Management of science, serendipity, and research performance: Evidence from a survey of scientists in Japan and the U.S.

Kota Murayama, Makoto Nirei, Hiroshi Shimizu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In science, research teams are increasing in size, which suggests that science is becoming more organisational. This paper aims to empirically investigate the effects of the division of labour in management and science on serendipity, which has been considered one of the great factors in science. Specifically, in examining the survey of scientists conducted in Japan and the U.S., this paper treats the following questions: Does pursuing serendipity really bring about better scientific outcomes? How does the division of labour in science influence serendipity and publication productivity? The empirical results suggest that serendipity actually brings about better research quality on average. It also finds that if the managerial role is played by a leading scientist in the team, this is positively associated with the quality of the paper through allowing researchers to pursue serendipitous findings. In contrast, if the managerial role and leading research role are played by different members, this has a positive association with the number of papers published, as the project size becomes larger. These results indicate there is a trade-off between serendipity and publication productivity in science via who plays the leading role in research and management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)862-873
Number of pages12
JournalResearch Policy
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 May 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Productivity
Personnel
Serendipity
Japan
Research performance
Managerial roles
Division of labor
Factors
Research quality
Trade-offs
Empirical results

Keywords

  • Productivity
  • Research management
  • Science
  • Serendipity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Management of science, serendipity, and research performance : Evidence from a survey of scientists in Japan and the U.S. / Murayama, Kota; Nirei, Makoto; Shimizu, Hiroshi.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 44, No. 4, 01.05.2015, p. 862-873.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a147aa2421d2418fab39933e141e7a75,
title = "Management of science, serendipity, and research performance: Evidence from a survey of scientists in Japan and the U.S.",
abstract = "In science, research teams are increasing in size, which suggests that science is becoming more organisational. This paper aims to empirically investigate the effects of the division of labour in management and science on serendipity, which has been considered one of the great factors in science. Specifically, in examining the survey of scientists conducted in Japan and the U.S., this paper treats the following questions: Does pursuing serendipity really bring about better scientific outcomes? How does the division of labour in science influence serendipity and publication productivity? The empirical results suggest that serendipity actually brings about better research quality on average. It also finds that if the managerial role is played by a leading scientist in the team, this is positively associated with the quality of the paper through allowing researchers to pursue serendipitous findings. In contrast, if the managerial role and leading research role are played by different members, this has a positive association with the number of papers published, as the project size becomes larger. These results indicate there is a trade-off between serendipity and publication productivity in science via who plays the leading role in research and management.",
keywords = "Productivity, Research management, Science, Serendipity",
author = "Kota Murayama and Makoto Nirei and Hiroshi Shimizu",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.018",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "862--873",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of science, serendipity, and research performance

T2 - Evidence from a survey of scientists in Japan and the U.S.

AU - Murayama, Kota

AU - Nirei, Makoto

AU - Shimizu, Hiroshi

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - In science, research teams are increasing in size, which suggests that science is becoming more organisational. This paper aims to empirically investigate the effects of the division of labour in management and science on serendipity, which has been considered one of the great factors in science. Specifically, in examining the survey of scientists conducted in Japan and the U.S., this paper treats the following questions: Does pursuing serendipity really bring about better scientific outcomes? How does the division of labour in science influence serendipity and publication productivity? The empirical results suggest that serendipity actually brings about better research quality on average. It also finds that if the managerial role is played by a leading scientist in the team, this is positively associated with the quality of the paper through allowing researchers to pursue serendipitous findings. In contrast, if the managerial role and leading research role are played by different members, this has a positive association with the number of papers published, as the project size becomes larger. These results indicate there is a trade-off between serendipity and publication productivity in science via who plays the leading role in research and management.

AB - In science, research teams are increasing in size, which suggests that science is becoming more organisational. This paper aims to empirically investigate the effects of the division of labour in management and science on serendipity, which has been considered one of the great factors in science. Specifically, in examining the survey of scientists conducted in Japan and the U.S., this paper treats the following questions: Does pursuing serendipity really bring about better scientific outcomes? How does the division of labour in science influence serendipity and publication productivity? The empirical results suggest that serendipity actually brings about better research quality on average. It also finds that if the managerial role is played by a leading scientist in the team, this is positively associated with the quality of the paper through allowing researchers to pursue serendipitous findings. In contrast, if the managerial role and leading research role are played by different members, this has a positive association with the number of papers published, as the project size becomes larger. These results indicate there is a trade-off between serendipity and publication productivity in science via who plays the leading role in research and management.

KW - Productivity

KW - Research management

KW - Science

KW - Serendipity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925806286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925806286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.018

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.018

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84925806286

VL - 44

SP - 862

EP - 873

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 4

ER -