News discourse and its influence on readers

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper investigates the ways in which readers interpret a news editorial on the basis of cultural assumptions formulated partly under the influence of the media they are associated with. For this investigation, questionnaires (English and Japanese versions) on the discourse of whaling were administered to 30 Japanese postgraduate students and 30 British, European and North American academics, researchers and teachers. In addition, seven EFL students also participated in filling in the questionnaire. The result shows that in the case of the English version, the majority of the non-Japanese respondents were anti-whaling, while most of the Japanese version respondents (Japanese) were either neutral or pro-whaling. This is clearly reflected in their interpretation of the text. The English respondents overwhelmingly supported the editor's anti-whaling stance despite pointing out the excessive use of emotive language. By contrast, most of the Japanese respondents showed strong disagreement with the editor's attitude, pointing out the lack of evidence and information. Although the result does not necessarily show that this single editorial had a direct influence on the respondents, there are nonetheless some indications of the ways in which naïve readers could be influenced by the media. Finally, the paper discusses implications of this study for language pedagogy.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)243-266
    Number of pages24
    JournalJournal of Asia TEFL
    Volume1
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Fingerprint

    news
    editor
    questionnaire
    discourse
    language
    indication
    student
    interpretation
    lack
    teacher
    evidence

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Education
    • Linguistics and Language

    Cite this

    News discourse and its influence on readers. / Murata, Kumiko.

    In: Journal of Asia TEFL, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2004, p. 243-266.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{cc600ee3b66f434fb7752f775ed4d287,
    title = "News discourse and its influence on readers",
    abstract = "This paper investigates the ways in which readers interpret a news editorial on the basis of cultural assumptions formulated partly under the influence of the media they are associated with. For this investigation, questionnaires (English and Japanese versions) on the discourse of whaling were administered to 30 Japanese postgraduate students and 30 British, European and North American academics, researchers and teachers. In addition, seven EFL students also participated in filling in the questionnaire. The result shows that in the case of the English version, the majority of the non-Japanese respondents were anti-whaling, while most of the Japanese version respondents (Japanese) were either neutral or pro-whaling. This is clearly reflected in their interpretation of the text. The English respondents overwhelmingly supported the editor's anti-whaling stance despite pointing out the excessive use of emotive language. By contrast, most of the Japanese respondents showed strong disagreement with the editor's attitude, pointing out the lack of evidence and information. Although the result does not necessarily show that this single editorial had a direct influence on the respondents, there are nonetheless some indications of the ways in which na{\"i}ve readers could be influenced by the media. Finally, the paper discusses implications of this study for language pedagogy.",
    author = "Kumiko Murata",
    year = "2004",
    language = "English",
    volume = "1",
    pages = "243--266",
    journal = "Journal of Asia TEFL",
    issn = "1738-3102",
    publisher = "The Asian Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - News discourse and its influence on readers

    AU - Murata, Kumiko

    PY - 2004

    Y1 - 2004

    N2 - This paper investigates the ways in which readers interpret a news editorial on the basis of cultural assumptions formulated partly under the influence of the media they are associated with. For this investigation, questionnaires (English and Japanese versions) on the discourse of whaling were administered to 30 Japanese postgraduate students and 30 British, European and North American academics, researchers and teachers. In addition, seven EFL students also participated in filling in the questionnaire. The result shows that in the case of the English version, the majority of the non-Japanese respondents were anti-whaling, while most of the Japanese version respondents (Japanese) were either neutral or pro-whaling. This is clearly reflected in their interpretation of the text. The English respondents overwhelmingly supported the editor's anti-whaling stance despite pointing out the excessive use of emotive language. By contrast, most of the Japanese respondents showed strong disagreement with the editor's attitude, pointing out the lack of evidence and information. Although the result does not necessarily show that this single editorial had a direct influence on the respondents, there are nonetheless some indications of the ways in which naïve readers could be influenced by the media. Finally, the paper discusses implications of this study for language pedagogy.

    AB - This paper investigates the ways in which readers interpret a news editorial on the basis of cultural assumptions formulated partly under the influence of the media they are associated with. For this investigation, questionnaires (English and Japanese versions) on the discourse of whaling were administered to 30 Japanese postgraduate students and 30 British, European and North American academics, researchers and teachers. In addition, seven EFL students also participated in filling in the questionnaire. The result shows that in the case of the English version, the majority of the non-Japanese respondents were anti-whaling, while most of the Japanese version respondents (Japanese) were either neutral or pro-whaling. This is clearly reflected in their interpretation of the text. The English respondents overwhelmingly supported the editor's anti-whaling stance despite pointing out the excessive use of emotive language. By contrast, most of the Japanese respondents showed strong disagreement with the editor's attitude, pointing out the lack of evidence and information. Although the result does not necessarily show that this single editorial had a direct influence on the respondents, there are nonetheless some indications of the ways in which naïve readers could be influenced by the media. Finally, the paper discusses implications of this study for language pedagogy.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35648995606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35648995606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    VL - 1

    SP - 243

    EP - 266

    JO - Journal of Asia TEFL

    JF - Journal of Asia TEFL

    SN - 1738-3102

    IS - 1

    ER -