Narrative responsibility and moral dilemma: A case study of a family's decision about a brain-dead daughter

Takanobu Kinjo, Masahiro Morioka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A brain death case is presented and reinterpreted using the narrative approach. In the case, two Japanese parents face a dilemma about whether to respect their daughter's desire to donate organs even though, for them, it would mean literally killing their daughter. We argue that the ethical dilemma occurred because the parents were confronted with two conflicting narratives to which they felt a "narrative responsibility," namely, the responsibility that drives us to tell, retell, and coauthor the (often unfinished) narratives of loved ones. We suggest that moral dilemmas arise not only from conflicts between moral justifications but also from conflicts between narratives and human relationships.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-99
Number of pages9
JournalTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Apr
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Brain Death
Nuclear Family
Parents
Conflict (Psychology)
Drive

Keywords

  • Brain death in Japan
  • Moral dilemma
  • Narrative dilemma
  • Narrative ethics
  • Narrative responsibility
  • Organ donation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Cite this

Narrative responsibility and moral dilemma : A case study of a family's decision about a brain-dead daughter. / Kinjo, Takanobu; Morioka, Masahiro.

In: Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, Vol. 32, No. 2, 04.2011, p. 91-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3a2dd591e5ec4474922fbae73bb7853c,
title = "Narrative responsibility and moral dilemma: A case study of a family's decision about a brain-dead daughter",
abstract = "A brain death case is presented and reinterpreted using the narrative approach. In the case, two Japanese parents face a dilemma about whether to respect their daughter's desire to donate organs even though, for them, it would mean literally killing their daughter. We argue that the ethical dilemma occurred because the parents were confronted with two conflicting narratives to which they felt a {"}narrative responsibility,{"} namely, the responsibility that drives us to tell, retell, and coauthor the (often unfinished) narratives of loved ones. We suggest that moral dilemmas arise not only from conflicts between moral justifications but also from conflicts between narratives and human relationships.",
keywords = "Brain death in Japan, Moral dilemma, Narrative dilemma, Narrative ethics, Narrative responsibility, Organ donation",
author = "Takanobu Kinjo and Masahiro Morioka",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s11017-010-9160-y",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "91--99",
journal = "Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics",
issn = "1386-7415",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Narrative responsibility and moral dilemma

T2 - A case study of a family's decision about a brain-dead daughter

AU - Kinjo, Takanobu

AU - Morioka, Masahiro

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - A brain death case is presented and reinterpreted using the narrative approach. In the case, two Japanese parents face a dilemma about whether to respect their daughter's desire to donate organs even though, for them, it would mean literally killing their daughter. We argue that the ethical dilemma occurred because the parents were confronted with two conflicting narratives to which they felt a "narrative responsibility," namely, the responsibility that drives us to tell, retell, and coauthor the (often unfinished) narratives of loved ones. We suggest that moral dilemmas arise not only from conflicts between moral justifications but also from conflicts between narratives and human relationships.

AB - A brain death case is presented and reinterpreted using the narrative approach. In the case, two Japanese parents face a dilemma about whether to respect their daughter's desire to donate organs even though, for them, it would mean literally killing their daughter. We argue that the ethical dilemma occurred because the parents were confronted with two conflicting narratives to which they felt a "narrative responsibility," namely, the responsibility that drives us to tell, retell, and coauthor the (often unfinished) narratives of loved ones. We suggest that moral dilemmas arise not only from conflicts between moral justifications but also from conflicts between narratives and human relationships.

KW - Brain death in Japan

KW - Moral dilemma

KW - Narrative dilemma

KW - Narrative ethics

KW - Narrative responsibility

KW - Organ donation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956089671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956089671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11017-010-9160-y

DO - 10.1007/s11017-010-9160-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 21053084

AN - SCOPUS:79956089671

VL - 32

SP - 91

EP - 99

JO - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

JF - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

SN - 1386-7415

IS - 2

ER -