MNE institutional advantage: How subunits shape, transpose and evade host country institutions

Patrick Regnér, Jesper Carl Goeran Edman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scholars increasingly emphasize the impact of institutions on multinational enterprises (MNEs), but the opposite relationship has attracted less research - that is, MNE agency in relation to institutions. Based on a comparative case study of six MNEs from the United States and Sweden, this paper remedies this. It explores and explicates MNE subunits' strategic responses to host country institutional constraints and opportunities in five different regions. A new-institutional approach is adopted, which allows for an investigation of MNE subunit agency in relation to normative and cognitive institutions, as well as regulative ones. This fine-grained analysis reveals not only what kinds of responses MNE subunits invoke, but why and how they are able to respond. We identify four strategic responses by which subunits shape, transpose and evade institutions in the pursuit of competitive advantage: Innovation, Arbitrage, Circumvention and Adaptation. These responses are driven by three key enablers: multinationality, foreignness and institutional ambiguity - that serve to enhance and heighten three mechanisms: reflexivity, role expectations and resources. By linking the enablers and the mechanisms to specific types of strategic responses in a framework and typology, the paper not only contributes to emerging research on the interplay between MNEs, institutions and strategy, but to strategy practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-302
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of International Business Studies
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Apr 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Industry
Host country
Multinational enterprises
Innovation
Strategic response
Enablers

Keywords

  • Case-theoretic approaches
  • Competitive advantage
  • Institutional context
  • Multinational corporations (MNCs) and enterprises (MNEs)
  • Neoinstitutional theory
  • Strategy and business strategy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

MNE institutional advantage : How subunits shape, transpose and evade host country institutions. / Regnér, Patrick; Edman, Jesper Carl Goeran.

In: Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 45, No. 3, 01.04.2014, p. 275-302.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c522d5c163de41cc859b7cf7a643af60,
title = "MNE institutional advantage: How subunits shape, transpose and evade host country institutions",
abstract = "Scholars increasingly emphasize the impact of institutions on multinational enterprises (MNEs), but the opposite relationship has attracted less research - that is, MNE agency in relation to institutions. Based on a comparative case study of six MNEs from the United States and Sweden, this paper remedies this. It explores and explicates MNE subunits' strategic responses to host country institutional constraints and opportunities in five different regions. A new-institutional approach is adopted, which allows for an investigation of MNE subunit agency in relation to normative and cognitive institutions, as well as regulative ones. This fine-grained analysis reveals not only what kinds of responses MNE subunits invoke, but why and how they are able to respond. We identify four strategic responses by which subunits shape, transpose and evade institutions in the pursuit of competitive advantage: Innovation, Arbitrage, Circumvention and Adaptation. These responses are driven by three key enablers: multinationality, foreignness and institutional ambiguity - that serve to enhance and heighten three mechanisms: reflexivity, role expectations and resources. By linking the enablers and the mechanisms to specific types of strategic responses in a framework and typology, the paper not only contributes to emerging research on the interplay between MNEs, institutions and strategy, but to strategy practice.",
keywords = "Case-theoretic approaches, Competitive advantage, Institutional context, Multinational corporations (MNCs) and enterprises (MNEs), Neoinstitutional theory, Strategy and business strategy",
author = "Patrick Regn{\'e}r and Edman, {Jesper Carl Goeran}",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1057/jibs.2013.66",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "275--302",
journal = "Journal of International Business Studies",
issn = "0047-2506",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MNE institutional advantage

T2 - How subunits shape, transpose and evade host country institutions

AU - Regnér, Patrick

AU - Edman, Jesper Carl Goeran

PY - 2014/4/1

Y1 - 2014/4/1

N2 - Scholars increasingly emphasize the impact of institutions on multinational enterprises (MNEs), but the opposite relationship has attracted less research - that is, MNE agency in relation to institutions. Based on a comparative case study of six MNEs from the United States and Sweden, this paper remedies this. It explores and explicates MNE subunits' strategic responses to host country institutional constraints and opportunities in five different regions. A new-institutional approach is adopted, which allows for an investigation of MNE subunit agency in relation to normative and cognitive institutions, as well as regulative ones. This fine-grained analysis reveals not only what kinds of responses MNE subunits invoke, but why and how they are able to respond. We identify four strategic responses by which subunits shape, transpose and evade institutions in the pursuit of competitive advantage: Innovation, Arbitrage, Circumvention and Adaptation. These responses are driven by three key enablers: multinationality, foreignness and institutional ambiguity - that serve to enhance and heighten three mechanisms: reflexivity, role expectations and resources. By linking the enablers and the mechanisms to specific types of strategic responses in a framework and typology, the paper not only contributes to emerging research on the interplay between MNEs, institutions and strategy, but to strategy practice.

AB - Scholars increasingly emphasize the impact of institutions on multinational enterprises (MNEs), but the opposite relationship has attracted less research - that is, MNE agency in relation to institutions. Based on a comparative case study of six MNEs from the United States and Sweden, this paper remedies this. It explores and explicates MNE subunits' strategic responses to host country institutional constraints and opportunities in five different regions. A new-institutional approach is adopted, which allows for an investigation of MNE subunit agency in relation to normative and cognitive institutions, as well as regulative ones. This fine-grained analysis reveals not only what kinds of responses MNE subunits invoke, but why and how they are able to respond. We identify four strategic responses by which subunits shape, transpose and evade institutions in the pursuit of competitive advantage: Innovation, Arbitrage, Circumvention and Adaptation. These responses are driven by three key enablers: multinationality, foreignness and institutional ambiguity - that serve to enhance and heighten three mechanisms: reflexivity, role expectations and resources. By linking the enablers and the mechanisms to specific types of strategic responses in a framework and typology, the paper not only contributes to emerging research on the interplay between MNEs, institutions and strategy, but to strategy practice.

KW - Case-theoretic approaches

KW - Competitive advantage

KW - Institutional context

KW - Multinational corporations (MNCs) and enterprises (MNEs)

KW - Neoinstitutional theory

KW - Strategy and business strategy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897902277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897902277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/jibs.2013.66

DO - 10.1057/jibs.2013.66

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84897902277

VL - 45

SP - 275

EP - 302

JO - Journal of International Business Studies

JF - Journal of International Business Studies

SN - 0047-2506

IS - 3

ER -