Measuring performance of aerial projection of 3D Hologram Object (3DHO)

I. Septiana Asyifa, Jiono Mahfud, Takafumi Matsumaru

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The Aerial Projection of 3D Hologram Object (3DHO) which we have proposed, is a hand gesture-based control system with an interactive 3D hologram object floating in mid-air as the hand movement reference. This system mainly consists of the pyramid-shaped reflector which produces 3D hologram object, the parabolic mirror, and the leap motion controller for capturing hand gesture command. The user can control or interact with 3DHO by using their finger or a baton-shaped object. This paper is focusing on the evaluation of the 3DHO by comparing it to other 3D input devices (such as joystick with a slider, joystick without the slider, and gamepad) on five different positioning tasks. We also investigate the assessment of comfort, ease of learning, and user satisfaction by questionnaire survey. From the experimentation, we learn that 3DHO is not good to use in one-dimensional workspace task, but has a good performance in two-dimensional and three-dimensional workspace tasks. From questionnaire results, we found out that 3DHO is averagely comfortable but may cause some fatigues around arm and shoulder. It is also easy to learn but not satisfying enough to use.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2017
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages2081-2086
Number of pages6
Volume2018-January
ISBN (Electronic)9781538637418
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Mar 23
Event2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2017 - Macau, China
Duration: 2017 Dec 52017 Dec 8

Other

Other2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2017
CountryChina
CityMacau
Period17/12/517/12/8

Fingerprint

Hologram
Holograms
Projection
Antennas
Workspace
Gesture
Questionnaire
Input Devices
User Satisfaction
Object
Pyramid
Reflector
Fatigue
Experimentation
Mirrors
Positioning
Mirror
Fatigue of materials
Control systems
Control System

Keywords

  • 3D hologram
  • aerial projection
  • interactive human-computer interface
  • usability testing
  • user satisfaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Control and Optimization
  • Modelling and Simulation

Cite this

Asyifa, I. S., Mahfud, J., & Matsumaru, T. (2018). Measuring performance of aerial projection of 3D Hologram Object (3DHO). In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2017 (Vol. 2018-January, pp. 2081-2086). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2017.8324726

Measuring performance of aerial projection of 3D Hologram Object (3DHO). / Asyifa, I. Septiana; Mahfud, Jiono; Matsumaru, Takafumi.

2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2017. Vol. 2018-January Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2018. p. 2081-2086.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Asyifa, IS, Mahfud, J & Matsumaru, T 2018, Measuring performance of aerial projection of 3D Hologram Object (3DHO). in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2017. vol. 2018-January, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 2081-2086, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2017, Macau, China, 17/12/5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2017.8324726
Asyifa IS, Mahfud J, Matsumaru T. Measuring performance of aerial projection of 3D Hologram Object (3DHO). In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2017. Vol. 2018-January. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2018. p. 2081-2086 https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2017.8324726
Asyifa, I. Septiana ; Mahfud, Jiono ; Matsumaru, Takafumi. / Measuring performance of aerial projection of 3D Hologram Object (3DHO). 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2017. Vol. 2018-January Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2018. pp. 2081-2086
@inproceedings{952b2bc0dc614d289f36d74f0794f102,
title = "Measuring performance of aerial projection of 3D Hologram Object (3DHO)",
abstract = "The Aerial Projection of 3D Hologram Object (3DHO) which we have proposed, is a hand gesture-based control system with an interactive 3D hologram object floating in mid-air as the hand movement reference. This system mainly consists of the pyramid-shaped reflector which produces 3D hologram object, the parabolic mirror, and the leap motion controller for capturing hand gesture command. The user can control or interact with 3DHO by using their finger or a baton-shaped object. This paper is focusing on the evaluation of the 3DHO by comparing it to other 3D input devices (such as joystick with a slider, joystick without the slider, and gamepad) on five different positioning tasks. We also investigate the assessment of comfort, ease of learning, and user satisfaction by questionnaire survey. From the experimentation, we learn that 3DHO is not good to use in one-dimensional workspace task, but has a good performance in two-dimensional and three-dimensional workspace tasks. From questionnaire results, we found out that 3DHO is averagely comfortable but may cause some fatigues around arm and shoulder. It is also easy to learn but not satisfying enough to use.",
keywords = "3D hologram, aerial projection, interactive human-computer interface, usability testing, user satisfaction",
author = "Asyifa, {I. Septiana} and Jiono Mahfud and Takafumi Matsumaru",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1109/ROBIO.2017.8324726",
language = "English",
volume = "2018-January",
pages = "2081--2086",
booktitle = "2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2017",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Measuring performance of aerial projection of 3D Hologram Object (3DHO)

AU - Asyifa, I. Septiana

AU - Mahfud, Jiono

AU - Matsumaru, Takafumi

PY - 2018/3/23

Y1 - 2018/3/23

N2 - The Aerial Projection of 3D Hologram Object (3DHO) which we have proposed, is a hand gesture-based control system with an interactive 3D hologram object floating in mid-air as the hand movement reference. This system mainly consists of the pyramid-shaped reflector which produces 3D hologram object, the parabolic mirror, and the leap motion controller for capturing hand gesture command. The user can control or interact with 3DHO by using their finger or a baton-shaped object. This paper is focusing on the evaluation of the 3DHO by comparing it to other 3D input devices (such as joystick with a slider, joystick without the slider, and gamepad) on five different positioning tasks. We also investigate the assessment of comfort, ease of learning, and user satisfaction by questionnaire survey. From the experimentation, we learn that 3DHO is not good to use in one-dimensional workspace task, but has a good performance in two-dimensional and three-dimensional workspace tasks. From questionnaire results, we found out that 3DHO is averagely comfortable but may cause some fatigues around arm and shoulder. It is also easy to learn but not satisfying enough to use.

AB - The Aerial Projection of 3D Hologram Object (3DHO) which we have proposed, is a hand gesture-based control system with an interactive 3D hologram object floating in mid-air as the hand movement reference. This system mainly consists of the pyramid-shaped reflector which produces 3D hologram object, the parabolic mirror, and the leap motion controller for capturing hand gesture command. The user can control or interact with 3DHO by using their finger or a baton-shaped object. This paper is focusing on the evaluation of the 3DHO by comparing it to other 3D input devices (such as joystick with a slider, joystick without the slider, and gamepad) on five different positioning tasks. We also investigate the assessment of comfort, ease of learning, and user satisfaction by questionnaire survey. From the experimentation, we learn that 3DHO is not good to use in one-dimensional workspace task, but has a good performance in two-dimensional and three-dimensional workspace tasks. From questionnaire results, we found out that 3DHO is averagely comfortable but may cause some fatigues around arm and shoulder. It is also easy to learn but not satisfying enough to use.

KW - 3D hologram

KW - aerial projection

KW - interactive human-computer interface

KW - usability testing

KW - user satisfaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049953735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049953735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ROBIO.2017.8324726

DO - 10.1109/ROBIO.2017.8324726

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85049953735

VL - 2018-January

SP - 2081

EP - 2086

BT - 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2017

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

ER -