Nuclear risk governance in Japan and the fukushima triple disaster

Lessons unlearned

Pablo Figueroa

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nuclear risk governance in Japan came to the fore of public concern following the triple disasters of March 11, 2011. For the first time since atomic energy was incepted, citizens became aware that despite pervasive narratives of technological safety, nuclear power poses a tangible risk on people’s lives. In this context, 3.11 reveals the urban and compound nature of contemporary disasters. Regardless of having taken place in a nonurban region, the effects of the earthquake, tsunami and cascading accidents at the Fukushima plant were severely compounded by inadequate decision-making in the capital. Lack of transparency, lack of governance and poor risk communication emerged as salient issues affecting disaster prevention and response. This chapter interrogates the historical and political context that paved the road to the worst nuclear accident in recent times. It then discusses institutional weaknesses in safety assessments and describes conflicts that characterized the expansion of nuclear power. Finally, it argues that in order not to repeat the same mistakes that led to the Fukushima catastrophe, important lessons in nuclear risk governance have yet to be learned. These include the need for greater transparency, strengthening the independence of regulatory bodies, the importance of taking into account people’s perceptions of nuclear energy, facilitating citizen participation in the construction of risk discourses and acknowledging the vital role of cities (especially Tokyo) in disaster governance.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDisaster Governance in Urbanising Asia
PublisherSpringer Singapore
Pages263-282
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9789812876492
ISBN (Print)9789812876485
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Disasters
disaster
Nuclear energy
Japan
governance
nuclear energy
nuclear power
transparency
accident
Transparency
Accidents
risk communication
citizens' participation
lack
Disaster prevention
Tsunamis
natural disaster
road
citizen
Earthquakes

Keywords

  • Compound disaster
  • Fukushima
  • Japan
  • Nuclear risk governance
  • Transparency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Engineering(all)
  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Figueroa, P. (2015). Nuclear risk governance in Japan and the fukushima triple disaster: Lessons unlearned. In Disaster Governance in Urbanising Asia (pp. 263-282). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-649-2_13

Nuclear risk governance in Japan and the fukushima triple disaster : Lessons unlearned. / Figueroa, Pablo.

Disaster Governance in Urbanising Asia. Springer Singapore, 2015. p. 263-282.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Figueroa, P 2015, Nuclear risk governance in Japan and the fukushima triple disaster: Lessons unlearned. in Disaster Governance in Urbanising Asia. Springer Singapore, pp. 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-649-2_13
Figueroa P. Nuclear risk governance in Japan and the fukushima triple disaster: Lessons unlearned. In Disaster Governance in Urbanising Asia. Springer Singapore. 2015. p. 263-282 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-649-2_13
Figueroa, Pablo. / Nuclear risk governance in Japan and the fukushima triple disaster : Lessons unlearned. Disaster Governance in Urbanising Asia. Springer Singapore, 2015. pp. 263-282
@inbook{07d6749dfd1f42a6a059b91f70aabf1e,
title = "Nuclear risk governance in Japan and the fukushima triple disaster: Lessons unlearned",
abstract = "Nuclear risk governance in Japan came to the fore of public concern following the triple disasters of March 11, 2011. For the first time since atomic energy was incepted, citizens became aware that despite pervasive narratives of technological safety, nuclear power poses a tangible risk on people’s lives. In this context, 3.11 reveals the urban and compound nature of contemporary disasters. Regardless of having taken place in a nonurban region, the effects of the earthquake, tsunami and cascading accidents at the Fukushima plant were severely compounded by inadequate decision-making in the capital. Lack of transparency, lack of governance and poor risk communication emerged as salient issues affecting disaster prevention and response. This chapter interrogates the historical and political context that paved the road to the worst nuclear accident in recent times. It then discusses institutional weaknesses in safety assessments and describes conflicts that characterized the expansion of nuclear power. Finally, it argues that in order not to repeat the same mistakes that led to the Fukushima catastrophe, important lessons in nuclear risk governance have yet to be learned. These include the need for greater transparency, strengthening the independence of regulatory bodies, the importance of taking into account people’s perceptions of nuclear energy, facilitating citizen participation in the construction of risk discourses and acknowledging the vital role of cities (especially Tokyo) in disaster governance.",
keywords = "Compound disaster, Fukushima, Japan, Nuclear risk governance, Transparency",
author = "Pablo Figueroa",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-981-287-649-2_13",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789812876485",
pages = "263--282",
booktitle = "Disaster Governance in Urbanising Asia",
publisher = "Springer Singapore",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Nuclear risk governance in Japan and the fukushima triple disaster

T2 - Lessons unlearned

AU - Figueroa, Pablo

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Nuclear risk governance in Japan came to the fore of public concern following the triple disasters of March 11, 2011. For the first time since atomic energy was incepted, citizens became aware that despite pervasive narratives of technological safety, nuclear power poses a tangible risk on people’s lives. In this context, 3.11 reveals the urban and compound nature of contemporary disasters. Regardless of having taken place in a nonurban region, the effects of the earthquake, tsunami and cascading accidents at the Fukushima plant were severely compounded by inadequate decision-making in the capital. Lack of transparency, lack of governance and poor risk communication emerged as salient issues affecting disaster prevention and response. This chapter interrogates the historical and political context that paved the road to the worst nuclear accident in recent times. It then discusses institutional weaknesses in safety assessments and describes conflicts that characterized the expansion of nuclear power. Finally, it argues that in order not to repeat the same mistakes that led to the Fukushima catastrophe, important lessons in nuclear risk governance have yet to be learned. These include the need for greater transparency, strengthening the independence of regulatory bodies, the importance of taking into account people’s perceptions of nuclear energy, facilitating citizen participation in the construction of risk discourses and acknowledging the vital role of cities (especially Tokyo) in disaster governance.

AB - Nuclear risk governance in Japan came to the fore of public concern following the triple disasters of March 11, 2011. For the first time since atomic energy was incepted, citizens became aware that despite pervasive narratives of technological safety, nuclear power poses a tangible risk on people’s lives. In this context, 3.11 reveals the urban and compound nature of contemporary disasters. Regardless of having taken place in a nonurban region, the effects of the earthquake, tsunami and cascading accidents at the Fukushima plant were severely compounded by inadequate decision-making in the capital. Lack of transparency, lack of governance and poor risk communication emerged as salient issues affecting disaster prevention and response. This chapter interrogates the historical and political context that paved the road to the worst nuclear accident in recent times. It then discusses institutional weaknesses in safety assessments and describes conflicts that characterized the expansion of nuclear power. Finally, it argues that in order not to repeat the same mistakes that led to the Fukushima catastrophe, important lessons in nuclear risk governance have yet to be learned. These include the need for greater transparency, strengthening the independence of regulatory bodies, the importance of taking into account people’s perceptions of nuclear energy, facilitating citizen participation in the construction of risk discourses and acknowledging the vital role of cities (especially Tokyo) in disaster governance.

KW - Compound disaster

KW - Fukushima

KW - Japan

KW - Nuclear risk governance

KW - Transparency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016030419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016030419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-981-287-649-2_13

DO - 10.1007/978-981-287-649-2_13

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789812876485

SP - 263

EP - 282

BT - Disaster Governance in Urbanising Asia

PB - Springer Singapore

ER -