Muscle cross-sectional areas and performance power of limbs and trunk in the rowing motion

Kanta Tachibana, Kazuya Yashiro, Jun Miyazaki, Yasuo Ikegami, Mitsuru Higuchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although it is clear that rowers have a large muscle mass, their distribution of muscle mass and which of the main motions in rowing mediates muscle hypertrophy in each body part are unclear. We examine the relationships between partial motion power in rowing and muscle cross-sectional area of the thigh, lower back, and upper arms. Sixty young rowers (39 males and 21 females) participated in the study. Joint positions and forces were measured by video cameras and rowing ergometer software, respectively. One-dimensional motion analysis was performed to calculate the power of leg drive, trunk swing, and arm pull motions. Muscle cross-sectional areas were measured using magnetic resonance imaging. Multiple regression analyses were carried out to determine the association of different muscle cross-sectional areas with partial motion power. The anterior thigh best explained the power demonstrated by leg drive (r2=0.508), the posterior thigh and lower back combined best explained the power demonstrated by the trunk swing (r2=0.493), and the elbow extensors best explained the power demonstrated by the arm pull (r2=0.195). Other correlations, such as arm muscles with leg drive power (r2=0.424) and anterior thigh with trunk swing power (r2=0.335), were also significant. All muscle cross-sectional areas were associated with rowing performance either through the production of power or by transmitting work. The results imply that rowing motion requires a well-balanced distribution of muscle mass throughout the body.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-58
Number of pages15
JournalSports Biomechanics
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Extremities
Muscles
Thigh
Arm
Leg
Elbow
Human Body
Hypertrophy
Software
Joints
Regression Analysis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Keywords

  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Motion analysis
  • Rowing performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Muscle cross-sectional areas and performance power of limbs and trunk in the rowing motion. / Tachibana, Kanta; Yashiro, Kazuya; Miyazaki, Jun; Ikegami, Yasuo; Higuchi, Mitsuru.

In: Sports Biomechanics, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2007, p. 44-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tachibana, K, Yashiro, K, Miyazaki, J, Ikegami, Y & Higuchi, M 2007, 'Muscle cross-sectional areas and performance power of limbs and trunk in the rowing motion', Sports Biomechanics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 44-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763140601058516
Tachibana, Kanta ; Yashiro, Kazuya ; Miyazaki, Jun ; Ikegami, Yasuo ; Higuchi, Mitsuru. / Muscle cross-sectional areas and performance power of limbs and trunk in the rowing motion. In: Sports Biomechanics. 2007 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 44-58.
@article{7f25555739d644e2ae1524eac1f002cc,
title = "Muscle cross-sectional areas and performance power of limbs and trunk in the rowing motion",
abstract = "Although it is clear that rowers have a large muscle mass, their distribution of muscle mass and which of the main motions in rowing mediates muscle hypertrophy in each body part are unclear. We examine the relationships between partial motion power in rowing and muscle cross-sectional area of the thigh, lower back, and upper arms. Sixty young rowers (39 males and 21 females) participated in the study. Joint positions and forces were measured by video cameras and rowing ergometer software, respectively. One-dimensional motion analysis was performed to calculate the power of leg drive, trunk swing, and arm pull motions. Muscle cross-sectional areas were measured using magnetic resonance imaging. Multiple regression analyses were carried out to determine the association of different muscle cross-sectional areas with partial motion power. The anterior thigh best explained the power demonstrated by leg drive (r2=0.508), the posterior thigh and lower back combined best explained the power demonstrated by the trunk swing (r2=0.493), and the elbow extensors best explained the power demonstrated by the arm pull (r2=0.195). Other correlations, such as arm muscles with leg drive power (r2=0.424) and anterior thigh with trunk swing power (r2=0.335), were also significant. All muscle cross-sectional areas were associated with rowing performance either through the production of power or by transmitting work. The results imply that rowing motion requires a well-balanced distribution of muscle mass throughout the body.",
keywords = "Magnetic resonance imaging, Motion analysis, Rowing performance",
author = "Kanta Tachibana and Kazuya Yashiro and Jun Miyazaki and Yasuo Ikegami and Mitsuru Higuchi",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1080/14763140601058516",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "44--58",
journal = "Sports Biomechanics",
issn = "1476-3141",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Muscle cross-sectional areas and performance power of limbs and trunk in the rowing motion

AU - Tachibana, Kanta

AU - Yashiro, Kazuya

AU - Miyazaki, Jun

AU - Ikegami, Yasuo

AU - Higuchi, Mitsuru

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Although it is clear that rowers have a large muscle mass, their distribution of muscle mass and which of the main motions in rowing mediates muscle hypertrophy in each body part are unclear. We examine the relationships between partial motion power in rowing and muscle cross-sectional area of the thigh, lower back, and upper arms. Sixty young rowers (39 males and 21 females) participated in the study. Joint positions and forces were measured by video cameras and rowing ergometer software, respectively. One-dimensional motion analysis was performed to calculate the power of leg drive, trunk swing, and arm pull motions. Muscle cross-sectional areas were measured using magnetic resonance imaging. Multiple regression analyses were carried out to determine the association of different muscle cross-sectional areas with partial motion power. The anterior thigh best explained the power demonstrated by leg drive (r2=0.508), the posterior thigh and lower back combined best explained the power demonstrated by the trunk swing (r2=0.493), and the elbow extensors best explained the power demonstrated by the arm pull (r2=0.195). Other correlations, such as arm muscles with leg drive power (r2=0.424) and anterior thigh with trunk swing power (r2=0.335), were also significant. All muscle cross-sectional areas were associated with rowing performance either through the production of power or by transmitting work. The results imply that rowing motion requires a well-balanced distribution of muscle mass throughout the body.

AB - Although it is clear that rowers have a large muscle mass, their distribution of muscle mass and which of the main motions in rowing mediates muscle hypertrophy in each body part are unclear. We examine the relationships between partial motion power in rowing and muscle cross-sectional area of the thigh, lower back, and upper arms. Sixty young rowers (39 males and 21 females) participated in the study. Joint positions and forces were measured by video cameras and rowing ergometer software, respectively. One-dimensional motion analysis was performed to calculate the power of leg drive, trunk swing, and arm pull motions. Muscle cross-sectional areas were measured using magnetic resonance imaging. Multiple regression analyses were carried out to determine the association of different muscle cross-sectional areas with partial motion power. The anterior thigh best explained the power demonstrated by leg drive (r2=0.508), the posterior thigh and lower back combined best explained the power demonstrated by the trunk swing (r2=0.493), and the elbow extensors best explained the power demonstrated by the arm pull (r2=0.195). Other correlations, such as arm muscles with leg drive power (r2=0.424) and anterior thigh with trunk swing power (r2=0.335), were also significant. All muscle cross-sectional areas were associated with rowing performance either through the production of power or by transmitting work. The results imply that rowing motion requires a well-balanced distribution of muscle mass throughout the body.

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Motion analysis

KW - Rowing performance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447556969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447556969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14763140601058516

DO - 10.1080/14763140601058516

M3 - Article

C2 - 17542177

AN - SCOPUS:34447556969

VL - 6

SP - 44

EP - 58

JO - Sports Biomechanics

JF - Sports Biomechanics

SN - 1476-3141

IS - 1

ER -