge-based perspectives, we conceptualize subsidiary sourcing along two dimensions: organizational boundaries making technology more or less difficult to protect and geographical country boundaries making technology more or less difficult to leverage. When a sourced technology is matched with appropriate leverage or protection mechanisms, subsidiaries are better able to create or capture value. Using a survey panel dataset of 1971 Taiwanese subsidiaries our conjectures were supported. Sourcing from local collaborators which occurs across organizational boundaries was most highly associated with profitability when protection mechanisms were in place, while sourcing from headquarters which occurs across geographical boundaries was most highly associated with profitability when leverage mechanisms were developed. We contribute to the subsidiary technology sourcing and performance management literatures by theorizing how the interplay among components of the technology development process contributes to creating and capturing value.

KW - Knowledge transfer

KW - Resource-based and knowledge-based perspectives

KW - Subsidiary performance

KW - Technology leverage and protection

KW - Technology sourcing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960396453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960396453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.intman.2015.11.001

DO - 10.1016/j.intman.2015.11.001

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 84

EP - 99

JO - Journal of International Management

JF - Journal of International Management

SN - 1075-4253

IS - 1

ER -