Mental model metrics and team adaptability: A multi-facet multi-method examination

Christian J. Resick, Toshio Murase, Wendy L. Bedwell, Elizabeth Sanz, Miliani Jiménez, Leslie A. DeChurch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper empirically examines the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of three team mental model measurement approaches. Specifically, this study measures the similarity (MM-similarity) and quality (MM-quality) facets of team strategy-focused mental models using structural networks, priority rankings, and importance ratings. The convergent and divergent relationships among the three mental model metrics are then examined via a multi-facet multi-method matrix. Finally, the relative utility of each metric for understanding the relationships between team mental models, team adaptability, and decision effectiveness are compared. The study was conducted in a laboratory setting, modeling 56 four-person decision-making teams. Results indicate little convergent and extensive discriminant validity across the three mental model metrics. In addition, only mental models measured using the structural networks metric were found to have predictive validity in relation to team adaptation and performance. The quality and similarity of team structural networks were found to have interactive effects in relation to adaptation such that mental model quality was most strongly related to adaptation for teams with low mental model similarity and unrelated to adaptation for teams with high similarity. In turn, adaptation was critical for team decision effectiveness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)332-349
Number of pages18
JournalGroup Dynamics
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Dec
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Structural Models
Decision Making

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Team adaptability
  • Team mental models
  • Teams

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Resick, C. J., Murase, T., Bedwell, W. L., Sanz, E., Jiménez, M., & DeChurch, L. A. (2010). Mental model metrics and team adaptability: A multi-facet multi-method examination. Group Dynamics, 14(4), 332-349. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018822

Mental model metrics and team adaptability : A multi-facet multi-method examination. / Resick, Christian J.; Murase, Toshio; Bedwell, Wendy L.; Sanz, Elizabeth; Jiménez, Miliani; DeChurch, Leslie A.

In: Group Dynamics, Vol. 14, No. 4, 12.2010, p. 332-349.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Resick, CJ, Murase, T, Bedwell, WL, Sanz, E, Jiménez, M & DeChurch, LA 2010, 'Mental model metrics and team adaptability: A multi-facet multi-method examination', Group Dynamics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 332-349. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018822
Resick, Christian J. ; Murase, Toshio ; Bedwell, Wendy L. ; Sanz, Elizabeth ; Jiménez, Miliani ; DeChurch, Leslie A. / Mental model metrics and team adaptability : A multi-facet multi-method examination. In: Group Dynamics. 2010 ; Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 332-349.
@article{e2c6d8222d00468aa91a63f4c075cdb7,
title = "Mental model metrics and team adaptability: A multi-facet multi-method examination",
abstract = "This paper empirically examines the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of three team mental model measurement approaches. Specifically, this study measures the similarity (MM-similarity) and quality (MM-quality) facets of team strategy-focused mental models using structural networks, priority rankings, and importance ratings. The convergent and divergent relationships among the three mental model metrics are then examined via a multi-facet multi-method matrix. Finally, the relative utility of each metric for understanding the relationships between team mental models, team adaptability, and decision effectiveness are compared. The study was conducted in a laboratory setting, modeling 56 four-person decision-making teams. Results indicate little convergent and extensive discriminant validity across the three mental model metrics. In addition, only mental models measured using the structural networks metric were found to have predictive validity in relation to team adaptation and performance. The quality and similarity of team structural networks were found to have interactive effects in relation to adaptation such that mental model quality was most strongly related to adaptation for teams with low mental model similarity and unrelated to adaptation for teams with high similarity. In turn, adaptation was critical for team decision effectiveness.",
keywords = "Cognition, Team adaptability, Team mental models, Teams",
author = "Resick, {Christian J.} and Toshio Murase and Bedwell, {Wendy L.} and Elizabeth Sanz and Miliani Jim{\'e}nez and DeChurch, {Leslie A.}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1037/a0018822",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "332--349",
journal = "Group Dynamics",
issn = "1089-2699",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mental model metrics and team adaptability

T2 - A multi-facet multi-method examination

AU - Resick, Christian J.

AU - Murase, Toshio

AU - Bedwell, Wendy L.

AU - Sanz, Elizabeth

AU - Jiménez, Miliani

AU - DeChurch, Leslie A.

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - This paper empirically examines the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of three team mental model measurement approaches. Specifically, this study measures the similarity (MM-similarity) and quality (MM-quality) facets of team strategy-focused mental models using structural networks, priority rankings, and importance ratings. The convergent and divergent relationships among the three mental model metrics are then examined via a multi-facet multi-method matrix. Finally, the relative utility of each metric for understanding the relationships between team mental models, team adaptability, and decision effectiveness are compared. The study was conducted in a laboratory setting, modeling 56 four-person decision-making teams. Results indicate little convergent and extensive discriminant validity across the three mental model metrics. In addition, only mental models measured using the structural networks metric were found to have predictive validity in relation to team adaptation and performance. The quality and similarity of team structural networks were found to have interactive effects in relation to adaptation such that mental model quality was most strongly related to adaptation for teams with low mental model similarity and unrelated to adaptation for teams with high similarity. In turn, adaptation was critical for team decision effectiveness.

AB - This paper empirically examines the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of three team mental model measurement approaches. Specifically, this study measures the similarity (MM-similarity) and quality (MM-quality) facets of team strategy-focused mental models using structural networks, priority rankings, and importance ratings. The convergent and divergent relationships among the three mental model metrics are then examined via a multi-facet multi-method matrix. Finally, the relative utility of each metric for understanding the relationships between team mental models, team adaptability, and decision effectiveness are compared. The study was conducted in a laboratory setting, modeling 56 four-person decision-making teams. Results indicate little convergent and extensive discriminant validity across the three mental model metrics. In addition, only mental models measured using the structural networks metric were found to have predictive validity in relation to team adaptation and performance. The quality and similarity of team structural networks were found to have interactive effects in relation to adaptation such that mental model quality was most strongly related to adaptation for teams with low mental model similarity and unrelated to adaptation for teams with high similarity. In turn, adaptation was critical for team decision effectiveness.

KW - Cognition

KW - Team adaptability

KW - Team mental models

KW - Teams

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650376722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650376722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0018822

DO - 10.1037/a0018822

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78650376722

VL - 14

SP - 332

EP - 349

JO - Group Dynamics

JF - Group Dynamics

SN - 1089-2699

IS - 4

ER -